Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr Health Care ; 38(3): 432-437, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180406

ABSTRACT

Nocturnal crying in toddlers has a broad spectrum of causes, including psychosocial and somatic causes, whereby the majority are self-limiting and do not need referral to specialist medical care. Although uncommon, atypical presentations of nocturnal crying-such as spondylodiscitis-require referral to specialist medical care, especially when combined with discomfort. In this case report, we present a case of a 15-month-old girl with an atypical presentation of nocturnal crying in combination with back pain.


Subject(s)
Crying , Discitis , Humans , Female , Discitis/diagnosis , Discitis/complications , Discitis/drug therapy , Infant , Back Pain/etiology , Back Pain/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Treatment Outcome , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1435: 33-56, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38175470

ABSTRACT

Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) can be challenging. First of all, there has been debate on which of the two reference assays, cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) or toxigenic culture (TC), should be considered the gold standard for CDI detection. Although the CCNA suffers most from suboptimal storage conditions and subsequent toxin degradation, TC is reported to falsely increase CDI detection rates as it cannot differentiate CDI patients from patients asymptomatically colonised by toxigenic C. difficile. Several rapid assays are available for CDI detection and fall into three broad categories: (1) enzyme immunoassays for glutamate dehydrogenase, (2) enzyme immunoassays or single-molecule array assays for toxins A/B and (3) nucleic acid amplification tests detecting toxin genes. All three categories have their own limitations, being suboptimal specificity and/or sensitivity or the inability to discern colonised patients from CDI patients. In light of these limitations, multi-step algorithmic testing has been advocated by international guidelines (IDSA/SHEA and ESCMID) in order to optimize diagnostic accuracy. As a result, a survey performed in 2018-2019 in Europe revealed that most of all hospital sites reported using more than one test to diagnose CDI. CDI incidence rates are also influenced by sample selection criteria, as several studies have shown that if not all unformed stool samples are tested for CDI, many cases may be missed due to an absence of clinical suspicion. Since methods for diagnosing CDI remain imperfect, there has been a growing interest in alternative testing strategies like faecal microbiota biomarkers, immune modulating interleukins, cytokines and imaging methods. At the moment, these alternative methods might play an adjunctive role, but they are not suitable to replace conventional CDI testing strategies.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Humans , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Affect , Biological Assay , Cytokines , Europe
3.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 19: 100424, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35782989

ABSTRACT

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, several factors, such as improved hand hygiene, social distancing, and restricted hospital referral, may have had an influence on the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). Methods: The annual CDI incidence rate of nine hospitals participating in the Dutch sentinel CI surveillance with complete data was compared between 2020 and the previous five surveillance years. Trends in characteristics of hospitalised CDI patients in 21-24 participating hospitals were compared between the first (March 13-May 12, 2020) or second Dutch COVID-19 wave (September 17, 2020-January 1, 2021) and the same calendar periods in 2015 through 2019. All analyses were adjusted for trend changes over time. Findings: The annual CDI incidence rate in 2020 was lower compared to previous years. During the second wave, the percentage of CDI patients with severe CDI was higher compared to earlier (25·8% in 2020 vs 17·9% in 2015-2019 (RR 1·6; 95%CI 1·1-2·3)). After adjustment for delayed C. difficile diagnostics (≥8 days from start symptoms), the increase disappeared. Delayed C. difficile diagnostics was indeed more common during the second wave (RR 1·7; 95%CI 1·1-2·6), but only for community-onset CDI (CO-CDI). Interpretation: This study shows that a higher percentage of severe CDI cases was observed during the second COVID-19 wave. This may partially be caused by delayed diagnostics, potentially due to decreased visits to a physician or restricted hospital referral for CO-CDI patients. Funding: Dutch ministry of Health.

4.
Anaerobe ; 65: 102252, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32781108

ABSTRACT

Clostridioides difficile is one of the most important healthcare-associated pathogens. Recently, several new 027-like types have been found that all belong to the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) Clade 2. We report a rapidly spreading outbreak of C. difficile infections (CDI) due to a newly identified PCR ribotype (RT) 181 in a Rehabilitation Centre (RC). Genomic analysis revealed the outbreak strain, not previously identified in Greece, belonged to clade 2, sequence type (ST) 1 and had a 18bp deletion in tcdC at position 311 together with a single nucleotide deletion at position 117, similarly to RT 027. The presence of a clonal outbreak was confirmed by whole genome sequencing, yet the source of this ribotype remained unclear. The emergence and rapid spread of new C. difficile ribotypes highlights the need for ongoing C. difficile surveillance and better understanding of overall Clade 2 phylogeny.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides/classification , Clostridioides/genetics , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Clostridioides/isolation & purification , Disease Outbreaks , Genome, Bacterial , Genomics/methods , Genotype , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Phylogeny , Rehabilitation Centers , Ribotyping
5.
Front Microbiol ; 9: 1242, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29946308

ABSTRACT

Fecal microbiota transplantation has proven to be an effective treatment for infections with the gram-positive enteropathogen Clostridium difficile. Despite its effectiveness, the exact mechanisms that underlie its success are largely unclear. In this review, we highlight the pleiotropic effectors that are transferred during fecal microbiota transfer and relate this to the C. difficile lifecycle. In doing so, we show that it is likely that multiple factors contribute to the elimination of symptoms of C. difficile infections after fecal microbiota transplantation.

6.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1050: 27-44, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29383662

ABSTRACT

Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) can be challenging. First of all, there has been debate on which of the two reference assays, cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) or toxigenic culture (TC) should be considered the gold standard for CDI detection. Although the CCNA suffers most from suboptimal storage conditions and subsequent toxin degradation, TC is reported to falsely increase CDI detection rates as it cannot differentiate CDI patients from patients asymptomatically colonised by toxigenic C. difficile. Several rapid assays are available for CDI detection and fall into three broad categories: (1) enzyme immunoassays for glutamate dehydrogenase, (2) enzyme immunoassays for toxins A/B and (3) nucleic acid amplification tests detecting toxin genes. All three categories have their own limitations, being suboptimal specificity and/or sensitivity or the inability to discern colonised patients from CDI patients. In light of these limitations, multi-step algorithmic testing has now been advocated by international guidelines in order to optimize diagnostic accuracy. Despite these recommendations, testing methods between hospitals vary widely, which impacts CDI incidence rates. CDI incidence rates are also influenced by sample selection criteria, as several studies have shown that if not all unformed stool samples are tested for CDI, many cases may be missed due to an absence of clinical suspicion. Since methods for diagnosing CDI remain imperfect, there has been a growing interest in alternative testing strategies like faecal biomarkers, immune modulating interleukins, cytokines and imaging methods. At the moment, these alternative methods might play an adjunctive role, but they are not suitable to replace conventional CDI testing strategies.


Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Clostridium Infections/diagnostic imaging , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Endoscopy , Feces/microbiology , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Incidence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...