Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of cetuximab with cisplatin/carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumor: Result from phase II studies.

The pharmacokinetics and potential drug-drug interactions between cetuximab and cisplatin or carboplatin from two studies (JXBA and JXBB) were evaluated. These studies were multicenter, open-label phase II trials designed to evaluate the drug-drug interactions between cetuximab (400 mg m-2 initial dose) and cisplatin (JXBA; 100 mg m-2) or carboplatin (JXBB; area under the curve [AUC] = 5 mg × min mL-1) with or without 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Concentrations of cetuximab, cisplatin and carboplatin were determined using analytical methods. The safety and tolerability of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin was also determined in all treated patients. The JXBA study showed that cetuximab serum concentrations were similar when cetuximab was administered alone or in combination with cisplatin. The Cmax, tmax and overall AUC for the cetuximab group (194 µg mL-1, 2.0 hour, 14 900 µg × h mL-1) and the cetuximab and cisplatin combination group (192 µg mL-1, 1.99 hour, 16 300 µg × h mL-1) were similar. The JXBB study showed that mean cetuximab serum concentrations were similar when cetuximab was administered alone or in combination with carboplatin. The Cmax, tmax and overall AUC for the cetuximab group (199 µg mL-1, 1.15 hour, 17 200 µg × h mL-1) and the cetuximab and carboplatin combination group (199 µg mL-1, 3.17 h, 16 800 µg × h mL-1) were similar. Both studies showed that the safety profile was consistent with known side effects of cetuximab, platinum-based therapies and 5-FU. There was no clinically relevant change in cetuximab pharmacokinetics when it was administered in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin.

Exposure-response relationship of olaratumab for survival outcomes and safety when combined with doxorubicin in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Olaratumab is a recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against PGDFRα. Olaratumab plus doxorubicin improved survivalversus doxorubicin in an open-label, randomised phase 2 soft tissue sarcoma (STS) trial. We characterised the olaratumab exposure-response relationship for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. METHODS: PFS and OS data from the 133 patients enrolled in the phase 2 study were analysed using time-to-event modelling. The effect of olaratumab on PFS/OS was explored using the trough serum concentration after cycle 1 (Cmin1) and the average concentration throughout treatment (Cavg). The rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was compared across olaratumab exposure quartiles. RESULTS: PFS and OS were described by models with an exponential hazard function and inhibitory EMAX functions to describe the effect of olaratumab, regardless of the PK endpoint. The olaratumab EC50s for PFS (ECmin150 = 82.0 µg/mL, ECavg50 = 179 µg/mL) and OS (ECmin150 = 66.1 µg/mL, ECavg50 = 134 µg/mL) corresponded to the median and 25th percentile of Cmin1/Cavg in the study, respectively. Maximum predicted improvement in the hazard ratio for OS and PFS was approximately 75% and 60%, respectively. There was no change in the rate of TEAEs with increasing olaratumab serum levels. CONCLUSIONS: PFS/OS benefits occurred without a rate change in TEAEs across quartiles. Maximum benefit in OS was achieved in the upper three quartiles and a potential of early disease progression in the lower quartile of olaratumab serum exposure. These results prompted a loading dose strategy in the ongoing phase 3 STS trial.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Olaratumab, an Anti-PDGFRα Human Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with Advanced and/or Metastatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Olaratumab is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody that binds to platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα). In a randomized phase II study, olaratumab plus doxorubicin met its predefined primary endpoint for progression-free survival and achieved a highly significant improvement in overall survival versus doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). In this study, we characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of olaratumab in a cancer patient population. METHODS: Olaratumab was tested at 15 or 20 mg/kg in four phase II studies (in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer, glioblastoma multiforme, STS, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors) as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy. PK sampling was performed to measure olaratumab serum levels. PK data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling techniques using NONMEM®. RESULTS: The PKs of olaratumab were best described by a two-compartment PK model with linear clearance (CL). Patient body weight was found to have a significant effect on both CL and central volume of distribution (V 1), whereas tumor size significantly affected CL. A small subset of patients developed treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (TE-ADAs); however, TE-ADAs did not have any effect on CL or PK time course of olaratumab. There was no difference in the PKs of olaratumab between patients who received olaratumab as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The PKs of olaratumab were best described by a model with linear disposition. Patient body weight and tumor size were found to be significant covariates. The PKs of olaratumab were not affected by immunogenicity or chemotherapeutic agents.

A phase I study of enzastaurin combined with pemetrexed in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Enzastaurin is an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, which suppress signaling through protein kinase C-beta and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT pathway. Preclinical studies suggested synergic antitumor activity of enzastaurin and pemetrexed. We conducted this phase I study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of this combination in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: An oral daily dose of 500 mg enzastaurin was administered once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in combination with 500 mg/m pemetrexed on day 1 in repeated 21-day cycles. Cycle 1 started with a 7-day enzastaurin lead-in treatment that preceded pemetrexed administration: a loading dose of 1125 mg enzastaurin on day 1 followed by a 500 mg total daily dose on days 2-7. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated QD (n = 6) or BID (n = 6). One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 QTc prolongation) was reported in the QD cohort. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were slightly increased in the BID cohort compared with the QD cohort. After beginning the combination therapy, enzastaurin exposures decreased slightly but remained above the target plasma concentration of 1400 nmol/L. Compared with QD, there was a higher exposure with BID. The enzastaurin dosing regimen (QD or BID) had no effect on pemetrexed pharmacokinetics. Two patients had partial responses as defined by RECIST. Five patients received more than 10 cycles of treatment without disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Both schedules of enzastaurin in combination with pemetrexed were well tolerated and clinically active in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The relationship among shame, guilt, and self-efficacy.

The perception of the self has been one of the fundamental constructs in psychotherapy, with attention devoted to shame, guilt, and, more recently, one's perception of ability to influence a situation-that is, self-efficacy; however, the relationship between these constructs merits scholarly attention. In the present study, researchers analyze the survey responses of 194 college students to determine relationships between shame and guilt as measured by the Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA 3, Tangney & Dearing, 2002), and self-efficacy as measured by the general and social self-efficacy scales (by Sherer, Maddux, Mercandante, Prentice-Dunn, Jacobs, & Rogers, 1982). Results support a hypothesis that higher shame scores were related to reduced self-efficacy; however, scores did not reveal a significant correlation between guilt and self-efficacy. Post-hoc analyses suggest some differences based on gender and private-versus-public school setting. The researchers draw theoretical and counseling implications from the findings.

A construcao social dos papeis sexuais femininos

Esta revisao e uma tentativa de produzir uma representacao holistica, mas nao exaustiva, dos papeis sexuais femininos no Brasil. Comecamos tracando o papel historico-politico das mulheres do Brasil Colonial ate o movimento feminista moderno, enfocando tres questoes correntes: planejamento familiar, creches e violencia contra a mulher. A seguir, examinamos as normas culturais do machismo e do marianismo. Finalmente, discutimos os avancos que as mulheres fizeram no Brasil na ultima decada (desde a Constituicao de 1988), chamando a atencao para uma questao que tem sido grandemente ignorada: o assedio sexual.