Deep phenotyping and biomarkers of various dairy fat intakes in an 8-week randomized clinical trial and 2-year swine study.

Health effects of dairy fats (DF) are difficult to evaluate, as DF intakes are hard to assess epidemiologically and DF have heterogeneous compositions that influence biological responses. We set out to find biomarkers of DF intake and assess biological response to a summer DF diet (R2), a winter DF diet (R3), and a R3 supplemented with calcium (R4) compared to a plant-fat-based diet (R1) in a randomized clinical trial (n=173) and a 2-year study in mildly metabolically disturbed downsized pigs (n=32). Conventional clinical measures were completed by LC/MS plasma metabolomics/lipidomics. The measured effects were modeled as biological functions to facilitate interpretation. DF intakes in pigs specifically induced a U-shaped metabolic trajectory, reprogramming metabolism to close to its initial status after a one-year turnaround. Twelve lipid species repeatably predicted DF intakes in both pigs and humans (6.6% errors). More broadly, in pigs, quality of DF modulated the time-related biological response (R2: 30 regulated functions, primarily at 6 months; R3: 26 regulated functions, mostly at 6-12 months; R4: 43 regulated functions, mostly at 18 months). Despite this heterogeneity, 9 functions overlapped under all 3 DF diets in both studies, related to a restricted area of amino acids metabolism, cofactors, nucleotides and xenobiotic pathways and the microbiota. In conclusion, over the long-term, DF reprograms metabolism to close to its initial biological status in metabolically-disrupted pigs. Quality of the DF modulates its metabolic influence, although some effects were common to all DF. A resilient signature of DF consumption found in pigs was validated in humans.

Is platelet function testing at the acute phase under P2Y12 inhibitors helpful in predicting bleeding in real-life patients with acute coronary syndrome? The AVALANCHE study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), current international guidelines recommend newer potent and predictable P2Y12 inhibitors as first-line treatment despite a greater bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel. AIM: To determine if platelet function testing can predict bleeding in real-life patients with ACS treated with newer P2Y12 inhibitors. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all consecutive adults admitted to the Lariboisière University Hospital for ACS, whatever the P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed, who had platelet function testing (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation [VASP] index and aggregation tests) during the initial hospital stay were included. Follow-up was performed to record bleeding events according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients were included, treated with ticagrelor (n=123), prasugrel (n=105) or clopidogrel (n=136); 42.3% after an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 27.1% after a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 30.6% with unstable angina. Mean age was 64±11 years. Median VASP index was significantly lower with the newer P2Y12 inhibitors (14% under ticagrelor, 14% under prasugrel) than with clopidogrel (42%). Despite these differences in the degree of platelet inhibition, the occurrence of bleeding (BARC 2-5) during follow-up was 7.7% overall, and was similar for all P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor 8.9%; prasugrel 6.6%; clopidogrel 7.4%). For each P2Y12 inhibitor, it was impossible to determine a VASP index threshold under which bleeding was significantly greater during follow-up. Similarly, ADP-induced aggregation was more profoundly inhibited by ticagrelor and prasugrel than by clopidogrel, but this did not allow a threshold to be set for increased haemorrhagic risk. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the substantial occurrence of bleeding in patients with ACS during follow-up, neither the VASP index nor platelet aggregation test results measured at the acute phase were helpful in predicting bleeding risk. Whether platelet function testing could be helpful later in the course of treatment remains to be evaluated.

Effect of milk fat on LDL cholesterol and other cardiovascular risk markers in healthy humans: the INNOVALAIT project.

BACKGROUND: Milk has a specific saturated fatty acid profile and its calcium content may change the kinetics of fat absorption. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the effect on LDL Cholesterol and other risk markers of four isolipidic diets differing by their fat food source, vegetable fat, spring milk fat, winter milk fat or winter milk fat supplemented with calcium, in healthy moderately hypercholesterolemic humans. INDIVIDUALS AND METHODS: This double-blind, randomized trial with four parallel arms included 172 healthy adults with plasma LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) from 130 to 220 mg/dL and triglycerides below 300 mg/dL. Individual meal plans ensured a stable energy intake. In the three diets containing milk fat, milk fat provided 38% of energy. Vegetable fat and spring milk fat diets provided the same amount of saturated fatty acids while the winter milk fat diets were slightly richer in saturated fatty acids. Vegetable fat diet and winter milk fat diets provided the same amount of palmitic acid (7.0% EI), while the spring milk fat diet was slightly poorer in this fatty acid (5.1% EI). Cardiovascular risk markers were analyzed after 8 weeks of dietary intervention. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in LDL-C and other markers, except total cholesterol (TC), apo C3 and CRP. TC was significantly higher with spring milk fat than with vegetable fat. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, the chosen vegetable fat did not have a significant beneficial effect on LDL-C compared to dairy fat. However, sub-group analysis showed differences in TC, apo C3 and CRP. These results need confirmation and long-term studies aiming at cardiovascular endpoints are warranted.

A novel experimental thrombotic myocardial infarction and primary angioplasty model in swine.

AIMS: We sought to develop a reproducible animal model for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in adult atherosclerosis-prone pigs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A coil was placed in the right coronary artery or the left anterior descending artery in 26 downsized spontaneously hypercholesterolaemic pigs and left untreated until thrombotic occlusion. Then, we crossed the thrombotic occlusion with a guidewire, followed by predilatation, thrombus visualisation with optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and, finally, deployment of a stent and repeated OCT. After revascularisation, we calculated the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). After a feasibility phase (six animals), acute thrombotic occlusion was achieved in all 20 pigs. Eighteen animals were successfully revascularised and survived until sacrifice. Thrombus formation was confirmed by OCT, measurement of thrombin-antithrombin complexes and pathology examination. Myocardial necrosis was confirmed by troponin T elevation, myocardial staining and pathology examination. Distal thrombotic embolisation and microvascular obstruction were supported by increased IMR and pathology examination. CONCLUSIONS: A porcine model of thrombotic occlusion AMI in miniaturised adult spontaneously atherosclerosis-prone pigs is feasible by percutaneous intracoronary placement of a coil. The reperfusion by angioplasty completed this model which mirrors human pathological conditions with myocardial infarction, necrosis and distal embolisation.

Bivalirudin infusion to reduce ventricular infarction: the open-label, randomised Bivalirudin Infusion for Ventricular InfArction Limitation (BIVAL) study.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate whether bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) reduces infarct size (IS) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in large acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre open-label trial randomised 78 patients undergoing PPCI for large AMI to bivalirudin or UFH. The primary endpoint was IS, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) five days after PPCI. Secondary endpoints included index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), CMR-assessed microvascular obstruction (MVO) and ejection fraction, and biomarkers for thrombin activity and cell injury. No difference was observed in mean IS at five days (25.0±19.7 g for bivalirudin vs. 27.1±20.7 g for UFH; p=0.75). Early MVO was numerically lower with bivalirudin (5.3±5.8 g vs. 7.7±6.3 g; p=0.17), with no significant difference in ejection fraction at 90 days (54.6±12.0% vs. 49.1±12.1%; p=0.11). In the biomarkers, thrombin-antithrombin complexes were reduced by 4.8 ug/L over the first day for bivalirudin versus an increase of 1.9 ug/L in the heparin arm (p=0.0003). Acute IMR was lower (43.5±21.6 vs. 68.7±35.8 mmHg×s, respectively; p=0.014). In a planned interim analysis, an approximate 11% reduction in IS was observed with bivalirudin; the trial was discontinued for futility. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not achieve its primary endpoint of significant infarct size reduction in PPCI by prolonged bivalirudin infusion compared to UFH, even though complete thrombin inhibition was achieved in the acute phase, with a lower myocardial microcirculation resistance at the end of the procedure.

Measuring non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant levels: When is it appropriate and which methods should be used?

BACKGROUND: Although the need for an emergency intervention may merit laboratory measurement of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) concentration or anticoagulant activity, NOACs are not supposed to require routine monitoring due to their stable pharmacological profiles compared with warfarin. AIMS: To examine situations where NOAC measurement may be useful and to provide information about methodologies available to measure NOAC-related anticoagulation activity. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: The routine coagulation tests, including prothrombin time, thrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and international normalized ratio, have variable sensitivities to NOACs. Tests have been developed for use with specific NOACs, e.g. diluted thrombin time or chromogenic factor Xa assays. In emergency situations, such as severe bleeding, stroke, or a requirement for urgent surgery or procedures, there may be a need to assess anticoagulant activity to guide clinical decision making. In cases where neutralization of the anticoagulant effect is warranted, specific reversal agents are likely to become invaluable medical tools. Evidence to date suggests that dosing decisions for NOACs based on clinical features (e.g. age or renal function) can help optimize the benefit-risk balance without assessment of anticoagulant activity in non-emergency routine situations. CONCLUSIONS: Regular monitoring of NOAC levels does not provide benefits and cannot be recommended at present. In some specific circumstances, e.g. severe bleeding, before urgent surgery, or before thrombolysis, measurement may be beneficial to assess whether a patient is actively anticoagulated. The availability of NOAC-specific reversal agents may change management practices in emergencies.

Impaired biological response to aspirin in therapeutic hypothermia comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Acute coronary syndrome is one of the main causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). OHCA patients are particularly exposed to high platelet reactivity (HPR) under aspirin (ASA) treatment. The aim was to evaluate HPR-ASA in therapeutic hypothermia comatose patients resuscitated from OHCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-two consecutive patients with OHCA of cardiac origin were prospectively included after therapeutic hypothermia and randomized to receive ASA 100mg per day, either intravenously (n=13) or orally via a gastric tube (n=9). ADP inhibitors (prasugrel or, if contra-indicated, clopidogrel) were administered in the event of angioplasty. HPR-ASA was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) with arachidonic acid (AA) and by the PFA-100(®) system with collagen/epinephrine. Clinical, biological and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Using LTA-AA, maximum aggregation intensity was significantly lower in the intravenous group compared to the oral group (15% vs. 29%, respectively; p=0.04). Overall, 10 patients (45%) had HPR-ASA (38% intravenously vs 56% orally; p=0.7). Similarly, closure time was significantly increased in the IV group (277s vs. 155s, respectively; p=0.04). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that impaired response to both intravenous and oral aspirin is frequent in comatose patients resuscitated from OHCA.

Accuracy of point of care coagulometers compared to reference laboratory measurements in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are widely prescribed throughout the world. Patients on VKA therapy require international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring of venous blood to ensure the response remains within the therapeutic window. Point-of-care devices (POC-INR) can safely and easily monitor VKA efficacy but need to be evaluated in practice. The aim of this study was to assess the precision and accuracy of a new POC-INR (Qlab) compared to the laboratory plasma technique and the CoaguChek-XS system. METHODS: Consecutive patients on VKA referred to our institution were included. The study was designed to analyze 75 patients divided equally in the following subgroups: INR<2; INR=2-3; INR>3. INR was measured with an established laboratory method (INRREF) with an international sensitivity index of 1.0 and by two different POC-INRs: the Qlab (INRQlab) and the CoaguChek-XS systems (INRXS). RESULTS: 82 patients treated mainly for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism disease were included. Precision in therapeutic range (INR=2-3) of both POC-INRs was satisfactory with a coefficient of variation of 4.6% for the Qlab and 4.3% for the CoaguChek-XS. INRRef was 2.70 ± 1.36, INRQlab 2.59 ± 1.25 and INRXS 2.89 ± 1.37. Accuracy was low with the Qlab (R(2)=0.64) and higher with the CoaguChek-XS (R(2)=0.94). The mean relative difference from the INRRef was higher for the Qlab (18.4%) than for the CoaguChek-XS (12.9%). Clinical concordance was lower with the Qlab (78.2%) than with the CoaguChek-XS (90.0%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the Qlab has accuracy limitations with clinical consequences. New POC-INR devices require careful evaluation prior to clinical implementation.

Enoxaparin chains stored during chronic treatment are mobilized by a bolus of unfractionated heparin: insights from the STACKENOX study.

The initial STACKENOX (STACK-on to ENOXaparin) study investigated the effect of stacking unfractionated heparin (UFH) onto a chronic treatment with enoxaparin, a common practice in interventional cardiology when a patient treated with enoxaparin receives an additional bolus of UFH at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention. The study brought to light some unexpected consequences on coagulation tests and hemorrhagic risk. This substudy was performed to provide a pharmacological explanation for these observations. Seventy-two healthy individuals previously treated with enoxaparin for 2.5 days received a stack-on of 70 IU/kg intravenous UFH dose 4, 6, or 10 h after the last enoxaparin dose. Anticoagulation activity was monitored by activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities and a thrombin generation test. In parallel, plasma samples of the individuals receiving the chronic enoxaparin treatment obtained at 4, 6, or 10 h after the last enoxaparin dose were spiked in vitro with a dose of UFH reproducing the concentration achieved in vivo after the bolus of UFH alone. In-vivo stack-on of UFH induced an over-anticoagulation identified by changes in anti-Xa and, less markedly, in anti-IIa and activated partial thromboplastin time levels, whereas in-vitro UFH spiking, only produced an additive effect. We hypothesize that the potentiation of UFH on anti-Xa activity observed in vivo may caused by the UFH bolus mobilizing enoxaparin chains stored in the endothelial glycocalyx during chronic pretreatment. This over-anticoagulation and its potential hemorrhagic risk after stack-on of UFH have obvious clinical implications.

Predictors of high on-aspirin platelet reactivity in high-risk vascular patients treated with single or dual antiplatelet therapy.

Aspirin is the key treatment in the secondary prevention of atherothrombosis. Interindividual variability of response has been linked to a higher risk for ischemic events. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and biologic factors predicting high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HPR) in a high-risk, "real-world" population of vascular patients. All platelet testing performed from 2011 to 2013 in consecutive patients receiving long-term treatment with aspirin for coronary or cerebrovascular disease was retrospectively analyzed. Indications for platelet testing were recurrent ischemic events or high-risk angioplasty. HPR was defined as aggregation intensity≥20% using light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid 0.5 mg/ml. Collagen-epinephrine platelet function analysis was also performed (threshold<165 seconds). Cardiovascular risk factors, usual biologic parameters, and antiplatelet treatment were recorded. A total of 1,508 patients were included (mean age 63 years, 71% men, 23% with diabetes). Antiplatelet treatment was aspirin alone in 333 patients and dual-antiplatelet therapy in 1,175 patients. HPR was found in 11.1% of patients. In multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors of HPR on light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid were diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39 to 3.16), age (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.47), fibrinogen level (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.42), and von Willebrand factor level (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.09). On light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid and collagen-epinephrine platelet function analysis, fibrinogen remained the main factor associated with HPR (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.61). Similar results were found in patients treated with aspirin alone or dual-antiplatelet therapy. A fibrinogen level>4.0 g/L was associated with a 3.9-fold increased risk for HPR in patients aged <75 years. In conclusion, fibrinogen level was the major predictor of HPR on aspirin in this large population of high-risk vascular patients.

Absorption and efficacy of acetylsalicylic acid in patients with short bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The patients with a short bowel (SB) frequently require antiplatelet therapy. Resection of the bowel is likely to modify the absorption and first-pass effect of drugs. No data on the absorption and efficacy of the cardiovascular dose of aspirin (75-160 mg) in these patients have been published. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a low dose of aspirin in patients with SB caused by mesenteric ischemia. METHODS: The efficacy of a low dose of aspirin was assessed in 10 consecutive SB patients, both 1 hour and 24 hours after administration (peak and trough value, respectively). The primary criterion was the inhibition of platelet aggregation, as assessed by light transmission aggregometry, triggered with 0.5 mg/mL arachidonic acid. Biological efficacy of aspirin was also evaluated by serum thromboxane B2 value and by platelet function analyzer-100. RESULTS: At its peak value, aspirin had the expected efficacy, as demonstrated both by light transmission aggregometry and the other methods. However, 24 hours after administration, as many as 30% of patients had lost the pharmacological efficacy of their aspirin. CONCLUSION: We show for the first time that with at least 30 cm of small intestine, all patients with SB absorb sufficient oral aspirin in a cardiovascular dose to rapidly exert the expected level of antiplatelet activity. But given only once daily, aspirin does not provide stable 24-hour antiplatelet protection in 30% of patients, because of increased platelet turnover, as usually observed in patients with extensive vascular pathology, diabetes, or inflammation.

Monitoring persistent platelet reactivity in patients with unprotected left main stenting.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the rate and potential clinical impact of persistent platelet reactivity (PPR) in unprotected left main (ULMD) stenting. BACKGROUND: PPR under aspirin or thienopyridines is associated with acute events after angioplasty. METHODS: We prospectively included 125 patients referred for ULMD stenting. For the first 64 patients (ALMA-1), angioplasty was performed under aspirin and clopidogrel without platelet reactivity assessment. For the last 61 patients (ALMA-2), platelet reactivity was assessed before angioplasty: in patients with aspirin-related PPR, aspirin twice daily was given and in those with clopidogrel-related PPR, clopidogrel double dose or prasugrel was used. RESULTS: Overall, patients' mean age was 69 ± 13 years, 37% were diabetic, and 37% had non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients' characteristics were similar in both studies with isolated left main in 14% and associated with 1-, 2-, or 3-vessel disease in 23%, 36%, and 27%, respectively. Mean SYNTAX score was 23 ± 9. Procedural characteristics were similar using provisional T stenting in 69%, T stenting in 27%, and other techniques in 4%. In ALMA-2, 28% patients had PPR for aspirin, 29% for clopidogrel, and 8% for both. Aspirin twice daily was given in 28% of patients, clopidogrel double dose in 26%, and prasugrel in 31%. The rate of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was lower in ALMA-2 versus ALMA-1 (8.2% vs. 20.8%; P = 0.04) as a composite end-point of cardiovascular death or stent thrombosis (0.0% vs. 8.3%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: PPR under aspirin and thienopyridines is frequent in ULMD stenting and could be related to subsequent major events.

Biological efficacy of twice daily aspirin in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with a high rate of events after acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention despite aspirin treatment. Once daily aspirin might not provide 24-hour stable biological efficacy in patients with diabetes. We compared the biological efficacy of the same daily dose of aspirin given either once (OPD) or divided twice per day in a population of diabetic patients with previous coronary artery disease. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive diabetic patients with at least 1 criteria of time-dependent aspirin efficacy, elevated high-sensibility C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), fibrinogen, platelet count, or active smoking were prospectively included. Consecutive patients were randomly treated with 150-mg aspirin daily given either OPD (150 mg in the morning) or twice per day (75 mg in the morning and 75 mg in the evening) in a crossover study. The main outcome was platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid (0.5 mg/mL) measured by light transmission aggregometry at trough level before morning aspirin intake. RESULTS: Mean maximum aggregation intensity triggered by arachidonic acid was 19.7% ± 15.4% on OPD and 11.9% ± 10.4% on twice per day (P < .0001). Biological resistance (maximum aggregation intensity ≥20%) was observed in 42% of patients on OPD and 17% on twice per day (P < .001). Of the 39 patients with biological resistance on OPD, 24 (62%) overcame resistance on twice per day. Of the 16 resistant on twice per day, only 1 patient (6%) overcame resistance on OPD. Results were concordant with global evaluation of platelet reactivity by Platelet Function Analyzer-100. A better twice per day efficacy was independent of clopidogrel cotreatment. CONCLUSION: In a population of diabetic patients with coronary artery disease and a high risk of time-dependent aspirin resistance, aspirin divided twice per day can significantly decrease the rate of biological loss of efficacy at trough level.

In vivo effect of proton-pump inhibitors on gastric plasmin-dependent fibrinolysis: a study in a porcine model.

INTRODUCTION: Alkalization of gastric fluids could inhibit plasmin-mediated and/or pepsin-mediated fibrinolysis. We evaluated the gastric antifibrinolytic effect of proton pump inhibitors in a live porcine model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six pigs were randomly assigned to treatment with proton pump inhibitors vs no treatment. After endoscopic mucosal resection, 8 µm sections were incubated on fibrin films. Fibrinolytic activity was assessed through focal lysis time. One-hundred-and-forty-two mucosal sections and 129 submucosal sections were analysed. Twenty-four additional sections were analysed on plates containing tranexamic acid to explore pepsin-mediated fibrinolysis. RESULTS: Focal lysis times in treated vs control groups were 21.0 min vs 21.2 min (p = 0.39) in the mucosa, and 22.2 min vs 20.2 min (p = 0.56) in the submucosa. No lysis could be seen on the plasmin-inhibited fibrin plates. CONCLUSION: Only plasmin-mediated fibrinolysis was observed. Proton pump inhibitors had no significant plasmin-dependant antifibrinolytic effect. They may enhance haemostasis through different pathways.

FXIII-A Leu34 genetic variant in premature coronary artery disease: a genotype--phenotype case control study.

The FXIII-A Leu34 genetic variant increases and accelerates fibrin stabilisation; however, its association with premature coronary artery disease (CAD) and thrombotic events remains controversial. FXIII Val34Leu genotype was determined in 242 young individuals (<45 years old) who survived a myocardial infarction (MI) and 242 healthy controls matched for age and gender. We evaluated its effect on long-term clinical outcome defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI and urgent revascularisation. In addition, fibrin clot stiffness (elastic modulus or EM) and response to rt-PA-mediated fibrinolysis (fibrinolysis rate) were measured ex vivo using the Hemodyne analyser and confocal microscopy as surrogate endpoint. FXIII-A Leu34 genetic variant was not associated with premature CAD (adj. odds ratio 0.83 [0.49-1.4]) nor did it influence clinical outcome in patients, during a median follow-up of 6.3 (± 2.4) years. Patients produced stiffer fibrin clots (median [IQR] EM = 20.3 [14.9-28.1] vs. 12.8 [9.6-17.1] kdynes/cm²; p<0.0001) and displayed reduced response to fibrinolysis with lower fibrinolysis rate (6.7 [3.4-11.0] vs. 9.0 [5.0-16.7] sec-¹ x 10(-4); p<0.0001) than healthy controls. Carriage of factor XIII-A Leu34 led to a stepwise decrease in fibrinolysis rate with a significant gene-dose-effect in patients (7.7 [4.1-12.2] vs. 4.8 [3.0-8.5] vs. 4.3 [2.4-8.1] sec-¹ x 10(-4), for wild-type, heterozygous and homozygous, p for trend = 0.003) and a non-significant trend in controls (p = 0.01). In conclusion, FXIII-A Leu34 is a polymorphism which provides a strong resistance to fibrinolysis with a gene-dose effect, but does not relate to premature CAD or to recurrent coronary events in this study.