Pubertal Status at the Time of Fertility Preservation in Transgender Girls.

BACKGROUND: Puberty blockade and gender-affirming hormone therapy can impair fertility. Counseling on fertility preservation is important before initiation of therapy. Our study aimed to assess Tanner staging and the presence of virilizing secondary sex characteristics at the time of sperm collection and correlate the viability of sperm with the Tanner staging and degree of virilization. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 23 transgender girls referred to pediatric urology at our academic pediatric transgender clinic for fertility preservation counseling was performed. At the initial visit before treatment, pubertal staging along with the assessment of virilizing secondary characteristics was performed. The semen analyses were evaluated for volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count, motility, and total motile count. RESULTS: Of the first 23 transgender girls evaluated and counseled, 8 transgender females successfully produced a sperm sample for cryopreservation. The average testicular volume was 18.5 ml and ranged from 12 ml to 20 ml. The median semen parameters were at or above the 2021 World Health Organization threshold. The 8 transgender females who successfully underwent fertility preservation presented with at least 1 secondary sex characteristic. In 1 subject with Tanner stage 3 pubic hair development and a testicular volume of 12 ml, only voice change was reported. Facial hair and laryngeal prominence were not present on examination. CONCLUSION: More than a third of our patients who accepted a referral to pediatric urology agreed to produce a sperm sample for cryopreservation. All of these patients successfully preserved sperm. With counseling and early referral to pediatric urology, a high percentage of fertility preservation in transgender girls was achieved.

Does KUB play a role in the diagnosis of bladder bowel dysfunction?

INTRODUCTION: Kidney ureter bladder radiography (KUB) is widely used for the evaluation of constipation in children with bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD); however, there is varying evidence to support its routine diagnostic use. One drawback to KUB is radiation exposure. The dangers of radiation in children are well-documented, and per As Low As Reasonably Achievable, non-beneficial radiation should be avoided. This risk is especially high in children who undergo repeated imaging in the follow up of constipation treatment. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the utility of KUB in diagnosing children with BBD by comparing it to four diagnostic tests and/or validated instruments: the Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS), Rome IV criteria, rectal diameter on ultrasound (RD), and the Bristol Stool Form Score (BSFS). STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively enrolled a cohort of patients presenting to an academic pediatric urology practice with symptoms of BBD. Severity of stool burden on KUB (mild, moderate, or severe), RD on ultrasound (≥3.4 cm), DVSS, Rome IV, and BSFS were obtained for each patient. All imaging was interpreted by a pediatric radiologist and pediatric urologist. Primary outcomes were the association between the four diagnostic tests and KUB stool burden. Bivariate analysis of all individual variables versus KUB was performed, as well as multivariate regressions to determine if multiple measures were predictive of KUB stool burden when combined. RESULTS: Between October 2020 and May 2022, 50 patients were enrolled. All children were under the age of 18, with a median age of 8 years (IQR 3-13). 38 % were male. Median BMI-for-age-percentile was 80.8 (IQR 50.3-98.3). When comparing individual variables to KUB in bivariate analyses, it was found that RD on ultrasound is predictive of significant stool burden on KUB (p = 0.03). No other individual variables were predictive. In the multivariate analyses, no combination of tests was found to be predictive of KUB. DISCUSSION: We compared the effectiveness of four commonly used diagnostic tests in children with BBD to validate the use of KUB. In conclusion, our results support the use of RD on ultrasound as a non-radiating alternative to KUB to assess stool burden. Data also suggest that KUB for fecal load does not correlate with urinary (DVSS) or bowel (Rome IV, BSFS) symptoms in BBD, and that symptoms scores should still be used independently for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment response. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, KUB has a limited role in the diagnosis of BBD.

The Assessment of TikTok as a Source of Quality Health Information on Varicoceles.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of varicocele information on TikTok, a popular video platform that adolescent patients are now turning to as a source of medical information before visiting a doctor. METHODS: Using the key word "varicocele," we retrieved the top 225 videos listed on TikTok in May 2022. We extracted general video and engagement data. Video information was coded and analyzed for the completeness of different types of content (definition, symptoms, evaluation, management, and outcomes). The quality of consumer health information was rated using the DISCERN instrument. RESULTS: Thirty-six videos met inclusion criteria; 17 were created by general users, 16 by healthcare professionals or systems (2 by urologists), and 3 by scientific communities. Healthcare professionals had more views than non-healthcare (P = .05). The quality of health information using the DISCERN instrument was "poor" from health care professional videos and "very poor" from non-health care professionals. However, the quality of information provided by healthcare professionals was statistically better than that of non-healthcare (P< .05). Video content mainly focused on symptoms: 50% of videos from healthcare providers had some or extensive content and 41% of non-healthcare had some content. 23% of videos had misinformation. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of information for varicoceles on TikTok is not acceptable and does not meet patient needs. It is imperative that urologists create robust, accurate content, and partner with these platforms to connect users with higher quality information. TikTok users should also be mindful that information may not be medically accurate.