ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pneumonia among nursing home (NH) residents has increased considerably in recent years, but it remains unclear whether it should be considered as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or a new category of infection. METHODS: 150 consecutive cases of NH-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) (from 1 February 1997 to 1 July 2007) were analysed. RESULTS: Patients (median age, 82 years; range, 77-87 years) showed numerous co-morbidities, (neurological, 55%; pulmonary, 38%; cardiac, 35%) and severe disability for daily activities (partial, 32%; total, 31%). Cases of NHAP were mainly classified as mild to moderate according to the CRB-65 score (CRB-65 classes 0-1 and 2, 41% each). In-hospital and 30-day mortality were 8.7% and 20%, respectively. Aetiology was defined in 57 cases (38%). The most common isolates were Streptococcus pneumoniae (58%), Enterobacteriaceae (Gram-negative bacteria (GNB)) (9%), atypical bacteria (7%), respiratory viruses (5%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (5%) and Legionella pneumophila (5%). The most frequent causes of treatment inadequacy were use of beta-lactams alone (25%) and lack of aspiration assessment (15%). Prognostic factors of 1-month mortality were neurological comorbidities (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.3 to 15.7; p=0.020), septic shock (OR 6.6; 95% CI 1.3 to 34.0; p=0.025), pleural effusion (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.1 to 11.7; p=0.036) and isolation of GNB or MRSA (OR 16.4; 95% CI 2.1 to 128.9; p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The patients show clinical characteristics (eg, age and co-morbidities) comparable with those with hospital-acquired pneumonia. However, microbiological and mortality data of patients with NHAP are more similar to the data of those with CAP. Isolation of GNB or MRSA was associated with increased mortality risk. CAP empirical antibiotic coverage is still indicated in NHAP, although specific risk factors for multidrug-resistant infections should be assessed on an individual basis.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/microbiology , Homes for the Aged , Nursing Homes , Pneumonia/microbiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/transmission , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/transmission , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/transmission , Prognosis , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
Time-to-positivity is useful in the diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia and as a predictor of an endovascular source in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. However, this parameter has been evaluated for only a limited number of microorganisms. In the present study, time-to-positivity was recorded for 1872 episodes of significant monomicrobial bacteraemia diagnosed at a teaching hospital during a 2-year period, and the associated microbial and clinical variables were investigated. According to multivariate analysis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, beta-haemolytic streptococci, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter and Aeromonas were characterised by fast growth, with an endovascular source, shock, liver cirrhosis and neutropenia also predicting a short time-to-positivity. For patients not receiving appropriate antibiotics, detection of Gram-positive cocci in clusters within 14 h was predictive of Staph. aureus; a time-to-positivity of >21 h ruled out the possibility that a Gram-positive organism in chains was a beta-haemolytic streptococcus or Strep. pneumoniae, and a time-to-positivity of < or =12 h meant that it was very unlikely that a Gram-negative bacillus was a non-fermenter. A time-to-positivity of < or =8 h was predictive of a non-urinary tract source in patients with E. coli bacteraemia, and detection of growth within 13 h predicted an endovascular source in those with Staph. aureus bacteraemia. In conclusion, time-to-positivity depended on the microorganism, original source and clinical variables involved. Although this measurement may provide some early clues concerning the microorganisms involved and the source of bacteraemia, its clinical impact remains to be defined.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Cocci/isolation & purification , Bacteriological Techniques , Blood/microbiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Culture Media , Gram-Negative Bacteria/growth & development , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Positive Cocci/growth & development , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time FactorsABSTRACT
In order to gather more data on the use of teicoplanin for reducing MRSA infections in high-risk populations, the present study was conducted. At a hospital in Barcelona, Spain, there was a high prevalence of MRSA infections among patients who underwent surgery for femoral neck fracture during the first 5 months of 2002 (period A) when cefuroxime was the antibiotic prophylaxis. During the following 12 months (period B) 600 mg of teicoplanin was added to cefuroxime. The rates of overall and MRSA infection during period A were 5.07 and 2.73%, respectively. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis demonstrated there was no clonal relationship among MRSA strains. No nasal carriers of MRSA were detected among health workers. During period B the rates of overall and MRSA infection were 2.36 and 0.19%, respectively. Both rates were statistically significantly lower than those in period A (p<0.05). These results suggest teicoplanin may be useful in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery when the prevalence of MRSA is high.
