The extent and magnitude of islet T cell infiltration as powerful tools to define the progression to type 1 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Insulitis is not present in all islets, and it is elusive in humans. Although earlier studies focused on islets that fulfilled certain criteria (e.g. ≥15 CD45+ cells or ≥6 CD3+ cells), there is a fundamental lack of understanding of the infiltration dynamics in terms of its magnitude (i.e. how much) and extent (i.e. where). Here, we aimed to perform an in-depth characterisation of T cell infiltration by investigating islets with moderate (1-5 CD3+ cells) and high (≥6 CD3+ cells) infiltration in individuals with and without type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Pancreatic tissue sections from 15 non-diabetic, eight double autoantibody-positive and ten type 1 diabetic (0-2 years of disease duration) organ donors were obtained from the Network for Pancreatic Organ Donors with Diabetes, and stained for insulin, glucagon, CD3 and CD8 by immunofluorescence. T cell infiltration was quantified in a total of 8661 islets using the software QuPath. The percentage of infiltrated islets and islet T cell density were calculated. To help standardise the analysis of T cell infiltration, we used cell density data to develop a new T cell density threshold capable of differentiating non-diabetic and type 1 diabetic donors. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that 17.1% of islets in non-diabetic donors, 33% of islets in autoantibody-positive and 32.5% of islets in type 1 diabetic donors were infiltrated by 1 to 5 CD3+ cells. Islets infiltrated by ≥6 CD3+ cells were rare in non-diabetic donors (0.4%) but could be found in autoantibody-positive (4.5%) and type 1 diabetic donors (8.2%). CD8+ and CD8- populations followed similar patterns. Likewise, T cell density was significantly higher in the islets of autoantibody-positive donors (55.4 CD3+ cells/mm2) and type 1 diabetic donors (74.8 CD3+ cells/mm2) compared with non-diabetic individuals (17.3 CD3+ cells/mm2), which was accompanied by higher exocrine T cell density in type 1 diabetic individuals. Furthermore, we showed that the analysis of a minimum of 30 islets and the use of a reference mean value for T cell density of 30 CD3+ cells/mm2 (the 30-30 rule) can differentiate between non-diabetic and type 1 diabetic donors with high specificity and sensitivity. In addition, it can classify autoantibody-positive individuals as non-diabetic or type 1 diabetic-like. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our data indicates that the proportion of infiltrated islets and T cell density change dramatically during the course of type 1 diabetes, and these changes can be already observed in double autoantibody-positive individuals. This suggests that, as disease progresses, T cell infiltration extends throughout the pancreas, reaching the islets and exocrine compartment. While it predominantly targets insulin-containing islets, large accumulations of cells are rare. Our study fulfils the need to further understand T cell infiltration, not only after diagnosis but also in individuals with diabetes-related autoantibodies. Furthermore, the development and application of new analytical tools based on T cell infiltration, like the 30-30 rule, will allow us to correlate islet infiltration with demographic and clinical variables with the aim of identifying individuals at the very early stages of the disease.

Islet expression of type I interferon response sensors is associated with immune infiltration and viral infection in type 1 diabetes.

Previous results indicate the presence of an interferon (IFN) signature in type 1 diabetes (T1D), capable of inducing chronic inflammation and compromising b cell function. Here, we determined the expression of the IFN response markers MxA, PKR, and HLA-I in the islets of autoantibody-positive and T1D donors. We found that these markers can be coexpressed in the same islet, are more abundant in insulin-containing islets, are highly expressed in islets with insulitis, and their expression levels are correlated with the presence of the enteroviral protein VP1. The expression of these markers was associated with down-regulation of multiple genes in the insulin secretion pathway. The coexistence of an IFN response and a microbial stress response is likely to prime islets for immune destruction. This study highlights the importance of therapeutic interventions aimed at eliminating potentially persistent infections and diminishing inflammation in individuals with T1D.