Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 164
Filter
2.
J Cytol ; 41(1): 28-33, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282807

ABSTRACT

Context: SARS-CoV-2 virus causes COVID-19 by infecting nasal and oral cavities primarily by attaching its spike proteins to ACE 2 receptors expressed in epithelial cells. Aim: This study was done to evaluate the micronucleated cell count, metanuclear abnormalities, and genotoxic factor in exfoliated buccal mucosal cell among the COVID-19 suspected patients. Settings and Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted at AIIMS, Mangalagiri, between August and October 2022. Methods: One hundred COVID-19 suspected patients were recruited for this study after obtaining informed and written consent; buccal smear was obtained and stained for papanicolaou test (PAP). The PAP-stained slides were analyzed for micronuclei (MN), pyknotic, karyolytic, and karyorrhexic cell count, respectively. Based on their reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) report, the patients were grouped into COVID-19 positive and negative groups. Statistical Analysis: The genotoxicity factor was calculated using the micronucleated cell count from both the groups using mean and standard deviation. Results: The MN, micronucleated cell, pyknotic, karyolitic, and karyorrhexic cell count in COVID-19 positive patients were 24.12, 15.24, 3.08, 2.88 and 4.40, respectively, than COVID-19 negative patients 5.69, 8.17, 1.08, 1.00 and 2.43, respectively. The genotoxicity factor for SARS-CoV-2 was 2.68 which is a positive genotoxic effect on buccal mucosal cells. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 increases the expression of micronucleated cells, pyknotic cells, karyolytic cells, and karyorhexic cells and concludes SARS-CoV-2 is having cytogenotoxic effect on the buccal mucosal cells. This can be used as a reliable marker in identifying the early carcinogenic effects of virus causing COVID-19.

3.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 74(5): 315-319, Septiembre - Octubre 2023. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-225519

ABSTRACT

Aim A simple and reliable method for diagnosing COVID 19 infections is the needed. The role of saliva in the transmission of the infection has already been established. Method Saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs from patients suspected to have COVID 19 infections were taken simultaneously, and the results of the RT-PCR were compared. Result Total 405 samples were collected, of which 250 males and 155 females. In the 391 samples included for analysis, 370 (94.63%) samples were found to have concordance results, and 21 (5.37%) samples had discordant results. Conclusion The use of saliva to diagnose COVID 19 infection is reliable, and its use can be recommended. (AU)


Objetivo Un método simple y confiable para diagnosticar infecciones por COVID 19 es necesario. Ya se ha establecido el papel de la saliva en la transmisión de la infección. Método Se tomaron simultáneamente hisopos de saliva y nasofaríngeos de pacientes con sospecha de infección por COVID 19 y se compararon los resultados de la RT-PCR. Resultado Se recogieron 405 muestras, de las cuales 250 hombres y 155 mujeres. En las 391 muestras incluidas para el análisis, se encontró que 370 (94,63%) muestras tenían resultados de concordancia y 21 (5,37%) muestras tenían resultados discordantes. Conclusión El uso de la saliva para diagnosticar la infección por COVID 19 es confiable y se puede recomendar su uso. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Saliva/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Nasopharynx/enzymology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/enzymology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/immunology
4.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 27(3): 380-384, Jul.-Sept. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1514237

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Tinnitus is one of the most common otological complaints encountered. Patients often use the internet, especially YouTube videos, as a source of information regarding their health condition. There is a need to analyze the standard and quality of information in these videos so that the patients receive correct information. Objective The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and utility of YouTube videos on tinnitus. Methods The first 100 videos on YouTube using the search terms tinnitus and ringing in the ear were identified. Three subject experts assessed the reliability using the modified five-point DISCERN score and utility using a usefulness score. Various indices like view ratio, like ratio, video power index, and interaction index were also calculated. Results Out of the 100 videos selected, 34 were excluded; collectively the remaining 66 videos were viewed 12,797,730 times. The most common upload sources were hospital/physician (39%), paramedic health care providers (19%), and alternative medicine (19%). The discern score was the highest in hospital/physician group (mean 19.3) and lowest in patient experience group (mean 13.4). A negative correlation was observed between the number of views (correlation coefficient -0.214), number of likes (correlation coefficient -0.242), number of comments (correlation coefficient -0.242), and the usefulness score. Conclusion Although there are multiple videos on YouTube regarding tinnitus, the overall educational content and reliability of the videos are poor. Video popularity is not associated with usefulness. Healthcare providers should counsel patients regarding videos on YouTube and try to create more comprehensive videos.

5.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 27(3): e380-e384, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37564464

ABSTRACT

Introduction Tinnitus is one of the most common otological complaints encountered. Patients often use the internet, especially YouTube videos, as a source of information regarding their health condition. There is a need to analyze the standard and quality of information in these videos so that the patients receive correct information. Objective The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and utility of YouTube videos on tinnitus. Methods The first 100 videos on YouTube using the search terms tinnitus and ringing in the ear were identified. Three subject experts assessed the reliability using the modified five-point DISCERN score and utility using a usefulness score. Various indices like view ratio, like ratio, video power index, and interaction index were also calculated. Results Out of the 100 videos selected, 34 were excluded; collectively the remaining 66 videos were viewed 12,797,730 times. The most common upload sources were hospital/physician (39%), paramedic health care providers (19%), and alternative medicine (19%). The discern score was the highest in hospital/physician group (mean 19.3) and lowest in patient experience group (mean 13.4). A negative correlation was observed between the number of views (correlation coefficient -0.214), number of likes (correlation coefficient -0.242), number of comments (correlation coefficient -0.242), and the usefulness score. Conclusion Although there are multiple videos on YouTube regarding tinnitus, the overall educational content and reliability of the videos are poor. Video popularity is not associated with usefulness. Healthcare providers should counsel patients regarding videos on YouTube and try to create more comprehensive videos.

6.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 75(2): 1040-1044, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37275106

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is an essential component of thyroid cytopathology, particularly important in thyroid lymphoma, anaplastic carcinoma, metastasis to avoid unnecessary surgery. Follicular epithelial neoplasms are the most common tumors arising from the thyroid, whereas primary thyroid lymphomas are uncommon, accounting for less than 5% of all thyroid malignancies. Case description: A 45-year-old male patient presented to our ENT outpatient department with swelling in the anterior neck for 3 years duration. Non-aspirational needling was done along with rapid on-site evaluation using 1% aq. toluidine blue and was reported as Malignant thyroid neoplasm- possibility of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Cellblock sample also confirmed as B-cell NHL followed by Immunohistochemistry. Discussion: Primary thyroid lymphomas (PTL) are uncommon malignant neoplasms. They represent < 5% of all thyroid malignancies and 1-2% of all extra-nodal lymphomas. If diagnosed cytologically, unnecessary surgery can be avoided in thyroid lymphoma. ROSE helps in the rapid diagnosis and sample adequacy. Cellblock can avoid the biopsy procedure used for confirmation and subtyping of lymphoma.

7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36965822

ABSTRACT

AIM: A simple and reliable method for diagnosing COVID 19 infections is the needed. The role of saliva in the transmission of the infection has already been established. METHOD: Saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs from patients suspected to have COVID 19 infections were taken simultaneously, and the results of the RT-PCR were compared. RESULT: Total 405 samples were collected, of which 250 males and 155 females. In the 391 samples included for analysis, 370 (94.63%) samples were found to have concordance results, and 21 (5.37%) samples had discordant results. CONCLUSION: The use of saliva to diagnose COVID 19 infection is reliable, and its use can be recommended.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Female , Male , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Saliva , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Nasopharynx , COVID-19 Testing
8.
Neurol Sci ; 44(1): 129-135, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35994134

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dizziness is an important symptom presenting in routine practice and the life time prevalence ranges from 17 to 30%. Persistent positional perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a common cause of chronic dizziness and has often been labeled as psychogenic dizziness in the past. DISCUSSION: PPPD is diagnosed based on clinical criteria laid down by the Barany society. The vestibular function tests and imaging of the brain and the inner ear are often normal. Most of the patients have an underlying anxiety trait and most cases of PPPD arise following an attack of acute vertigo like Meniere's disease and vestibular neuritis. It is important to differentiate the condition from bilateral vestibulopathy. There is no role of vestibular sedative in the treatment of such condition. Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) like sertraline have shown benefits. However, long-term outcome is not known. CONCLUSION: PPPD is a relatively new entity in the ever-expanding field of neurotology that requires a multimodality approach for effective management. The otologists and general physicians must identify the condition so that favorable outcome can be achieved. The long-term effects of treatment with CBT and VRT are not known. It is important to formulate standard guidelines for treatment. Further research is necessary to identify the role of endogenous biomarkers in the outcome of treatment.


Subject(s)
Dizziness , Vertigo , Humans , Dizziness/diagnosis , Dizziness/etiology , Dizziness/therapy , Vertigo/diagnosis , Brain , Anxiety , Anxiety Disorders
10.
Noise Health ; 24(115): 231-236, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36537447

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Noise is a preventable occupational hazard for certain professions like automobile drivers and traffic police personnel. The harmful auditory effects of noise are well known. However, little is known about the status of the vestibular function in chronic noise exposure without noise induced hearing loss. Our objective was to assess the vestibular function in chronic noise exposure. Methodology: : The study was conducted with a sample size of 242 (chronic noise exposure group - 121, group without chronic noise exposure - 121). Noise estimation was carried out across various traffic intersections to assess the noise exposure levels of the exposed group. All participants underwent a detailed vestibular evaluation in the clinical vestibulometry laboratory. Results: There was no difference in nystagmus, saccades, caloric function between the two groups. The latency and amplitude of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) were similar in both the groups. However, dynamic posturography showed a significant difference in the Adaptation test between the two groups (P < 0.05). We also found a statistically significant difference between the static and dynamic subjective visual vertical (SVV) and the dynamic visual acuity (DVA) between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We did not find any clinical evidence of vestibular dysfunction in the noise exposed group. However, the statistical significance of SVV and DVA as seen in this study needs to be evaluated further as an early marker for vestibular dysfunction. It remains to be seen whether the statistically significant prolongation is reversible after the noise exposure is withdrawn.


Subject(s)
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials , Vestibule, Labyrinth , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Police , Automobiles , Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials/physiology , Vestibular Function Tests
11.
Am J Med Sci ; 364(6): e92-e93, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35917949
12.
Cureus ; 14(5): e25532, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35800830

ABSTRACT

Background Exposure to recreational noise is an emerging public health problem leading to hearing loss. Young people often spend their leisure and relaxation time listening to unsafe levels of music on their personal audio systems. This study aimed to study hearing impairment among young adults due to exposure to various audio gadgets. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted among 241 patients and healthcare workers aged 20-40 years. The data collection instrument was a questionnaire including the history and patterns of usage of headphones. A mobile application-based hearing test, a validated Smartphone hearing screening technology, by the World Health Organization (hearWHO) was used to check hearing. Results Of the 241 adult participants (aged 20 to 40 years), 188 (78%) were males and 53 (22%) were females. The mean hearWHO score was 46.02 ± 9.854, ranging from 21 to 85. The mean hearWHO score for headphone usage with a music system of 50.45 ± 12.32 (p = 0.023) and television of 44.13 ± 8.595 (p = 0.015) was statistically significant. The mean hearWHO score for daily headphone users was 45.93 ± 9.67, for users using daily for more than two hours was 46.59 ± 10.34, for those using headphones for leisure was 47.51 ± 7.74, and for usage music/gaming was 48.71 ± 12.57. Subclinical hearing loss was seen in 201 (83.4%) headphone users. A higher proportion of subclinical hearing loss (74.1%) was noted among participants who used headphones for multiple reasons such as leisure, education, service, music, and gaming. Conclusions In this study, a high proportion of headphone users were found to have subclinical hearing loss. This study generated imperative facts for people and emphasize that they look after their hearing. This study introduces the applicability of new technology in an Indian setting where hearing healthcare is facing challenges.

14.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res ; 12(2): 279-283, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35340816

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of present study was to investigate oral manifestations associated with COVID-19 disease. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study comprised 367 suspects with mild/moderate COVID-19 symptoms who reported to a tertiary care hospital's screening OPD. An in-depth case history was taken, and an oral cavity examination was performed to detect any oral findings. All participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using a naso-pharyngeal swab and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.Oral manifestations and the results of RT-PCR testing were correlated. Statistical analyses were performed using Epi Info and R software. To estimate the prevalence of oral symptoms, the Pearson chi-square test was used. Results: Oral manifestations were found in 58% of the study population. The difference in the prevalence of oral manifestations between RT-PCR positive COVID-19 patients versus RT-PCR negative suspects was statistically significant (p = 0.007) with xerostomia and dysgeusia being significantly higher in positive patients (p = 0.036 and p = 0.044 respectively) while the prevalence of stomatopyrosis and other intraoral signs was insignificant. Conclusion: Xerostomia and dysgeusia are the common oral manifestations of COVID-19.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...