ABSTRACT
As an alternative to regenerative therapies, numerous authors have recently proposed bringing back subperiosteal implants. The aim of the study was to present our clinical experience with a subperiosteal jaw implant that needs minimal bone preparation and enables the rapid implantation of prosthetic teeth in edentulous, atrophic alveolar bone. The research included 36 complete or partial edentulous patients (61 subperiostal implants) over a period of 6 years. To create the patient-specific subperiostal implants design, DentalCAD 3.0 Galway software (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) was used and fabricated with a Mysint 100 (Sisma S.p.A., Piovene Rocchette, Italy) by titanium alloy powder. The results showed that only 9 of the 36 cases were successful at 6-year follow-up, while 27 cases had complications, including exposure of the metal frame (early or delayed), mobility of the device prior to the first 4-6 months, and late mobility due to recurrent infections and progressive structure exposure; 1 case failed for reasons unrelated to the device. This study indicated that the prudent application of fully customized subperiosteal jaw implants is a dependable alternative for the dental rehabilitation of atrophic edentulous cases that necessitate bone grafts for traditional fixed dental implant solutions.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this case report was to present the aesthetic result of the reconstruction of facial residual asymmetry after orthognathic surgery using a patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) mold and a custom-made polymethyl methacrylate implant. Through computer-aided design (CAD), the healthy contralateral side of the mandible was superimposed onto the side with the defect. Exocad Gallway (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to design the patient-specific implants (PSIs) of the right mandibular angle. Next, the implant mold was created using the Meshmixer software (Version 3.5, Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA, USA) and fabricated using additive manufacturing. During the surgical procedure, the patient-specific implant (PSI) was cast inside the resin mold using Simplex P bone cement (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA). The implant was fixed using three screws. Combining both indirect (involving the dental laboratory) and direct (with surgical intervention) approaches, this innovative hybrid method, which incorporates both computer-aided design and additive manufacturing (AM), not only enhanced facial aesthetics, functional rehabilitation, and patient quality of life but also mitigated the potential risks linked to conventional grafting methods.
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to report a clinical case of dental implant failure with significant bone loss that was treated using reconstructive surgical techniques. We present a 58-year-old man with a history of implant surgery and implant failure on the mandible. Data collected using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans were exported into Exoplan (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), from which a standard tessellation file was obtained. To create a customized mandible mesh design, DentalCAD 3.0 Galway software (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) was used. Based on guided bone regeneration, the method involved bone reconstruction and the application of a custom titanium mesh. The bone mix was obtained by combining a xenograft (Cerabone, Bottis biomaterials Gmbh, Zossen, Germany), an allograft (Max Graft, granules Bottis biomaterials Gmbh, Zossen, Germany), and an autograft. The titanium meshes were fixed to the bone using self-drilling screws and covered with a resorbable membrane. Immediately after surgery, an impression was recorded, and the next day, the patient received a milled polymethyl methacrylate interim denture. Based on our case study, the presented custom-made implant can be considered a temporary solution, during which guided bone regeneration is expected to take place.
ABSTRACT
For facial abnormalities, recent developments in virtual surgical planning (VSP) and the virtual design of surgical splints are accessible. Software companies have worked closely with surgical teams for accurate outcomes, but they are only as reliable as the data provided to them. The current case's aim was to show a fully digitized workflow using a combination of three digital software to correct predicted post-upward sliding genioplasty defects. To reach our goal, we presented a 28-year-old man with long-face syndrome for orthodontic treatment. Before orthognathic surgery, a clinical and paraclinical examination was performed. For a virtual surgical plan, we used the dedicated surgical planning software NemoFab (Nemotec, Madrid, Spain) and Autodesk MeshMixer (Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA, USA). To create the design of the digital guides, DentalCAD 3.0 Galway (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and Autodesk MeshMixer (Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA, USA) were used. The patient had undergone bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in addition to Le Fort 1 osteotomy and genioplasty, followed by mandible base recontouring ostectomy. Stable fixation was used for each osteotomy. Based on our case, the current orthognathic surgery planning software was not able to perform all the necessary operations autonomously; therefore, future updates are eagerly awaited.
