Low recurrent thrombosis rates in single positive antiphospholipid syndrome regardless of type of anticoagulation.

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) is characterized by thrombosis and persistently positive tests for antiphospholipid antibodies or lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Triple-positive APS has the highest risk of recurrent thrombosis, but no studies have focused on recurrent thrombosis in patients with single-positive TAPS. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with single-positive TAPS diagnosed at Lifespan Health System, Rhode Island, to determine the rates and risk factors for recurrent thrombosis. Between January 2001 and April 2022, 128 patients were assessed who had single-positive APS (LAC = 98, aCL = 21, aß2GPI = 9) and who had been followed for a total of 1453.8 patient-years (median follow-up 3.04 years). The initial antithrombotic regimen was warfarin in 44 %, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in 34 %, enoxaparin in 2 %, and no antithrombotic therapy or antiplatelet therapy only in 20 %. Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 16 (12.5 %) with a recurrent thrombosis rate of 3.08 per 100 patient-years. Systemic lupus erythematosus was the only variable significantly associated with recurrent thrombosis in a model adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and type of positive APS test. All 16 patients with recurrent thrombosis were initially treated with warfarin, and, at the time of recurrent thrombosis, 13 patients remained on warfarin and three were off anticoagulation. In conclusion, the recurrent thrombosis rate in single-positive APS is low, and not all patients with a single-positive test may need indefinite anticoagulation with warfarin. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm this finding and establish optimal anticoagulation regimens for low-risk TAPS.

Choice of anticoagulation in patients with low risk antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired hypercoagulable state necessitating long-term anticoagulation for secondary thrombosis prevention. Anticoagulation guidelines are predominantly based on data in high risk, triple positive patients, and favor Vitamin K antagonists over other forms of anticoagulation. The efficacy of alternative anticoagulants for secondary thrombosis prevention in low risk, single and double positive APS remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the incidence of recurrent thrombosis and major bleeding for patient with low risk APS on long-term anticoagulation. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who met revised criteria for thrombotic APS between January, 2001 and April, 2021 and received care through the Lifespan Health System. Primary outcomes included recurrent thrombosis and WHO Grades 3 and 4 major bleeding. A total of 190 patients were followed over a median duration of 3.1 years. At time of APS diagnosis, 89 patients were treated with warfarin and 59 patients with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). There were similar rates of recurrent thrombosis in low risk patients on warfarin versus DOACs (adjusted IRR 6.91; 95% CI 0.90-53.40, p = 0.064). Major bleeding events only occurred in low risk patients on warfarin (n = 8, log-rank p = 0.13). In conclusion, despite the choice of anticoagulation, patients with low risk APS had similar rates of recurrent thrombosis suggesting DOACs may be a potential treatment option for this cohort. There was a non-significant increase in major bleeding rates in low risk patients on warfarin versus DOACs. Study limitations include a retrospective study design and small event numbers.

Where's My Doctor? The Impact of the Primary Oncologist's Visit with Their Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Continuity of care is a cornerstone of the patient-practitioner relationship. Previously, patient satisfaction has been related to perceived provider communication skills and competence. Our study assessed the relationship between the inpatient continuity visit (ICV), a face-to-face patient-provider interaction with the primary oncologist, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Subjects were adult inpatients on the oncology unit at The Miriam Hospital who had an oncologist at the hospital-based cancer center. A survey, given at discharge, included a 5-point Likert scale ranging from greatly worsened to greatly improved satisfaction to assess the impact of the ICV on patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Of 75 participants, 43 (57.3%) reported a visit by their outpatient oncologist. Of these, 39 (90.7%) reported that this visit either greatly or somewhat improved satisfaction with their hospital stay. Of subjects who had a single ICV, 93.7% reported either greatly or somewhat improved satisfaction compared to 88.9% who had more than one visit. Of 32 (43.3%) subjects who did not receive a visit, 15.6% reported that the lack of visit either greatly or somewhat worsened their satisfaction during their hospital stay, while 84.4% reported no impact. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that an ICV improves satisfaction of care in cancer patients on a hospitalist service, and a lack of ICV negatively impacted satisfaction. There was no improvement in satisfaction for multiple versus single ICVs. While the practicality of this intervention should be reassessed with the emergence of more accessible telehealth modalities, the efficacy of a single visit to improve satisfaction is informative.

Temporal Trends in Sepsis Incidence and Mortality in Patients With Cancer in the US Population.

BACKGROUND: Few population-based studies assess the impact of cancer on sepsis incidence and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate epidemiological trends of sepsis in patients with cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults (≥20 years old) identified using sepsis-indicator International Classification of Diseases codes from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2006-2014). A generalized linear model was used to trend incidence and mortality. Outcomes in patients with cancer and patients without cancer were compared using propensity score matching. Cox regression modeling was used to calculate hazard ratios for mortality rates. RESULTS: The study included 13 996 374 patients, 13.6% of whom had cancer. Gram-positive infections were most common, but the incidence of gram-negative infections increased at a greater rate. Compared with patients without cancer, those with cancer had significantly higher rates of lower respiratory tract (35.0% vs 31.6%), intra-abdominal (5.5% vs 4.6%), fungal (4.8% vs 2.9%), and anaerobic (1.2% vs 0.9%) infections. Sepsis incidence increased at a higher rate in patients with cancer than in those without cancer, but hospital mortality rates improved equally in both groups. After propensity score matching, hospital mortality was higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.24-1.26). Of patients with sepsis and cancer, those with lung cancer had the lowest survival (hazard ratio, 1.65) compared with those with breast cancer, who had the highest survival. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients are at high risk for sepsis and associated mortality. Research is needed to guide sepsis monitoring and prevention in patients with cancer.

Tumor lysis syndrome risk in outpatient versus inpatient administration of venetoclax and hypomethlators for acute myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax along with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is the new standard therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not fit for intensive frontline induction chemotherapy. Venetoclax is associated with fatal episodes of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and recommendations are for its initiation for CLL and AML in the inpatient setting with close monitoring. Herein, we evaluated the safety of outpatient venetoclax ramp up when given in addition to HMAs for the treatment of AML. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with AML at our institution from 12/1/2016 until 7/1/2020. We identified patients who received HMAs and venetoclax for AML, either as frontline or relapsed/refractory therapy. Records were reviewed for evidence of laboratory or clinical tumor lysis episodes in all patients. RESULTS: Between 12/1/2016 and 7/1/2020 43, patients at our institution received venetoclax/HMA for the treatment of AML. Thirty-nine patients (91%) had venetoclax initiation and ramp up in the outpatient setting. One episode of laboratory TLS (2.5%) was identified. This patient required admission to the hospital for rasburicase and IV fluids with resolution of the laboratory effects without resultant clinical TLS. There were no episodes of clinical TLS in either group. Thirty-day mortality from venetoclax initiation was 0% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our experience with HMAs and venetoclax showed that outpatient ramp up of venetoclax is safe with a very low risk of laboratory TLS (2.5%) and no evidence of clinical TLS within our cohort.

Molecular Profiles of Brain and Pulmonary Metastatic Disease in Cancer of Unknown Primary.

Cancers of unknown primary (CUP) are histologically confirmed malignancies but for which further investigation cannot identify a primary site. Improvements in histopathologic modalities for diagnosis have lessened the frequency of CUPs to 3%-5% of all malignancies compared with historical estimates of 5%-10%. Despite this, there is an ongoing debate as to whether CUPs are malignancies where the primary is not found or if they are otherwise a fully separate entity. Improvements in molecular analysis holds promise for improved identification and treatment of CUPs with mixed preliminary results. Here we present a woman with CUP and metastases in her brain and lung. We performed genomic profiling to compare the molecular makeup of each site in order to establish treatment targets. KEY POINTS: Cancer of unknown primary remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Molecular analysis may provide improvements in diagnosis and novel treatment options. Different sites of metastatic disease have subtle variations in molecular profile. Sequencing of different sites may offer therapeutic options that are either already approved or available in clinical trial.

Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrence in Multiply Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: To date, evidence for the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been limited to case series and open-label clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of FMT for treatment of recurrent CDI. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01703494). SETTING: Two academic medical centers. PATIENTS: 46 patients who had 3 or more recurrences of CDI and received a full course of vancomycin for their most recent acute episode. INTERVENTION: Fecal microbiota transplantation with donor stool (heterologous) or patient's own stool (autologous) administered by colonoscopy. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was resolution of diarrhea without the need for further anti-CDI therapy during the 8-week follow-up. Safety data were compared between treatment groups via review of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and new medical conditions for 6 months after FMT. Fecal microbiota analyses were performed on patients' stool before and after FMT and also on donors' stool. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, 20 of 22 patients (90.9%) in the donor FMT group achieved clinical cure compared with 15 of 24 (62.5%) in the autologous FMT group (P = 0.042). Resolution after autologous FMT differed by site (9 of 10 vs. 6 of 14 [P = 0.033]). All 9 patients who developed recurrent CDI after autologous FMT were free of further CDI after subsequent donor FMT. There were no SAEs related to FMT. Donor FMT restored gut bacterial community diversity and composition to resemble that of healthy donors. LIMITATION: The study included only patients who had 3 or more recurrences and excluded those who were immunocompromised and aged 75 years or older. CONCLUSION: Donor stool administered via colonoscopy seemed safe and was more efficacious than autologous FMT in preventing further CDI episodes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Correlates of irritability in college students with depressive symptoms.

Depression is a prevalent psychiatric disorder associated with significant personal and societal burden. There is accumulating evidence for the presence of a subtype of depression characterized by the presence of irritability that is associated with increased morbidity, risk for suicidal ideation, and functional impairments in adults. Little is known about the features of depressive symptoms with and without irritability among young adults in college. The primary aim of this study was to characterize the presentation of college students with depressive symptoms and irritability. Two-hundred eighty-seven undergraduate college students with depressive symptoms with and without irritability were compared across several psychiatric and functional outcome variables. Independent samples t-tests or logistic regressions were conducted for each outcome variable using the irritability item of the Beck Depression Inventory as a dichotomous grouping variable. Analyses were conducted separately for the men and the women. Both male and female students with depressive symptoms and severe irritability reported a greater severity of depressive symptoms compared with their peers with no or mild irritability. In the women, the presence of irritability was associated with greater symptoms of anxiety, whereas in the men, it was associated with increased likelihood of engaging in risky behaviors, including compulsive use of alcohol, illicit drugs, and prescription drugs. The male and female college students with depressive symptoms with and without irritability did not differ on severity of suicidal ideation, hopelessness, or cognitive functioning. The findings from this study suggest that depressive symptoms and irritability may characterize a subtype of college students who have a greater symptom burden and with the potential need for more aggressive and prompt treatment.