ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The mechanism of persistent chronic pain after TAPP and OLR remains controversial. Therefore, more prospective and well-designed studies are needed to determine the predictive risk factors that will lead to better pain prevention and possibly elimination. The aim of the present study was to investigate the risk factors of chronic pain after TAPP repair and OLR in a single institution. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study of propensity score-matched patients who underwent TAPP or OLR surgery between 2008 and 2018 was conducted. To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:1 matching using 6 covariates to generate the propensity score. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients treated with TAPP and 424 patients treated with OLR were balanced to 400 pairs of matched patients. The patients' age (P < 0.001), BMI (P < 0.001), foreign body sensation within 3 months after surgery (P < 0.001), and persistent sensation loss (P = 0.002) were different between the two groups. The OLR group had a shorter operative time than did the TAPP group (P < 0.001). The univariate analysis of factors predicting a difference in VAS between the preoperative assessment and the assessment 3 months after surgery showed that the type of surgery (P = 0.004), hernia grade (P = 0.001), type of mesh (P < 0.001), presence of scrotal invasion (P = 0.024), and foreign body sensation within 3 months (P = 0.047) were risk factors. The multivariate analysis revealed that only hernia grade III (CI - 8.524, - 2.783; P < 0.001), OLR operation type (CI 1.069, 4.987; P = 0.002), and the use of polypropylene mesh (CI - 5.400, - 1.489; P = 0.001) were independently associated with chronic pain. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that compared to OLR, TAPP leads to less postoperative pain and a better long-term quality of life.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/etiology , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Propensity Score , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) causes debilitating malnutrition and leads to deterioration of the immune response. However, the concept of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is controversial when applied to patients with AGC. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the PNI after gastrectomy in patients with AGC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted using propensity score matching (PSM) in gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent resection via laparoscopic or open surgery between 2014 and 2017. To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:1 matching using 5 covariates. RESULTS: The resection margins (P < 0.001) and LNM (P = 0.004) were significantly different between the two groups. In univariate analysis, poor tumor differentiation (P = 0.038) (R1+R2, P = 0.004), vascular and neural invasion (P < 0.001), and a PNI<50 (P < 0.001) were associated with poor recurrence-free survival (RFS). In multivariate analysis, a PNI<50 (hazard ratio (HR), 12.993; P < 0.001) was a risk factor for RFS. Univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) revealed that a PNI<50 (P < 0.001) (R1+R2,P = 0.006) and vascular and neural invasion (P < 0.001) were risk factors. In subsequent multivariate analysis, a PNI<50 (HR, 24.501; P < 0.001) was a significant risk factor for OS. Clinical assessments performed during a 12.34 (±5.050) month follow-up revealed that OS (P < 0.001) and RFS (P < 0.001) were worse in patients with a low PNI (<50) than in matched patients with a high PNI. CONCLUSION: A low PNI is a strong predictor of unfavorable RFS and OS in patients with AGC.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Gastrectomy/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , Propensity Score , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , China/epidemiology , Endosonography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laparoscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Period , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Rate/trends , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The perioperative serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed to predict adverse prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its interpretation remains unclear. The present study aimed to clarify the prognostic value of NLR in predicting survival among CRC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective, propensity score-matched study of adenocarcinoma patients who underwent D3 lymphadenectomy via laparoscopic or open surgery between 2010 and 2016 was conducted. A cutoff of 3.5 was used based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. To overcome selection biases, we performed a 1:1 match using six covariates. RESULTS: The high-preoperative NLR group had a higher recurrence rate than the low group (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that increased NLR (P < 0.001), N1 (P = 0.016), and N2 (P < 0.001) were associated with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multivariate analysis showed that N2 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.492; P = 0.008) was an adverse prognostic factor for RFS. Univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) revealed that high perioperative NLR (P = 0.001), N1 (P = 0.01), N2 (P < 0.001), and distant metastasis (P < 0.001) were adverse prognostic factors. Subsequent multivariate analysis showed that M1 (HR, 3.973; P < 0.001) and N2 (HR, 2.381; P = 0.013) were highly adverse factors for OS. Clinical assessments performed during a 21.14 (±16.20)-mo follow-up revealed that OS (P = 0.001) and RFS (P < 0.001) were worse in the high-perioperative group than in the low group between the matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: An elevated preoperative NLR is a strong predictor of worse RFS and OS in CRC patients.
