Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy study: Outcomes and risk factors of conversion during minimally invasive lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Conversion to thoracotomy continues to be a concern during minimally invasive lobectomy. The aim of this propensity-matched cohort study is to analyze the outcomes and risk factors of intraoperative conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic lobectomy (RL). METHODS: Data from consecutive lobectomy cases performed for clinical stage IA to IIIA lung cancer was retrospectively collected from the Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy study consortium of 21 institutions from 2011 to 2019. The propensity-score method of inverse-probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the baseline characteristics across surgical approaches. Univariate logistic regression models were applied to test risk factors for conversion. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted using a stepwise model selection method. RESULTS: Seven thousand two hundred sixteen patients undergoing lobectomy were identified: RL (n = 2968), VATS (n = 2831), and open lobectomy (n = 1417). RL had lower conversion rate compared with VATS (3.6% vs 12.9%; P < .0001). In the multivariable regression model, tumor size and neoadjuvant therapy were the most significant risk factors for conversion, followed by prior cardiac surgery, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, VATS approach, male gender, body mass index, and forced expiratory volume in 1 minute. Conversions for anatomical reasons were more common in VATS than RL (66.6% vs 45.6%; P = .0002); however, conversions for vascular reasons were more common in RL than VATS (24.8% vs 14%; P = .01). The rate of emergency conversions was comparable between RL and VATS (0.5% vs 0.7%; P = .25) with no intraoperative mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: Converted minimally invasive lobectomies were not associated with worse perioperative mortality compared with open lobectomy. Compared with VATS lobectomy, RL is associated with a lower probability of conversion in this propensity-score matched cohort study.

Transsternal Approach for Broncho-Pleural Fistula Closure After Right Pneumonectomy.

Broncho-pleural fistula (BPF) is an abnormal communication between the bronchial lumen and the pleural space that typically occurs postoperatively. Surgical intervention is typically needed to patch the fistula; however, current literature lacks a gold standard for which treatment to use. With a high mortality rate, there is a clear urgency for quick and successful intervention. This case examines a 59-year-old patient presenting with a BPF 14 years after incidental pneumonectomy during upper lobectomy for invasive aspergillus. A fistula was appreciated during bronchoscopy with contrast injection. The fistula was closed via the transsternal approach through median sternotomy and pericardiotomy. This case report aims to provide a viable option to successfully repair a BPF via the transsternal approach.

The Scan, the Needle, or the Knife? National Trends in Diagnosing Stage I Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Indeterminate lung nodules have been increasingly discovered since the expansion of lung cancer screening programs. The diagnostic approach for suspicious nodules varies based on institutional resources and preferences. The aim of this study is to analyze factors associated with diagnostic modalities used for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for all patients with stage I NSCLC from 2004 to 2015. Four diagnostic modalities were identified, including clinical radiography alone (CRA), bronchial cytology (BC), procedural biopsy (PB), and surgical biopsy (SB). A multivariable multinomial logistic regression was used to assess associations of patient demographics, cancer characteristics, and facility characteristics with these modalities. RESULTS: Of 250,614 patients, 4,233 (1.7%) had CRA, 5,226 (2.1%) had BC, 147,621 (59.9%) had PB, and 93,534 (37.3%) had SB. Older patients were more likely to receive CRA (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 5.3) and less likely to receive SB (ORadj = 0.73). Black patients were less likely to receive SB (ORadj = 0.83) and more likely to receive BC (ORadj = 1.31). Private insurance was associated with SB (ORadj = 1.11), whereas Medicaid was associated with BC (ORadj = 1.21). Patients more than 50 miles from the facility were more likely to undergo SB (ORadj = 1.25 vs PB; ORadj = 1.30 vs CRA; ORadj = 1.38 vs BC). Patients receiving SB had shorter days from diagnosis to treatment (23.0 vs 53.5 to 64.7 for other modalities, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic SB to confirm early-stage NSCLC was associated with younger age, greater travel distance, and shorter time to treatment in comparison with other modalities. Black race and non-private insurance were less likely to be associated with SB.

A Rare Complication of Esophageal Exclusion: Esophageal Mucocele.

Bipolar esophageal exclusion is a "Hail Mary" procedure for control of leak and persistent mediastinal soilage from esophageal injury. Usually, the esophageal remnant scars down without negative consequences. Esophageal mucocele is a rare complication of bipolar esophageal exclusion. This is a case report of an iatrogenic esophageal transection and the subsequent treatment course. A retrospective chart review of the patient's medical and surgical history was performed. After a robotic hiatal hernia repair at an outside institution, the patient suffered an esophageal leak and was surgically treated with esophageal exclusion, wide drainage of the mediastinum, and decortication of the resulting empyema. She subsequently underwent retrosternal gastric conduit for esophageal reconstruction 4 months later. Three years after this, she developed a rare complication of esophageal exclusion, a symptomatic esophageal mucocele that required resection.

Tracheobronchoplasty for tracheobronchomalacia.

Tracheobronchoplasty (TBP) consists of splinting of the posterior membranous wall of the central airways with the goal of restoring a normal configuration and preventing excessive collapse in patients with tracheobronchomalacia (TBM). Despite some variation in technique, it consists of sewing a mesh on the posterior membranous wall of the trachea and both main stem bronchi. Traditionally performed through a right posterolateral thoracotomy, it should be reserved for cases of severe TBM. Surgical exposure necessitates dissection of the trachea from the thoracic inlet to the carina, as well the right main stem bronchus, bronchus intermedius and left main stem bronchus. Airway management in the operating room requires manipulation of the endotracheal tube (ETT) to allow safe placement of the sutures without puncturing the balloon. Other key technical considerations include downsizing of the airway with the mesh, and appropriate spacing of the sutures to ensure a plicating effect of the posterior membranous wall. More recently the robotic platform was used to perform TBP surgery. Its fine precise wristed motion and excellent visualization offer potential advantages over a thoracotomy and early outcomes of robotic-assisted TBP are encouraging. Longitudinal follow-up is still necessary to ensure the durability of repair in a patient population with significant underlying respiratory co-morbidities.

Robotic Transgastric Reconstruction of the Double Lumen Esophagus.

Double lumen esophagus is an extremely rare condition, developing in most cases as a complication of antireflux procedures or gastroesophageal reflux itself secondary to the severe inflammatory process in and around the lower esophagus. We describe a case of iatrogenic double lumen esophagus after multiple previous Nissen fundoplications for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. There is no standard surgical intervention for the management of this complication. We present a first report of successful robot-assisted surgical reconstruction of a double lumen esophagus.

Minimally Invasive Diaphragm Plication for Acquired Unilateral Diaphragm Paralysis: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Diaphragm paralysis is a relatively uncommon entity that can be both congenital and acquired in nature. While commonly asymptomatic, it can also cause a significant decrease in pulmonary function and reserve, particularly in patients with underlying pulmonary diseases. Our aim was to summarize the current literature regarding the minimally invasive techniques used in the surgical correction of acquired diaphragm paralysis via traditional and robotic minimally invasive approaches. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of available literature using the Cochrane methodology and reported findings according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. Results: A total of 6,561 citations were identified through initial database and reference searches, of which 90 articles met the inclusion criteria for review. After further assessment, 33 appropriate full-text studies were selected for the review. Of the selected publications, the majority represented case reports and single-center retrospective studies with level of evidence 4. Only 1 level 2b study (individual cohort study) was identified, comparing minimally invasive and open approaches. Conclusions: Each of the minimally invasive approaches has its unique benefits and disadvantages, which are summarized and delineated in this article. Ultimately, no preferred method of diaphragm plication for diaphragm paralysis can be recommended at this time based on clinical data. The choice of procedure and surgical approach continues to be selected based on the surgeon's experience and preference.

Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study).

INTRODUCTION: We report the results of the first prospective international randomized control trial to compare the perioperative outcome and surgical radicality of the robotic approach with those of traditional video-assisted surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage T1-T2, N0-N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection arms. The primary objective was the incidence of adverse events including complications and conversion to thoracotomy. The secondary objectives included extent of lymph node (LN) dissection and other indicators. RESULTS: This trial was closed at 83 cases as the probability of concluding in favor of the robot arm for the primary outcome was null according to the observed trend. In this study, we report the results of the analysis conducted on the patients enrolled until trial suspension. Thirty-nine cases were randomized in the VATS arm and 38 in the robotic arm. Six patients were excluded from analysis. Despite finding no difference between the two arms in perioperative complications, conversions, duration of surgery, or duration of postoperative stay, a significantly greater degree of LN assessment by the robotic technique was observed in regards to the median number of sampled LN stations [6, interquartile range (IQR) 4-6 vs. 4, IQR 3-5; p = 0.0002], hilar LNs (7, IQR 5-10 vs. 4, IQR 2-7; p = 0.0003), and mediastinal LNs (7, IQR 5-10 vs. 5, IQR 3-7; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial demonstrated that RATS was not superior to VATS considering the perioperative outcome for early-stage NSCLC, but the robotic approach allowed an improvement of LN dissection. Further studies are suggested to validate the results of this trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02804893.

Surgical Management of Early Esophageal Cancer.

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide, and its incidence has been increasing over the past several decades. Esophagectomy currently is the standard of care for more advanced early esophageal cancer and should be performed at centers of excellence with high volumes, appropriate supportive staff, and multidisciplinary expertise.

Salvage Esophagectomy.

Salvage esophagectomy is an option for patients with recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy or those who undergo active surveillance after induction chemoradiation therapy. Salvage resection is associated with higher rates of morbidity compared with planned esophagectomy but offers patients with locally advanced disease a chance at improved long-term survival. Salvage resection should be preferentially performed in a multidisciplinary setting by high-volume and experienced surgeons. Technical considerations, such as prior radiation dosage, radiation field, and choice of conduit, should be taken into account.

Surveillance Following Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.

We describe the surveillance strategies after esophageal cancer treatment, whether local therapy, induction chemoradiation, or other definitive treatment such as trimodality therapy. We discuss the shortcomings of the different invasive and imaging studies, and the recommended stage-specific surveillance after local and organ-sparing approaches to esophageal cancer treatment.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy: techniques and outcomes.

Achalasia is progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the esophagus, resulting in uncoordinated esophageal motility and failure of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, leading to impaired swallowing. Surgical myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter, either open or minimally invasive, has been a standard of care for the past several decades. Recently, new procedure-peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been introduced into clinical practice. This procedure accomplishes the same objective of controlled myotomy only via endoscopic approach. In the current chapter authors review the present state, clinical applications, outcomes and future directions of the POEM procedure.

Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Thymic Carcinoma: Demographics, Treatment, and Survival.

OBJECTIVE: Although rare, thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNET) and thymic carcinoma (TC) are the most common thymic nonthymomatous malignancies; their survival outcomes have not been thoroughly compared. We analyzed the clinical, treatment, and survival characteristics of TNET and TC. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with a histologic diagnosis of TNET or TC in the National Cancer Database (2004 to 2015). Exclusion criteria were age <18 years and unstaged tumors. Descriptive statistics, survival analysis, and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used in elucidating associations. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred eighty-nine patients were included (TNET: 19.8%). Patients with TNET were significantly younger (57 vs 62.5 years), more likely to be male (70.5% vs 60.0%), and have localized tumors (45.4% vs 32.3%). Patients with TC more frequently underwent chemotherapy (56.1% vs 34.9%), radiation (56.9% vs 39.3%), and trimodality therapy (21.3% vs 11.5%), while resection rates were similar (55.3% vs 58.3%). The 5-year survival was 62% for TNET and 52% for TC, but comparable following multivariable adjustment. Age, stage, and Charlson-Deyo score were negative predictors of survival, while surgery and trimodality therapy were positive predictors. On subanalysis, adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) improved the survival of margin-positive tumors and was an independent predictor of survival for both tumor types (hazard ratio = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of the largest series of TNET and TC showed a survival rate surpassing 50% at 5 years. These outcomes seem to be influenced by surgical resection and ART. Standardized staging and surgical protocols including lymph node sampling are still warranted to better elucidate the treatment algorithm of these tumors.

Tailoring Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains on the rise. Pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial, revolving around an incompetent esophagogastric junction as an antireflux barrier, with other comorbid conditions contributing to the disease. Proton pump inhibitors remain the most common treatment of GERD. Endoscopic therapy has gained popularity as a less invasive option. The presence of esophageal dysmotility complicates the choice of surgical fundoplication. Most literature demonstrates that fundoplication is safe in the setting of ineffective or weak peristalsis and that postoperative dysphagia cannot be predicted by preoperative manometry parameters. More data are needed on the merits of endoluminal approaches to GERD.

Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments for Achalasia: Who to Treat and How?

Achalasia is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by failure of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and altered motility of the esophagus. The traditional, highly effective, surgical approach to relieve obstruction at the LES includes cardiomyotomy. Fundoplication is added to decrease risk of postoperative reflux. Per oral endoscopic myotomy is a new endoscopic procedure that allows division of the LES via transoral route. It has several advantages including less invasiveness, cosmesis, and tailored approach to the length on the myotomy. However, it is associated with increased rate of post-procedural reflux. Various endoscopic interventions are used to address this problem.

Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments for Gastroparesis: What to Do and Whom to Treat?

Gastroparesis is a complex chronic debilitating condition of gastric motility resulting in the delayed gastric emptying and multiple severe symptoms, which may lead to malnutrition and dehydration. Initial management of patients with gastroparesis focuses on the diet, lifestyle modification and medical therapy. Various endoscopic and surgical interventions are reserved for refractory cases of gastroparesis, not responding to conservative therapy. Pyloric interventions, enteral access tubes, gastric electrical stimulator and gastrectomy have been described in the care of patients with gastroparesis. In this article, the authors review current management, indications, and contraindications to these procedures.