Potential of an mRNA-Based Urine Assay (Xpert® Bladder Cancer Detection1) in Hematuria Patients - Results from a Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Assessment of patients with hematuria (aH) remains a challenge in urological practice, balancing the benefits of diagnosing a potentially underlying bladder cancer (UCa) against the risks of possibly unnecessary diagnostic interventions. This study analyzes the potential of an mRNA-based urine assay, the Xpert® Bladder Cancer Detection- CE-IVD (Xpert BC-D), in patients with hematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 368 patients with newly observed painless hematuria and no history of UCa were included in this observational study. Patients received urological workup, including urethrocystoscopy (WLC), upper tract imaging, urine cytology and Xpert BC-D. Patients with positive WLC were recommended to undergo tumor resection (TUR-B). RESULTS: After excluding non-assessable cases, 324 patients were considered for analysis (188 males, 136 females; median age: 61 years). Eight of twenty-eight patients with a positive TUR-B had Ta low grade (LG) tumors; the others were diagnosed with high grade (HG) lesions (Ta: 4, CIS: 2, T1:11, > T1:3). The Xpert BC-D was more sensitive than urine cytology (96% vs. 61%) (p = 0.002). Increased risk ratios (RR) were observed for gross hematuria, gender, urine cytology, and positive Xpert BC-D (all p < 0.05). Age and positive Xpert BC-D remained independent predictors of UCa in multivariate analysis. Simulating a triage with WLC restricted to patients with positive Xpert BC-D could have saved 240 (74.1%) assessments at the cost of missing one pTa LG tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest a potential role for Xpert BC-D in preselecting patients with hematuria for either further invasive diagnosis or an alternate diagnostic procedure.

A Comparison Between Sequential Conventional and Hypofractionated Boost Following Whole-Breast Radiotherapy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The majority of local relapses after breast conservation therapy occur in the proximity of the primary lesion. Studies have shown that boost radiotherapy (RT) following conventional whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) of 50 Gy in five weeks improves outcomes. Boost RT also increases the risk of moderate skin reactions and fibrosis. The ideal boost RT dose and timing (sequential versus simultaneous) after hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules remain unclear. This retrospective propensity score-matched analysis assessed the outcome of sequential hypofractionated boost compared to conventional fractionated boost. METHODS: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India. Patients with stage I-III breast cancer who have received adjuvant radiotherapy with a sequential boost of either hypofractionated RT (8 Gy in three fractions) or conventional fractionated RT (10 Gy in five fractions) after conservative breast surgery were identified from the radiotherapy planning records and included in this study. A 1:1 case matching was performed using a propensity score incorporating four known prognostic factors, namely, clinical and pathological composite stage, tumor grade, tumor biology (based on estrogen and/or progesterone and HER2 neu expression), and boost technique, which may have an impact on acute toxicity to make the two boost groups more homogenous. RESULTS: After propensity score matching (PSM), there were a total of 166 patients, with 83 patients each in both conventional and hypofractionated boost RT groups. The median follow-up period was 30.7 months. At two years, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 98.8% in both groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) at two years for the hypofractionated group and conventional group was 91.5% and 96.3% (hazard ratio (HR): 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.664-9.4, p = 0.161), respectively, with no statistically significant difference. Patients with grade 3 tumors who received hypofractionated boost had a statistically significant increased risk of recurrence (DFS: 88.9% versus 100%, HR: 60.559, 95% CI: 0.138-26613.2, p = 0.011). The overall survival (OS) at two years was 100% in both groups. There was no difference in acute skin toxicity between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present interim analysis shows similar locoregional recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and disease-free survival and acute skin toxicity for hypofractionated boost RT of 8 Gy in three fractions compared to the conventional boost of 10 Gy in five fractions. Hypofractionated boost is a feasible alternative option following hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy for women with breast conservation treatment. However, longer follow-up is required before forming definite conclusions.

Laryngeal impaction of an archwire segment after accidental ingestion during orthodontic adjustment.

Orthodontic archwires or fractured appliances that are accidentally swallowed can become lodged in the airway or gastrointestinal tract. Inadvertent ingestion or aspiration of an appliance or archwire piece during orthodontic appliance adjustment is a medical emergency with potentially serious complications, including possible death from asphyxiation. This article reports the accidental ingestion of a piece of orthodontic archwire that became impacted in the larynx; it was subsequently retrieved. Some potential complications are discussed, along with suggested precautions to prevent such mishaps when using fixed appliances.

Prevention and management of accidental foreign body ingestion and aspiration in orthodontic practice.

Among the myriad emergencies that could arise in the dental clinical setting there are a few that occur occasionally despite being entirely preventable. Ingestion or aspiration of dental materials, appliances, or instruments comprises this category. Regardless of incidence, foreign body ingestion or aspiration episodes are recognized as potential complications in the specialty of orthodontics. Despite their infrequent occurrence, the morbidity from a single incident and the amount of specialty medical care that may be needed to manage such incidents is too high to ignore. There is also the associated risk of malpractice litigation given the fact that these incidents are preventable. At present, no clear guidelines exist regarding prevention of this emergency in practice. This article attempts to review relevant literature and aims to formulate certain recommendations based on best available evidence to minimize the incidence of such events, while also suggesting guidelines toward making their management more effective. A flow chart outlining management options and strategies to aid the clinician in the event of such an emergency is also presented.