Are We Missing Something in the CT-PNS Report? - an Observational Study on the Rate of Reporting the Presence of Dental Disease and the Probable Etiology of Sinusitis on CT Scans.

Objectives: To (i) identify the prevalence of dental disease, (ii) identify the proportion of sinusitis cases that could be considered odontogenic in origin and, (iii) audit the rate of diagnosis of incidental dental disease and odontogenic sinusitis in radiology reports on CT scans covering the maxillary teeth and sinuses. Materials and methods: Images and reports of CT studies performed in our institution that covered the paranasal sinuses and maxilla were retrospectively audited for documentation of findings pertaining to maxillary sinusitis and maxillary dental disease. Trauma cases, edentulous and pediatric patients and patients without maxillary sinusitis or dental disease were excluded. The etiologies of maxillary sinusitis was defined as likely odontogenic, indeterminate and rhinogenic sinusitis. Only molar and pre-molar tooth disease were considered as these are most commonly in direct contact with the floor of the maxillary sinus. Results: One-hundred sixty CT studies were reviewed. The prevalence of dental caries and periapical lucency was 80.6% and 15.0%, respectively. The cause of sinusitis was determined to be likely odontogenic in 30.0%, rhinogenic in 33.1% and of indeterminate origin in 36.9%. The rate of reporting dental findings or raising the suspicion of odontogenic sinusitis was 8.5% (n = 14). Conclusions: Under-reporting of dental disease and odontogenic sinusitis is common. Early recognition results in higher chances of salvaging the diseased tooth, preventing complications and providing appropriate treatment. An urgent and collective effort by the radiological fraternity is warranted to recognize the significance of reporting of dental pathologies, even in CT scans done for other indications.

Wired for Surgical Success: Our Experience with Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Wire Localization of Impalpable Breast Lesions.

Aims The purpose of this study was to review our experience with preoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization and to identify our rate of successful localization and subsequent excision. Materials and Methods At our institution, we performed preoperative wire localization for 28 impalpable breast lesions in 27 women (1 patient underwent wire localization for bilateral breast lesions), between April 2016 and August 2019. We used a Toshiba APLIO2 ultrasound machine and a linear probe (7-12 MHz) to visualize lesions and needle-wire systems comprising a 20-gauge needle with preloaded wire to localize lesions. We analyzed the percentage of specimen mammograms with wire in situ and percentage of excised specimens showing margins free of tumor, along with imaging features, BI-RADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System) categories, and histopathological and molecular diagnosis of the lesions. Results All specimen mammograms confirmed the presence of wire in situ, except one (96.4%); in the latter case, postponement of surgery due to intractable cough was suspected to have caused wire displacement. All malignant specimens showed margins free of tumor (100%). Conclusions Our results show that wire localization is extremely effective in providing crucial preoperative insight into the precise location of an impalpable lesion. Despite the advent of nonwire localization devices such as radioactive seeds, radar reflectors, magnetic seed markers, and radiofrequency identification tags, wire localization remains the most widely practiced method, especially in resource-limited settings. Its high degree of accuracy serves as a key factor in the successful outcome of breast conservation surgery for impalpable breast lesions.