Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 Questionnaire and Surgical Outcome in Single-Port Surgery for Benign Adnexal Disease: Observational Comparison with Traditional Laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic surgery has been demonstrated as a valid approach in almost all gynaecologic procedures including malignant diseases. Benefits of the minimally invasive approach over traditional open surgery have been well demonstrated in terms of minimal perioperative morbidity and reduced postoperative pain and hospital stay duration, with consequent quick postoperative recovery (Medeiros et al. (2009)). Single-port surgery resurfaced in gynaecology surgery in recent years and renewed interest among other surgeons and within the industry to develop this field (Podolsky et al. (2009)). Patient satisfaction is emerging as an increasingly important measure of quality which represents a complex entity that is dependent on patient demographics, comorbidities, disease, and, to a large extent, patient expectations (Tomlinson and Ko (2006)). It can be broadly thought to refer to all relevant experiences and processes associated with health care delivery (Jackson et al. (2001)). In this study we aim to compare single-port surgery (SPS) with conventional laparoscopy in terms of patient satisfaction using the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaire. We also evaluate the main surgical outcomes of both minimally invasive approaches.

Sentinel node mapping in high risk endometrial cancer after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation.

INTRODUCTION: Occult endometrial cancer after supracervical hysterectomy is very uncommon. Even if optimal management of those rare cases is still unproven, to guide the need for further therapies, restaging should be recommended in this situation. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report of a 60-year old woman with occult high risk endometrial cancer after supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation. We describe the feasibility of laparoscopic intraoperative sentinel node identification with cervical stump removing to restage the suspicious early stage high risk endometrial cancer. DISCUSSION: In high risk endometrial cancer surgical restaging is important, considering that 10-35% of cases can present pelvic nodal metastasis. To reduce the treatment related morbidity maintaining the benefit of surgical staging, with a negative preoperative PET/CT, we performed a laparoscopic SN mapping with cervical stump removing. CONCLUSION: This report highlight the fact that SN mapping with cervical injection is a feasible and safe technique also without the uterine corpus after supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation.