Obesity is a significant risk factor for ileostomy site incisional hernia following reversal.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia following ileostomy reversal can cause significant morbidity, impaired quality of life, and burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of ileostomy site incisional hernia following reversal and to identify possible risk factors for its development. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study involving consecutive patients who underwent ileostomy reversal between November 1999 to February 2015 by a single surgeon. Primary outcome analysed was incisional hernia occurrence at the previous stoma site. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-four ileostomy reversals were identified. The most common indication for ileostomy construction was colorectal cancer, followed by inflammatory bowel disease and diverticulosis. The stomas were either a loop (75%), end-loop (24%) or end ileostomy (1%). The mean time interval from the stoma creation to reversal was 6.1 months (range 2-69, SD 7.1). After a mean follow-up of 30.7 months (range 10-89, SD 15.1), 12 patients (5%) developed a hernia at the previous stoma. The mean time for hernia occurrence was 25.2 months (range 3-126, SD 32). Patients who developed ileostomy site incisional hernia were more likely to have a higher body mass index (28.1 versus 26.3, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Although we found a lower rate of incisional hernias after reversal of ileostomies than reported elsewhere in the literature, it remains a significant clinical problem. Obesity is a significant risk factor for ileostomy-site incisional hernia.

Clinical significance of appendiceal diverticulum: a significant marker for appendiceal neoplasia in Australian patients.

INTRODUCTION: Diverticula of the appendix (DA) have a reported incidence of up to 2.1%. They are primarily detected incidentally, through imaging and intraoperative or histologic diagnosis. This study's objective was to examine the prevalence of DA, and its relationship with inflammation and neoplasia, as well as review the literature with respect to clinical outcomes and ability to identify DA preoperatively. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective search of all patients undergoing an appendicectomy for right lower quadrant pain at a single institution between 2004 and 2017 was conducted. Histopathology reports for evidence of DA, location of the DA, presence of inflammation, and any relationship between DA and neoplasms (adenoma, carcinoma, carcinoid, lymphoma, and mucinous neoplasm) within the appendix were reviewed. Clinical notes, operative records, and preoperative imaging were also reviewed. RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred eleven patient were included in the study, with a mean age of 34 years, with acute appendicitis found in 82.5%. 31.6% of patients with DA had associated inflammation of the DA. DA was present in 57 patients (2.1%), with 55 patients in the total cohort having neoplasia (2.0%). Patients with DAs were ten times more likely to have appendicular neoplasm than patients without a DA (17.5 vs 1.8%; p < 0.0001, OR 11.8 95%, CI 5.6-24.8). CONCLUSION: This is the first Australian study demonstrating DAs are a significant marker of appendiceal neoplasm. Appendicectomy in all incidentally discovered diverticulum should be considered. Due to a paucity of data, research is required into this area to assess for the need for endoscopy following diagnosis.