Distinct trajectories distinguish antigen-specific T cells in peanut-allergic individuals undergoing oral immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Despite similar clinical symptoms, peanut-allergic (PA) individuals may respond quite differently to the same therapeutic interventions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether inherent qualities of cell response at baseline could influence response to peanut oral immunotherapy (PnOIT). METHODS: We first performed ex vivo T-cell profiling on peanut-reactive CD154+CD137+ T (pTeff) cells from 90 challenge-confirmed PA individuals. We developed a gating strategy for unbiased assessment of the phenotypic distribution of rare pTeff cells across different memory CD4+ T-cell subsets to define patient immunotype. In longitudinal samples of 29 PA participants enrolled onto the IMPACT trial of PnOIT, we determined whether patient immunotype at baseline could influence response to PnOIT. RESULTS: Our data emphasize the heterogeneity of pTeff cell responses in PA participants with 2 mutually exclusive phenotypic entities (CCR6-CRTH2+ and CCR6+CRTH2-). Our findings lead us to propose that peanut allergy can be classified broadly into at least 2 discrete subtypes, termed immunotypes, with distinct immunologic and clinical characteristics that are based on the proportion of TH2A pTeff cells. PnOIT induced elimination of TH2A pTeff cells in the context of the IMPACT clinical trial. Only 1 PA patient with a low level of TH2A pTeff cells at baseline experienced long-lasting benefit of remission after PnOIT discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Dividing PA patients according to their individual peanut-specific T-cell profile may facilitate patient stratification in clinical settings by identifying which immunotypes might respond best to different therapies.

Oral desensitization therapy for peanut allergy induces dynamic changes in peanut-specific immune responses.

BACKGROUND: The PALISADE study, an international, phase 3 trial of peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) with AR101, resulted in desensitization in children and adolescents who were highly allergic to peanut. An improved understanding of the immune mechanism induced in response to food allergen immunotherapy would enable more informed and effective therapeutic strategies. Our main purpose was to examine the immunological changes in blood samples from a subset of peanut-allergic individuals undergoing oral desensitization immunotherapy with AR101. METHODS: Blood samples obtained as part of enrollment screening and at multiple time points during PALISADE study were used to assess basophil and CD4+ T-cell reactivity to peanut. RESULTS: The absence of clinical reactivity to the entry double-blinded placebo-controlled peanut challenge (DBPCFC) was accompanied by a significantly lower basophil sensitivity and T-cell reactivity to peanut compared with DBPCFC reactors. At baseline, peanut-reactive TH2A cells were observed in many but not all peanut-allergic patients and their level in peripheral blood correlates with T-cell reactivity to peanut and with serum peanut-specific IgE and IgG4 levels. POIT reshaped circulating peanut-reactive T-cell responses in a subset-dependent manner. Changes in basophil and T-cell responses to peanut closely paralleled clinical benefits to AR101 therapy and resemble responses in those with lower clinical sensitivity to peanut. However, no difference in peanut-reactive Treg cell frequency was observed between groups. CONCLUSION: Oral desensitization therapy with AR101 leads to decreased basophil sensitivity to peanut and reshapes peanut-reactive T effector cell responses supporting its potential as an immunomodulatory therapy.

Clinical and immunological evaluation of cat-allergic asthmatics living with or without a cat.

BACKGROUND: Characterising the clinical and immunological impact of daily cat exposure in cat-allergic subjects with asthma who live with cats (WC) and those who do not (WoC) may provide understanding of the drivers of the allergic response. METHODS: Clinical and immunological characteristics (skin prick test, spirometry, symptom assessments, immunological markers) were compared between asthmatic subjects WC (n = 10) and WoC (n = 9). RESULTS: WC subjects had greater use of long-acting beta agonists (p < .05) and high-potency corticosteroids. No differences were observed in lung function, nasal and ocular symptoms, or asthma control between the groups. Cat dander- and Fel d 1-specific IgG4 concentrations were higher in WC than WoC subjects (both p < .05). Total IgE and cat dander-, Fel d 1- and Fel d 7-specific IgE concentrations were similar, but Fel d 4-sIgE was higher in WC subjects (p < .05) versus WoC. Basophil sensitivity to cat dander extract and Fel d 1 was lower in WC versus WoC subjects (p < .05) and correlated with higher IgG4 concentrations (r = 0.63; p = .009). Fel d 1-specific CD4+ T-cell responses polarised toward Th2A responses in WC versus WoC subjects; Fel d 1-specific IgE correlated with surface expression of CRTH2 and CD200R (both p ≤ .05). CONCLUSION: Immunological differences observed in WC versus WoC did not reflect clinical tolerance with natural cat exposure. The ability to live with a cat despite allergy could be driven by higher preventative medication use. This study may support design of novel therapeutics for allergy management.

Optimal human pathogenic TH2 cell effector function requires local epithelial cytokine signaling.

BACKGROUND: IL-33 is an emerging key factor in development of allergic diseases. The IL-33 receptor (suppressor of tumorigenicity [ST2]) is a differentially expressed gene in pathogenic TH2 cells, but its role in T-cell effector function has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of IL-33 in modulating circulating allergen-specific T-cell responses. We hypothesized that selective ST2 expression on allergen-specific CD4+ T cells would confer susceptibility to the effects of IL-33. METHODS: PBMCs from subjects with food allergy, inhalant allergy, and no allergy were obtained on the basis of clinical history and serum IgE level. A T-cell receptor-dependent CD154 upregulation assay and direct peptide major histocompatibility complex class II tetramer staining were used to profile allergen-specific CD4+ T cells by flow cytometry. Allergen-specific CD4+ T cell cytokine production was evaluated during IL-33 exposure. ST2 expression was also tracked by using a 2-color flow-based assay. RESULTS: ST2 expression on peripheral allergen-specific CD4+ T cells was confined to subjects with allergy and restricted to TH2A cells. Comparison between direct peptide major histocompatibility complex class II tetramer staining and the CD154 functional assay identified ST2 as a marker of TH2A cell activation. IL-33 exposure enhanced IL-4 and IL-5 secretion in allergen-reactive TH2A cells. Allergen-induced ST2 expression on peripheral CD4+ T cells can be used to track allergen-reactive TH2A cells from donors with allergy. CONCLUSION: ST2 expression on circulating CD4+ T cells represents a transient phenotype associated with TH2A cell activation, allowing these cells to sense locally elicited tissue cytokines. IL-33 selectively amplifies pathogenic TH2 cell effector functions, suggesting a tissue checkpoint that may regulate adaptive allergic immunity.

Heterogeneity of Ara h Component-Specific CD4 T Cell Responses in Peanut-Allergic Subjects.

Understanding the peanut-specific CD4 T cell responses in peanut-allergic (PA) subjects should provide new insights into the development of innovative immunotherapies for the treatment of peanut allergy. Although peanut-specific CD4 T cells have a TH2 profile in PA subjects, the immunogenicity of different Ara h components in eliciting specific CD4 T cell responses and the heterogeneity of these Ara h-reactive TH2 cells remains unclear. In this study, we investigated Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8-specific T cell responses in PA and sensitized non-peanut-allergic (sNPA) subjects, using the CD154 upregulation assay and the class II tetramer technology. In the PA group, T cells directed against Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 6 have a heterogeneous TH2 phenotype characterized by differential expression of CRTH2, CD27, and CCR6. Reactivity toward these different components was also distinct for each PA subject. Two dominant Ara h 2 epitopes associated with DR1501 and DR0901 were also identified. Frequencies of Ara h-specific T cell responses were also linked to the peanut specific-IgE level. Conversely, low peanut-IgE level in sNPA subjects was associated with a weak or an absence of the allergen-specific T cell reactivity. Ara h 8-specific T cell reactivity was weak in both PA and sNPA subjects. Thus, peanut-IgE level was associated with a heterogeneous Ara h (but not Ara h 8)-specific T cell reactivity only in PA patients. This suggests an important immunogenicity of each Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 6 in inducing peanut allergy. Targeting Ara h 1-, 2-, 3-, and 6-specific effector-TH2 cells can be the future way to treat peanut allergy.

A phenotypically and functionally distinct human TH2 cell subpopulation is associated with allergic disorders.

Allergen-specific type 2 helper T (TH2) cells play a central role in initiating and orchestrating the allergic and asthmatic inflammatory response pathways. One major factor limiting the use of such atopic disease-causing T cells as both therapeutic targets and clinically useful biomarkers is the lack of an accepted methodology to identify and differentiate these cells from overall nonpathogenic TH2 cell types. We have described a subset of human memory TH2 cells confined to atopic individuals that includes all allergen-specific TH2 cells. These cells are terminally differentiated CD4+ T cells (CD27- and CD45RB-) characterized by coexpression of CRTH2, CD49d, and CD161 and exhibit numerous functional attributes distinct from conventional TH2 cells. Hence, we have denoted these cells with this stable allergic disease-related phenotype as the TH2A cell subset. Transcriptome analysis further revealed a distinct pathway in the initiation of pathogenic responses to allergen, and elimination of these cells is indicative of clinical responses induced by immunotherapy. Together, these findings identify a human TH2 cell signature in allergic diseases that could be used for response-monitoring and designing appropriate immunomodulatory strategies.

T cell epitopes and post-translationally modified epitopes in type 1 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease in which progressive loss of self-tolerance, evidenced by accumulation of auto-antibodies and auto-reactive T cells that recognize diverse self-proteins, leads to immune-mediated destruction of pancreatic beta cells and loss of insulin secretion. In this review, we discuss antigens and epitopes in T1D and the role that post-translational modifications play in circumventing tolerance mechanisms and increasing antigenic diversity. Emerging data suggest that, analogous to other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and celiac disease, enzymatically modified epitopes are preferentially recognized in T1D. Modifying enzymes such as peptidyl deiminases and tissue transglutaminase are activated in response to beta cell stress, providing a mechanistic link between post-translational modification and interactions with the environment. Although studies of such responses in the at-risk population have been limited, current data suggests that breakdown in tolerance through post-translational modification represents an important checkpoint in the development of T1D.

DNA vaccination with all-trans retinoic acid treatment induces long-term survival and elicits specific immune responses requiring CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation in an acute promyelocytic leukemia mouse model.

DNA vaccination and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) result in a survival advantage in a mouse model of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Depletion of CD4(+) or CD8(+) cells abolished this effect. CD4(+) depletions of long-term survivors resulted in relapse and death within 3 months, thus demonstrating the need of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) subsets for the generation of DNA-driven antileukemic immune responses and underscoring a crucial role of CD4(+) cells in the maintenance of durable remissions. Degranulation and cytotoxic carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester-based assays showed major histocompatibility complex-restricted APL-specific T cell-mediated immune responses. Sorted APL-specific CD8(+)CD107a(+) T cells showed an increase of antileukemic activity. Effectors from ATRA + DNA-treated mice were shown to secrete interferon-gamma when stimulated with either APL cells or peptides from the promyelocytic leukemia-RARalpha vaccine-derived sequences as detected by ELISpot assays. Our results demonstrate that DNA vaccination with ATRA confers the effective boosting of interferon-gamma-producing and cytotoxic T cells in the leukemic mice.

Patterns of cytomegalovirus reactivation are associated with distinct evolutive profiles of immune reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

T cell-mediated immunity is essential for the control of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Our aims were to identify patterns of CMV-specific immune responses associated with multiple or prolonged reactivations. We analyzed findings in 116 recipients during the course of infection or reactivation and latency. CD8(+) T cell responses were determined weekly, using HLA class I tetramers together with extended phenotypic analyses. Our results confirmed that recipients of allo-HSCT from unrelated donors were more susceptible to multiple reactivations and that the donor's CMV serological status influenced the occurrence of prolonged reactivations. We found that a lack of CMV-specific T cells after the first episode of reactivation was associated with multiple subsequent reactivations. In patients with uncontrolled reactivations, CMV-specific T cells of the late differentiation phenotype CD45RA(+)CD27(-)CD28(-) did not develop. Longitudinal evaluation of CD27 and CD45RA expression within the tetramer-positive subset could help identify patients in whom a protective immune response is developing. Evaluation of CMV-specific immune responses during the first episode of reactivation, together with extended phenotypes, could thus improve immune monitoring, especially in recipients at risk of uncontrolled viral reactivation.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation in allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: relationship between viral load, EBV-specific T-cell reconstitution and rituximab therapy.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation markedly improved with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction amplification of EBV DNA and visualization of EBV-specific CD8+ T cells with peptide-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I tetramers. We decided to combine these methods to evaluate posttransplant EBV reactivation and rituximab therapy. METHODS: We followed 56 patients treated with an HLA-genoidentical sibling (n=32), an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n=19), or an unrelated cord-blood transplant (n=5). EBV DNA was quantified in plasma and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Patient CD8+ T cells were stained with a panel of eight tetramers. RESULTS: EBV DNA was detected in half of the patients, mainly in the MUD group (17/19). In 19 patients, viral DNA was detected only in the cellular compartment. All patients who controlled reactivation without rituximab and despite a viral load of greater than 500 genome equivalents (gEq)/150,000 PBMC mounted an EBV-specific CD8+ T-cell response in greater than 1.4% of CD3+CD8+ T cells. Plasmatic EBV genome was found in nine patients preceded by a high cellular viral load. Three of these patients controlled the reactivation before or without the introduction of rituximab, and they all developed a significant and increasing EBV-specific T-cell response. Patients with EBV-specific T cells at the onset of reactivation controlled viral reactivation without rituximab. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the benefit of an early and close monitoring of EBV reactivation and CD8+-specific immune responses to initiate rituximab only when necessary and before the immune response becomes overwhelmed by the viral burden.