Comparative effectiveness of tildrakizumab 200 mg versus tildrakizumab 100 mg in psoriatic patients with high disease burden or above 90 kg of body weight: a 16-week multicenter retrospective study - IL PSO (Italian landscape psoriasis).

PURPOSE: Tildrakizumab is a selective inhibitor of IL-23 approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in two dosages. We conducted a 16-week multicenter retrospective study to compare the effectiveness and safety of tildrakizumab 200 mg versus tildrakizumab 100 mg in patients with a high disease burden or high body weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our retrospective study included 134 patients treated with tildrakizumab 200 mg and 364 patients treated with tildrakizumab 100 mg from 28 Italian Dermatology Units affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The patients had a body weight above 90 kg or a high disease burden (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≥ 16 or the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas). We evaluated the effectiveness of tildrakizumab at the week-16 visit in terms of PASI90, PASI100 and absolute PASI ≤ 2. RESULTS: After 16 weeks of treatment with tildrakizumab 200 mg, PASI90 was reached by 57.5% of patients and PASI100 by 39.6% of patients. At the same time point, 34.3% and 24.2% of patients treated with tildrakizumab 100 mg achieved PASI90 and PASI100, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that tildrakizumab 200 mg has better effectiveness than tildrakizumab 100 mg in patients with a body weight ≥ 90 kg and a high disease burden.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriasis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Ustekinumab: A 3-Year Multicenter Study.

Background: Guselkumab is the first approved human IgG1λ monoclonal antibody selectively targeting the p19 subunit of IL23. Its effectiveness and safety were widely reported by clinical trials. However, these results must be confirmed in real life since its safety deals with more complicated subjects with respect to trials. Currently, real-life data on the use of guselkumab following treatment failure with ustekinumab are limited, and existing studies usually show a small cohort and/or a reduced follow-up period. In this context, the aim of our study was to evaluate the use of guselkumab in patients who previously did not respond to ustekinumab after up to 3 years of treatment. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was performed. The study enrolled patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis undergoing treatment with guselkumab who were attending the Psoriasis Center of nine different centers in the Campania region of Italy. Demographic and clinical features were collected for each patient at baseline. Moreover, data on psoriasis severity and adverse events (AEs) were collected at each follow-up visit (week (W)16-W36-W52-W104-W156). Results: A total of 112 patients (70 male, 62.5%; mean age 54.8 ± 11.7 years old) were enrolled. Of these, 48 (42.9%), 34 (30.4%), and 16 (14.3%) reached 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, of follow-up under guselkumab. A statistically significant clinical improvement was observed since W16, and sustained effectiveness was reported at each timepoint up to W156. No serious AEs were collected. Moreover, a sub analysis on the body mass index, involvement of difficult-to-treat areas, and presence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) showed that the presence of PsA or palmoplantar psoriasis was associated with a reduced clinical improvement at W16 and W36, without differences from W52. In contrast, the efficacy of guselkumab does not seem to be affected by the BMI, involvement of fingernails, or location in the genital or scalp area. Conclusions: To sum up, our long-term real-life multicenter retrospective study confirmed the efficacy and safety of guselkumab following ustekinumab discontinuation up to 156 weeks of treatment.

Differential diagnosis of contact dermatitis: A practical-approach review by the EADV Task Force on contact dermatitis.

The diagnosis of eczema ('dermatitis') is mostly clinical and depends on the clinical history and exploratory objective findings (primary lesions, patterns). Contact dermatitis remains as an important condition in the group of eczematous disorders, with important socioeconomic and occupational relevance. Although irritant and allergic contact dermatitis have a different pathogenesis, both are characterized by a rather typical morphology, are triggered by external factors and tend to occur primarily in the area of contact with the exogenous agent. In addition, allergic and irritant dermatitis may also co-exist. The importance of diagnosing contact dermatitis, especially when allergic in nature, is both due to the possibility of avoiding the trigger, and due to its role in aggravating other skin conditions. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of clinical presentations in daily practice may pose an important challenge for the suspicion and correct diagnosis of contact dermatitis. Furthermore, other conditions, with different pathogenesis and treatment, may clinically simulate contact dermatitis. The Task Force aims to conduct a review of the unifying clinical features of contact dermatitis and characterize its main clinical phenotypes, and its simulators, in order to contribute to an early suspicion or recognition of contact dermatitis and enable a correct differential diagnosis.

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Ixekizumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Five-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study-IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis).

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of biological therapies has revolutionized the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. In particular, ixekizumab, an inhibitor of interleukin-17A, has shown great results in terms of efficacy and safety in both clinical trials and real-world experiences. However, there is a lack of long-term real-world data available for ixekizumab. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter real-life study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI) was collected at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. The occurrence of any adverse events was recorded at each time point. RESULTS: We enrolled 1096 patients treated with ixekizumab for at least 1 year. At week 52, the percentages of PASI 90 and PASI 100 were 85.04% and 69.07%, respectively. After 5 years of treatment with ixekizumab, out of 145 patients, a PASI 90 response was achieved by 86.90% of patients, while complete skin clearance was reached by 68.28% of patients. We did not observe any new significant safety findings throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: This study supports the long-term effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in a real-world setting.

Bimekizumab for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis with Involvement of Genitalia: A 16-Week Multicenter Real-World Experience - IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis).

INTRODUCTION: Genital involvement is observed in approximately 60% of patients with psoriasis, presenting clinicians with formidable challenges in treatment. While new biologic drugs have emerged as safe and effective options for managing psoriasis, their efficacy in challenging-to-treat areas remains inadequately explored. Intriguingly, studies have shown that interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors exhibit effectiveness in addressing genital psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the effectiveness profile of bimekizumab in patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with involvement of genitalia. METHODS: Bimekizumab, a dual inhibitor of both IL-17A and IL-17F, was the focus of our 16-week study, demonstrating highly favorable outcomes for patients with genital psoriasis. The effectiveness of bimekizumab was evaluated in terms of improvement in Static Physician Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index. RESULTS: Sixty-five adult patients were enrolled. Remarkably, 98.4% of our participants achieved a clear sPGA-G score (s-PGA-g = 0) within 16 weeks. Moreover, consistent improvements were observed in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores, accompanied by a significant reduction in the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index, signifying enhanced quality of life. Notably, none of the patients reported a severe impairment in their quality of life after 16 weeks of treatment. In our cohort of 65 patients, subgroup analyses unveiled that the effectiveness of bimekizumab remained unaffected by prior exposure to other biologics or by obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial findings suggest that bimekizumab may serve as a valuable treatment option for genital psoriasis. Nevertheless, further research with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-up is imperative to conclusively validate these results.

Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Drug Survival of Risankizumab in a Real-World Setting: A Three-Year Retrospective Multicenter Study-IL PSO (ITALIAN LANDSCAPE PSORIASIS).

BACKGROUND: Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin-23. It has been approved for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and has shown efficacy and safety in clinical trials and real-world experiences. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness, safety, and drug survival of risankizumab in a real-life setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients treated with risankizumab from January 2019 to February 2023. A Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI) was collected at weeks 0, 16, 28, 52, 104, and 156, when available. The occurrence of any adverse events was recorded at each visit. RESULTS: We enrolled 1047 patients. At week 52, a ≥90% improvement in PASI was observed in 81.44% of patients, with a continuous improvement throughout the study (88.99% and 99.07% at weeks 104 and 156, respectively). After three years of treatment, all patients involving the scalp, palms/soles, and genitalia and 95% of patients with nail psoriasis achieved a complete or almost complete skin clearance. No significant safety findings were observed, and 90.73% of the patients were still on treatment after 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the long-term effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in a real-world setting, even in patients involving difficult-to-treat areas.

Association between maternal dupilumab exposure and pregnancy outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited epidemiological evidence on outcomes associated with dupilumab exposure during pregnancy; monitoring pregnancy outcomes in large populations is required. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential association between exposure to dupilumab in pregnant women with atopic dermatitis and any adverse pregnancy, neonatal, congenital and post-partum outcomes. METHODS: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study across 19 Italian tertiary referral hospital. Childbearing women were eligible if aged 18-49 years and carried out the pregnancy between 1 October 2018 and 1 September 2022. RESULTS: We retrospectively screened records of 5062 patients receiving dupilumab regardless of age and gender, identifying 951 female atopic dermatitis patients of childbearing age, 29 of whom had been exposed to the drug during pregnancy (3%). The median duration of dupilumab treatment prior to conception was 22.5 weeks (range: 3-118). The median time of exposure to the drug during pregnancy was 6 weeks (range: 2-24). All the documented pregnancies were unplanned, and the drug was discontinued in all cases once pregnancy status was reported. The comparison of the study cohort and the control group found no significant drug-associated risk for adverse pregnancy, congenital, neonatal or post-partum outcomes. The absence of a statistically significant effect of exposure on the event was confirmed by bivariate analysis and multivariate analysis adjusted for other confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of pregnant patients exposed to dupilumab adds to the existing evidence concerning the safety of biologic agents in pregnancy. No safety issues were identified regarding the primary outcome assessed. In clinical practice, these data provide reassurance in case of dupilumab exposure during the first trimester. However, the continuous use of dupilumab throughout pregnancy warrants further research.

Multi-failure psoriasis patients: characterization of the patients and response to biological therapy in a multicenter Italian cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with psoriasis who have failed multiple biologic drugs have been defined as "multi-failure," although there are no clear data on the characteristics, comorbidities, and best treatment strategies for this population. Nowadays, given the next generation and the number of biologics available, patients are considered multi-failure when ≥4 biologics fail to achieve a good response. METHODS: Demographic characteristics and efficacy of anti-interleukin drugs in multi-failure patients were compared to a cohort of general psoriatic patients treated with IL-23 or IL-17 inhibitors. RESULTS: In total 97 multi-failure patients (≥4 lines of biologics) were compared with 1,057 patients in the general cohort. The current drugs in the multi-failure group were risankizumab (34), ixekizumab (23), guselkumab (21), brodalumab (7), tildrakizumab (5), ustekinumab (4), secukinumab (2), and certolizumab pegol (1). A significant difference was found in the multi-failure cohort for age of psoriasis onset (mean 29.7 vs. 35.1, P < 0.001), concurrent psoriatic arthritis (45.4 vs. 26.9%, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (30.9 vs. 10.9%, P < 0.001), and cardiovascular comorbidity (54.6 vs. 39.8%, P = 0.005). In multi-failure patients, current biological therapy showed a good initial response (PASI 90 and 100 of 41.24 and 27.84%, respectively, at 16 weeks); the response tended to decline after 40 weeks. Anti-IL-17 agents showed clinical superiority over IL-23 agents in terms of achieving PASI90 at 28 weeks (P < 0.001) and 40 weeks (P = 0.007), after which they reached a plateau. In contrast, IL-23 agents showed a slower but progressive improvement that was maintained for up to 52 weeks. A similar trend was also seen for PASI100 (28 weeks P = 0.032; 40 weeks P = 0.121). CONCLUSIONS: The multi-failure patient is characterized by many comorbidities and longstanding inflammatory disease that frequently precedes the introduction of systemic biologic therapy. Further studies are needed to identify more specific criteria that could be applied as a guideline by clinicians.

Safety of omalizumab in chronic urticaria during pregnancy: a real-life study.

BACKGROUND: Managing a pregnant patient with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is often challenging. Recent data have shown that most CSU treatments in pregnant patients are second-generation H1 antihistamines (sgAHs), while data on the safety of omalizumab are scant. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, in a routine clinical practice setting, the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with severe CSU refractory to sgAHs who either became pregnant during treatment or who started the drug during pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of women aged ≥ 18 years who were pregnant, who received one or more doses of omalizumab at any time during their pregnancy or who were taking omalizumab at the time of, or in the 8 weeks before, conception. RESULTS: Twenty-nine pregnant patients were evaluated: 23 (79%) conceived a child while taking omalizumab (group A), while 6 (21%) started omalizumab treatment during pregnancy (group B). Among patients in group A, we observed 23 births (21 liveborn singletons and 1 liveborn twin pair) and 1 miscarriage. Fifteen (65%) patients discontinued omalizumab after confirming their pregnancy, while eight (35%) were exposed to omalizumab during their entire pregnancy. In group B, omalizumab was introduced at a mean (SD) 10.83 (3.60) weeks' gestation and all patients were exposed to it until the end of pregnancy. In this group, there were seven liveborn infants (five singletons and one twin pair). No adverse events, pregnancy complications or congenital anomalies in newborns were recorded in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab for CSU treatment before and during pregnancy does not appear to have negative effects on maternal or fetal outcomes.

Artificial Intelligence in Skin Cancer Diagnosis: A Reality Check.

The field of skin cancer detection offers a compelling use case for the application of artificial intelligence (AI) within the realm of image-based diagnostic medicine. Through the analysis of large datasets, AI algorithms have the capacity to classify clinical or dermoscopic images with remarkable accuracy. Although these AI-based applications can operate both autonomously and under human supervision, the best results are achieved through a collaborative approach that leverages the expertise of both AI and human experts. However, it is important to note that most studies focus on assessing the diagnostic accuracy of AI in artificial settings rather than in real-world scenarios. Consequently, the practical utility of AI-assisted diagnosis in a clinical environment is still largely unknown. Furthermore, there exists a knowledge gap concerning the optimal use cases and deployment settings for these AI systems as well as the practical challenges that may arise from widespread implementation. This review explores the advantages and limitations of AI in a variety of real-world contexts, with a specific focus on its value to consumers, general practitioners, and dermatologists.

Effectiveness and Safety After a Switch to Tildrakizumab: A Real World Multicenter Italian Study in Psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: Tildrakizumab is a humanized IgG1κ monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23, approved in 2018 for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and survival of tildrakizumab in the medium term (48 weeks) in psoriatic patients failure to previous biologic treatment in a real world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter observational study that included adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, failure to previous biologic therapy, consecutively treated with tildrakizumab. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) values were recorded at baseline, at 12 and 48 weeks of treatment. Safety and tolerability of tildrakizumab were investigated by examining the presence of any adverse events. RESULTS: Overall 51 patients were enrolled. Baseline disease severity was moderate to severe with a mean PASI score of 19.2 ± 8.5, mean BSA of 16 ± 10.4, and mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 18.2 ± 6.8. A significant reduction in the mean PASI score was detected at 12 weeks of tildrakizumab therapy (3.5 ± 2.7, P < 0.001), with a further improvement at week 48 (0.6 ± 1.5, P < 0.001). At week 12, there was a great improvement in BSA score for all groups (P <0.001) with further increase at week 48. The effectiveness was confirmed also by DLQI assessment, with a significant decrease at week 12 and even more at week 48 (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the effectiveness of tildrakizumab in daily clinical practice in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Ixekizumab is effective in the long-term management in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results from an Italian retrospective cohort study (the LOTIXE study).

PURPOSE: Ixekizumab is a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The objective of this study was to describe the real-world long-term effectiveness of ixekizumab in patients with plaque psoriasis in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who were continuously treated with ixekizumab for at least 12 months. Patient data was obtained at 4-weeks, 12-weeks and 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-months after baseline (June 2017 and September 2019) from 10 sites. Results were analyzed by complete case approach, with sensitivity analysis performed to evaluate the impact of missing data. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were enrolled in the study. At Month 24, 94.3% of patients achieved PASI75 response, while 85.1 and 71.8% achieved PASI90 and PASI100, respectively; and 91.1% of the patients achieved absolute PASI score ≤2. Patients experienced psoriasis improvement at 4 weeks after starting treatment, and improvement was maintained with continued ixekizumab use. The quality of life of patients also improved significantly starting at Week 12, with sustained effect in the long term. CONCLUSION: This 24-month observational cohort study confirmed that ixekizumab is effective in the long-term management of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a real-life multicenter study-IL PSO (Italian landscape psoriasis).

Introduction: Bimekizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets Interleukin-17 A and F, approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. While bimekizumab has been evaluated in several phase-III clinical trials, real-world evidence is still very limited. Method: This multicenter retrospective study included patients affected by plaque psoriasis treated with bimekizumab from May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2023, at 19 Italian referral hospitals. Patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic treatments were included. The effectiveness of bimekizumab was evaluated in terms of reduction in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) compared with baseline at weeks 4 and 16. The main outcomes were the percentages of patients achieving an improvement of at least 75% (PASI75), 90% (PASI90) and 100% (PASI100) in PASI score. Results: The study included 237 patients who received at least one injection of bimekizumab. One hundred and seventy-one patients and 114 reached four and 16 weeks of follow-up, respectively. Complete skin clearance was achieved by 43.3% and 75.4% of patients at weeks 4 and 16, respectively. At week 16, 86.8% of patients reported no impact on their quality of life. At week 16, there were no significant differences between bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients in terms of PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were oral candidiasis (10.1%). No severe AEs or AEs leading to discontinuation were observed throughout the study. Conclusion: Our experience supports the effectiveness and tolerability of bimekizumab in a real-world setting with similar results compared with phase-III clinical trials.