Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Cancer Ther ; 19(7): 1395-1405, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32381587

ABSTRACT

The estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) is expressed in a majority of breast cancers and drugs that inhibit ER signaling are the cornerstone of breast cancer pharmacotherapy. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are the frontline endocrine interventions of choice although their durability in metastatic disease is limited by activating point mutations within the ligand-binding domain of ESR1 that permit ligand-independent activation of the receptor. It has been suggested that the most commonly occurring ESR1 mutations would likely compromise the clinical activity of selective estrogen receptor downregulators and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) when used as second-line therapies. It was unclear, however, how these mutations, which are likely coexpressed in cells with ERWT, may impact response to ER ligands in a clinically meaningful manner. To address this issue, we dissected the molecular mechanism(s) underlying ESR1-mutant pharmacology in models relevant to metastatic disease. These studies revealed that the response of ESR1 mutations to ligands was dictated primarily by the relative coexpression of ERWT in cells. Specifically, dysregulated pharmacology was only evident in cells in which the mutants were overexpressed relative to ligand-activated ERWT; a finding that highlights the role of allelism in determining ER-mutant pharmacology. Importantly, we demonstrated that the antagonist activity of the SERM, lasofoxifene, was not impacted by mutant status; a finding that has led to its clinical evaluation as a treatment for patients with advanced ER-positive breast cancer whose tumors harbor ESR1 mutations.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Estrogen Receptor alpha/genetics , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Mutation , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Ligands , Protein Binding , Tumor Cells, Cultured
2.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 180(3): 635-646, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32130619

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The combination of targeting the CDK4/6 and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling pathways with palbociclib and fulvestrant is a proven therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ER-positive breast cancer. However, the poor physicochemical properties of fulvestrant require monthly intramuscular injections to patients, which limit the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic activity of the compound. Therefore, an orally available compound that more rapidly reaches steady state may lead to a better clinical response in patients. Here, we report the identification of G1T48, a novel orally bioavailable, non-steroidal small molecule antagonist of ER. METHODS: The pharmacological effects and the antineoplastic mechanism of action of G1T48 on tumors was evaluated using human breast cancer cells (in vitro) and xenograft efficacy models (in vivo). RESULTS: G1T48 is a potent and efficacious inhibitor of estrogen-mediated transcription and proliferation in ER-positive breast cancer cells, similar to the pure antiestrogen fulvestrant. In addition, G1T48 can effectively suppress ER activity in multiple models of endocrine therapy resistance including those harboring ER mutations and growth factor activation. In vivo, G1T48 has robust antitumor activity in a model of estrogen-dependent breast cancer (MCF7) and significantly inhibited the growth of tamoxifen-resistant (TamR), long-term estrogen-deprived (LTED) and patient-derived xenograft tumors with an increased response being observed with the combination of G1T48 and the CDK4/6 inhibitor lerociclib. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that G1T48 has the potential to be an efficacious oral antineoplastic agent in ER-positive breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/antagonists & inhibitors , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6/antagonists & inhibitors , HIV Antibodies/pharmacology , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Estrogen Antagonists/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Mice , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/metabolism , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/pathology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Tamoxifen/pharmacology , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
3.
J Clin Invest ; 127(6): 2326-2338, 2017 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28463227

ABSTRACT

The clinical utility of inhibiting cytochrome P450 17A1 (CYP17), a cytochrome p450 enzyme that is required for the production of androgens, has been exemplified by the approval of abiraterone for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Recently, however, it has been reported that CYP17 inhibitors can interact directly with the androgen receptor (AR). A phase I study recently reported that seviteronel, a CYP17 lyase-selective inhibitor, ædemonstrated a sustained reduction in prostate-specific antigen in a patient with CRPC, and another study showed seviteronel's direct effects on AR function. This suggested that seviteronel may have therapeutically relevant activities in addition to its ability to inhibit androgen production. Here, we have demonstrated that CYP17 inhibitors, with the exception of orteronel, can function as competitive AR antagonists. Conformational profiling revealed that the CYP17 inhibitor-bound AR adopted a conformation that resembled the unliganded AR (apo-AR), precluding nuclear localization and DNA binding. Further, we observed that seviteronel and abiraterone inhibited the growth of tumor xenografts expressing the clinically relevant mutation AR-F876L and that this activity could be attributed entirely to competitive AR antagonism. The results of this study suggest that the ability of CYP17 inhibitors to directly antagonize the AR may contribute to their clinical efficacy in CRPC.


Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase/antagonists & inhibitors , Active Transport, Cell Nucleus , Animals , Benzamides , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Drug Synergism , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Male , Metribolone/pharmacology , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, SCID , Nitriles , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Phenylthiohydantoin/pharmacology , Protein Binding , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase/metabolism , Testosterone/pharmacology , Transcriptional Activation/drug effects , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
4.
Nat Chem Biol ; 12(10): 795-801, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27501397

ABSTRACT

Clinical resistance to the second-generation antiandrogen enzalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), despite persistent androgen receptor (AR) activity in tumors, highlights an unmet medical need for next-generation antagonists. We have identified and characterized tetra-aryl cyclobutanes (CBs) as a new class of competitive AR antagonists that exhibit a unique mechanism of action. These CBs are structurally distinct from current antiandrogens (hydroxyflutamide, bicalutamide, and enzalutamide) and inhibit AR-mediated gene expression, cell proliferation, and tumor growth in several models of CRPC. Conformational profiling revealed that CBs stabilize an AR conformation resembling an unliganded receptor. Using a variety of techniques, it was determined that the AR-CB complex was not recruited to AR-regulated promoters and, like apo AR, remains sequestered in the cytoplasm, bound to heat shock proteins. Thus, we have identified third-generation AR antagonists whose unique mechanism of action suggests that they may have therapeutic potential in CRPC.


Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Cell Nucleus/drug effects , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Structure-Activity Relationship
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...