A case of pediatric serum sickness like reaction (SSLR) after a 2-month re-exposure to amoxicillin.

BACKGROUND: Serum-sickness like reactions (SSLRs) to amoxicillin have been documented in the medical literature. Beta-lactams are important and commonly used medications especially in the pediatric population. Often, SSLRs present within days of and during first exposure/ingestion to the offending agent. We described a unique case of a 4-year-old boy who presented with symptoms of amoxicillin SSLR following his second course of amoxicillin with only 2 months and 10 days between his second and first course. CASE PRESENTATION: A 4-year-old boy presented to hospital with a pruritic rash on day 7 of a 10-day course of amoxicillin for otitis media accompanied by fever (38.7 degrees Celsius). On day 7 of his second course of amoxicillin, which was separated from his first course by only 2 months and 10 days, his mother noticed erythematous, raised, pruritic lesions with central clearing on his sternum. He presented to the ED with emesis, progression of the rash to his torso, back, legs, and face, hypotension, angioedema, and joint pain. His bloodwork demonstrated a leukocytosis of 18.6 × 109 g/L with neutrophilic predominance and thrombocytosis with a platelet count of 653 × 109 g/L. He was treated with 5 mg oral cetirizine daily and 1 mg/kg oral prednisone which improved his rash and angioedema. He was managed with up to 4 times the usual dose of cetirizine. He was assessed in our outpatient clinic as an outpatient and penicillin skin testing was unremarkable. A diagnosis of a probable SSLR to amoxicillin was made. CONCLUSION: We report an unusual presentation of SSLR following re-exposure to amoxicillin. Our case highlights that patients with previous asymptomatic exposure to amoxicillin can develop SSLR with repeat exposure. Although it is not uncommon for children to develop amoxicillin SSLRs after previous exposure to the drug, this case is unique because of its short time course of 2 months and 10 days months between drug courses. Penicillins are commonly used in the pediatric population. Therefore, it is important to correctly characterize adverse drug reactions to broaden our understanding of SSLRs, prevent unnecessary avoidance of the triggering agent, and improve patient management.

Effect of preoperative cannabis use on perioperative outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The reported use of cannabis within surgical population is increasing. Cannabis use is potentially associated with increased harms and varied effects on pain control. These have important implications to perioperative care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing surgical patients reporting cannabis use preoperatively to control patients with no cannabis exposure, in a 1:2 ratio. To control for confounding, we used a propensity score-matched analysis to assess the adjusted association between cannabis use and study outcomes. Our primary outcome was a composite of (1) respiratory arrest or cardiac arrest, (2) intensive care admission, (3) stroke, (4) myocardial infarction and (5) mortality during this hospital stay. Secondarily, we assessed the effects on pain control, opioid usage, induction agent dose and nausea-vomiting. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and March 2019, we captured 1818 patients consisting of cannabis users (606) and controls (1212). For propensity score-matched analyses, 524 cannabis patients were compared with 1152 control patients. No difference in the incidence of composite outcome was observed (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.98). Although a higher incidence of arrhythmias (2.7% vs 1.6%) and decreased incidence of nausea-vomiting needing treatment (9.6% vs 12.6%) was observed with cannabis users vs controls, results were not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed with other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results do not demonstrate a convincing association between self-reported cannabis use and major surgical outcomes or pain management. Perioperative decisions should be made based on considerations of dose, duration, and indication.

On taking the STING out of immune activation.

Nearly a decade ago, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) adaptor protein called stimulator of interferon genes (STING) was found to be critical in the induction of type I IFN production in response to DNA virus infection. STING functions by sensing cytoplasmic DNA and activates key transcription factors, including IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-3 and IRF7, to initiate type I IFN expression. Type I IFNs are vital in immunity against viral infections and can influence cancer cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis. Several studies have shown that STING activation results in potent antitumor activity by generating strong tumor-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses. Moreover, compared with wild-type, STING-knockout mice show greater susceptibility to viral infections. In this review, we discuss the importance of STING signaling during the induction of immune responses, especially those associated with type I IFN in viral infections and tumor immunity. Furthermore, we highlight recent data that unravel how the STING signaling pathway can be negatively regulated.