T-Cadherin Deficiency Is Associated with Increased Blood Pressure after Physical Activity.

T-cadherin is a regulator of blood vessel remodeling and angiogenesis, involved in adiponectin-mediated protective effects in the cardiovascular system and in skeletal muscles. GWAS study has previously demonstrated a SNP in the Cdh13 gene to be associated with hypertension. However, the role of T-cadherin in regulating blood pressure has not been experimentally elucidated. Herein, we generated Cdh13∆Exon3 mice lacking exon 3 in the Cdh13 gene and described their phenotype. Cdh13∆Exon3 mice exhibited normal gross morphology, life expectancy, and breeding capacity. Meanwhile, their body weight was considerably lower than of WT mice. When running on a treadmill, the time spent running and the distance covered by Cdh13∆Exon3 mice was similar to that of WT. The resting blood pressure in Cdh13∆Exon3 mice was slightly higher than in WT, however, upon intensive physical training their systolic blood pressure was significantly elevated. While adiponectin content in the myocardium of Cdh13∆Exon3 and WT mice was within the same range, adiponectin plasma level was 4.37-fold higher in Cdh13∆Exon3 mice. Moreover, intensive physical training augmented the AMPK phosphorylation in the skeletal muscles and myocardium of Cdh13∆Exon3 mice as compared to WT. Our data highlight a critically important role of T-cadherin in regulation of blood pressure and stamina in mice, and may shed light on the pathogenesis of hypertension.

The Missing Protein: Is T-Cadherin a Previously Unknown GPI-Anchored Receptor on Platelets?

The membrane of platelets contains at least one uncharacterized glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein according to the literature. Moreover, there is not enough knowledge on the receptor of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) mediating rapid Ca2+ signaling in platelets. Coincidentally, expression of a GPI-anchored protein T-cadherin increases LDL-induced Ca2+ signaling in nucleated cells. Here we showed evidence that supports the hypothesis about the presence of T-cadherin on platelets. The presence of T-cadherin on the surface of platelets and megakaryocytes was proven using antibodies whose specificity was tested on several negative and positive control cells by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Using phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, the presence of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor in the platelet T-cadherin form as well as in other known forms was confirmed. We showed by immunoblotting that the significant part of T-cadherin was detected in specific membrane domains (detergent Triton X-114 resistant) and the molecular weight of this newly identified protein was greater than that of T-cadherin from nucleated cells. Nevertheless, polymerase chain reaction data confirmed only the presence of isoform-1 of T-cadherin in platelets and megakaryocytes, which was also present in nucleated cells. We observed the redistribution of this newly identified protein after the activation of platelets, but only further work may explain its functional importance. Thus, our data described T-cadherin with some post-translational modifications as a new GPI-anchored protein on human platelets.

Analysis of GPI-Anchored Receptor Distribution and Dynamics in Live Cells by Tag-mediated Enzymatic Labeling and FRET.

The analysis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored receptor distribution and dynamics in live cells is challenging, because their clusters exhibit subdiffraction-limited sizes and are highly dynamic. However, the cellular response depends on the GPI-anchored receptor clusters' distribution and dynamics. Here, we compare three approaches to GPI-anchored receptor labeling (with antibodies, fluorescent proteins, and enzymatically modified small peptide tags) and use several variants of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) detection by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry in order to obtain insight into the distribution and the ligand-induced dynamics of GPI-anchored receptors. We found that the enzyme-mediated site-specific fluorescence labeling of T-cadherin modified with a short peptide tag (12 residues in length) have several advantages over labeling by fluorescent proteins or antibodies, including (i) the minimized distortion of the protein's properties, (ii) the possibility to use a cell-impermeable fluorescent substrate that allows for selective labeling of surface-exposed proteins in live cells, and (iii) superior control of the donor to acceptor molar ratio. We successfully detected the FRET of GPI-anchored receptors, T-cadherin, and ephrin-A1, without ligands, and showed in real time that adiponectin induces stable T-cadherin cluster formation. In this paper (which is complementary to our recent research (Balatskaya et al., 2019)), we present the practical aspects of labeling and the heteroFRET measurements of GPI-anchored receptors to study their dynamics on a plasma membrane in live cells.

Different spatiotemporal organization of GPI-anchored T-cadherin in response to low-density lipoprotein and adiponectin.

BACKGROUND: Unlike other cadherins, T-cadherin does not mediate strong cell-cell adhesion. It has two soluble ligands: low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-molecular-weight (HMW) adiponectin. LDL binding to T-cadherin induces calcium signaling, migration, and proliferation, and has proatherogenic effects, but adiponectin binding promotes antiatherogenic effects. The reasons for this difference and mechanism of signal transduction by glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored T-cadherin are unknown. METHODS: We compared the ability of LDL and HMW adiponectin to induce calcium signaling, T-cadherin clustering and internalization. We measured calcium signaling in smooth muscle cells and T-cadherin expressing HEK293 using single-cell imaging. To study receptor clustering, we tested three different T-cadherin labeling strategies and then utilized confocal microscopy and flow cytometry assays based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). RESULTS: Enzymatically labeled T-cadherin retained its cellular localization and physiological activity, features that were otherwise affected by fluorescent proteins and antibodies. This labeling method allowed us to study T-cadherin clustering dynamics at the cell surface. HMW adiponectin induced the formation of stable T-cadherin clusters while LDL induced short-lived clusters. Cellular responses were also different: LDL triggered cholesterol- and actin-dependent calcium signaling without internalization while adiponectin promoted the opposite effect. CONCLUSIONS: We revealed distinct ligand-specific T-cadherin clustering and its ability to induce internalization or intracellular calcium signaling that likely explains the different physiological effects of LDL and HMW adiponectin. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: This work highlights the importance of GPI-anchored receptor clustering dynamics in mediating cellular responses. Different ligands can induce different effects in an identical cell via the same receptor.