Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Nefrologia ; 31(4): 449-56, 2011.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21738248

ABSTRACT

Advance care planning (ACP) and the subsequent advance directive document (ADD), previously known as "living wills", have not been widely used in Spain. The Ethics Group from the Spanish Society of Nephrology has developed a survey in order to investigate the opinion of dialysis patients regarding the ADD and end-of-life care. Patients received documentation explaining ACP and filled out a survey about their familiarity with and approval of the ADD. Seven hospital dialysis centres participated in the study for a total of 416 active dialysis patients. Questionnaires were distributed to 263 patients, 154 of which answered (69.2% completed them without assistance). The rates for ADD implementation (7.9%) and designation of a representative person (6.6%) were very low. Most of the patients clearly expressed their wishes about irreversible coma, vegetative state, dementia and untreatable disease. More than 65% did not want mechanical ventilation, chronic dialysis, tube feeding or resuscitation if cardiorespiratory arrest occurred. They reported that an ADD could be done before starting dialysis but most thought that it should be offered only to those who requested it (65% vs 34%). In conclusion, patients have clear wishes about end-of-life care, although these desires had not been documented due to the very low implementation of the ADD.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , Kidney Failure, Chronic/psychology , Peritoneal Dialysis/psychology , Renal Dialysis/psychology , Terminal Care/psychology , Aged , Attitude to Death , Comorbidity , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Patient Rights , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Transplant Proc ; 41(6): 2095-8, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19715841

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Most immunosuppressive protocols in de novo renal transplantation include tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid (MMF/MPA) and prednisone. A variable percentage of patients show intolerance to MMF/MPA needing a reduction, interruption, or suspension of the drug, thereby exposing the patient to a greater risk of a rejection episode. The association of everolimus and tacrolimus may prove to be an alternative option in such cases. The aim of this study was to present our clinical experience, evaluating the incidence of graft rejection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a descriptive study of 19 kidney transplant patients from 2001-2008 who were treated with tacrolimus, MMF/MPA, and prednisone and displayed gastrointestinal or hematological adverse events to MMF/MPA, which were addressed with everolimus. We analyzed parameters up to 2 years after the change. RESULTS: The doses and levels of everolimus were increased progressively. At the same time, we decreased the doses and levels of tacrolimus. Renal function remained stable during the period and there was no case of a rejection episode during the 2 years. Only 5 patients (26%) showed side effects which were attributable to everolimus; 36% of patients required starting and/or increasing the erythropoietin dose, 15% required iron supplements, 15% required diuretics, and 31% began or increased treatment with statins. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggested that a combination of tacrolimus and everolimus may be a safe, effective alternative for kidney transplant patients who show intolerance to MMF/MPA.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Mycophenolic Acid/adverse effects , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Creatinine/blood , Creatinine/metabolism , Drug Antagonism , Drug Therapy, Combination , Everolimus , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Survival/immunology , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Sirolimus/therapeutic use
3.
Transplant Proc ; 41(6): 2134-6, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19715854

ABSTRACT

Whenever graft function is good and proteinuria is under control, many reports describe the efficacy and safety of the conversion to Everolimus (EVL) among stable kidney recepients, simultaneously withdrawing the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). However, there are few publications that evaluate the role of EVL in patients with decreased renal function. We describe our experience with 22 stable renal transplant recipients whose serum creatinine concentrations were >2 mg/dL and proteinuria <1000 mg/24 h who underwent an abrupt switch from a CNI to EVL. Conversion was simple, well-tolerated, and safe using an initial dose of 1-3 mg/d that was sufficient to achieve the recommended levels of 3-8 ng/dL. The adverse events were expected; most of them were of medium intensity. Globally, over the 24 months follow-up, there was improved renal function despite the initial creatinine. The improvement was greater when the switch was performed during the first year after transplantation. Two patients lost their grafts after a dramatic evolution with development of nephrotic syndrome and increasing creatinine. In our experience, conversion to EVL is a safe alternative among patients with chronic allograft nephropathy or nephrotoxicity due to CNI, even in patients with significantly decreased renal function at the time of the switch.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Creatinine/blood , Everolimus , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/drug therapy , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrotic Syndrome/etiology , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Young Adult
4.
Hipertensión (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 25(1): 26-31, ene.2008. ilus, tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-63382

ABSTRACT

La morbimortalidad por problemas cardiovasculares en pacientes en programas de hemodiálisis periódica es mayor que en la población general, coincidiendo a la vez más de un factor de riesgo, entre los que destacan la hipertensión arterial, dislipidemia o alteraciones de los hidratos de carbono, entre otros. Siguiendo los criterios de la ATP III (Adult Treatment Panel), se han estudiado los pacientes que se engloban en el síndrome metabólico valorando los factores de riesgo más frecuentes que lo constituyen. La obesidad, tanto medida por el índice de masa corporal (IMC) como por la circunferencia de cintura, es el factor que se ha observado con mayor incidencia. La resistencia a la insulina, medida por el test de HOMA, se ha incluido igualmente en el estudio por sus implicaciones en esta patología


Cardiovascular disease morbidity-mortality is higher in patients on periodic dialysis than in the general population, there being more than one risk factor at the same time. Among these, hypertension, dyslipidemia and carbohydrate alterations stand out. Following the ATP III (Adult Treatment Panel) criteria, patients included under the metabolic syndrome have been studied, evaluating the most important risk factors that make it up. Obesity, measured with body mass index (BMI) or with the waist circumference, is the factor observed with the greatest incidence. In addition, insulin resistance measured by the HOMA test has been included due to its relevant implications in this disease


Subject(s)
Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Renal Dialysis , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Body Mass Index , Insulin Resistance
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...