Optimising postoperative care: Same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five years of records were retrospectively analysed. Length of stay categorised patients into Groups 1 (same-day discharge) and 2 (standard-length discharge). Logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for clinicodemographic factors. Student's t-test compared continuous bladder irrigation and catheter dwell times. RESULTS: A total of 459 patients were identified between 2016 and 2021, 280 in Group 1 and 179 in Group 2, with median ages of 71.0 (interquartile range 36-92) and 72.0 (interquartile range 47-101) years (p = 0.067), respectively. Same-day discharge rates notably increased post-2018 (p = 0.025). Median prostate tissue resected in Group 2 was 7.1g (3.4-12.4g) and in Group 1 was 4.9g (2.4-10.2g; p = 0.034). While continuous bladder irrigation >1 hour was significantly lower in Group 1 than Group 2 (96.8% versus 27.4%; p = 0.0001), catheter dwell times were comparable (70.1 and 70.8 hours, respectively). Control-adjusted results showed a 40% reduction in emergency department representation odds for Group 1 compared with Group 2 (odds ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.99; p = 0.04). Length of stay was not significantly associated with hospital readmissions (p = 0.11). Continuous bladder irrigation for <1 hour in Group 1 was associated with a reduced emergency department representation (odds ratio = 0.43; 95% confidence interval = 0.197-0.980) but not readmission (odds ratio = 0.413; 95% confidence interval = 0.166-1.104). CONCLUSIONS: Same-day discharge post-transurethral resection of the prostate may be a viable and safe option for carefully selected patients.

Rising Tides: Challenges and Opportunities for Women in the Urologic Workforce.

The number of practicing female urologists has increased from < 2% in 1980 to 9.2% in 2018. Despite this increase, urology trails far behind medical fields overall and surgical subspecialties, in achieving gender parity. Barriers, such as pervasive biases and institutional policies, exist at the medical student, resident, and practicing urologist levels. Once recognized as detrimental, action can be taken to combat these forces to allow for advancement of women in the field of urology. This will result in a richer workforce better able to serve its patient population and advance the field.

SpaceOAR Hydrogel Present 32 Weeks After Instillation Prevents Neobladder Creation in Patient Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystoprostatectomy.

Background: The injection of hydrogel in between the anterior rectal wall and prostate protects the rectum from the radiation field in men undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Multicenter prospective trials have demonstrated safety of the material, and that liquefication and reabsorption of the material occur roughly 12 weeks after injection. Other studies have noted the presence of the hydrogel up to 24 weeks after injection and documented significant complications with its use. In this study we discuss a patient in whom hydrogel was discovered in the anterior rectal wall who was undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy 32 weeks after injection, and how this precluded creation of a neobladder. Case Presentation: A 64-year-old Caucasian man with a history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension was diagnosed with unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. He underwent injection of hydrogel followed by radiotherapy. He subsequently developed hematuria and carcinoma in situ and high grade T1 nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer were diagnosed. Thirty-two weeks later, he underwent robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy. The patient was originally planned for neobladder creation but intraoperative findings of persistent hydrogel in between rectum and prostate precluded this reconstruction and necessitated construction of an ileal conduit. Conclusion: Urologists should be aware of the fact that SpaceOAR hydrogel can persist beyond the expected 12- to 24-week dissolution period. In a patient who requires a radical cystectomy, the persistent presence of that gel may preclude the creation of a neobladder. Preoperative imaging to identify persistence vs dissolution of the gel would facilitate better preoperative patient counseling.

Contemporary Assessment of Match Violations within Urology: an Opportunity for Ethical Leadership.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The primary aim of this review is to: (1) adequately define Match violations, (2) thoroughly examine the nature and scope of Match violations in the American Urologic Association (AUA) Urology Match, and (3) propose and recommend policy guidelines, including consequences for applicants and programs, as it pertains to Match violations. These recommendations are intended to affect change at the level of the AUA and Society of Academic Urology (SAU) that more effectively mitigates future violations, intentional or not. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a paucity of specific guidelines published by the AUA on what constitutes a Match violation. Furthermore, in contrast to the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), the AUA is surprisingly lenient in their existing guidelines. The Match violations most frequently reported were programs asking applicants illegal and restricted questions as well as inappropriate post-interview communication between applicants and programs. Review of current Match policies and violations suggest several areas for improvement, particularly regarding the specificity of AUA guidelines to define Match violations, the asking of illegal interview questions, and post-interview communication. The obligation to uphold a fair and equitable Match is an ethical imperative for the urologic community.

Active Polysubstance Abuse Concurrent With Surgery as a Possible Newly Identified Infection Risk Factor in Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Based on a Retrospective Analysis of Health and Socioeconomic Factors.

INTRODUCTION: Since the introduction of inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs), risk of infection has decreased. However, concurrent substance abuse has not been investigated in prosthetic urology. AIMS: To determine whether substance abuse would stand out as a relevant risk factor for infection in patients undergoing IPP implantation. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on charts from the past 12 years at our institution, where a single surgeon completed 602 primary IPP surgeries, with only 12 cases (2%) resulting in postoperative infection. Five of these patients (42%) were actively misusing at least one substance at the time of operation (ie, alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, heroin, other illicit substances, and prescription narcotics). Substance abuse was identified in the medical chart by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code or by clear documentation by a provider. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the probability of infection as a function of demographic, physical, and treatment variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression analysis was used to determine statistically significant correlations between risk factors and IPP infection. RESULTS: Polysubstance abuse, poorly controlled blood sugar, and homelessness at the time of procedure positively correlated with postoperative infection. Use of the mummy wrap correlated with decreased infection. CONCLUSION: Active polysubstance abuse, poor glycemic control, and homelessness increase infection risk at IPP implantation. We encourage other implanters to discuss active polysubstance abuse with their patients and to tread cautiously because of the increased risk of infection.

The Malleable Implant Salvage Technique: Infection Outcomes after Mulcahy Salvage Procedure and Replacement of Infected Inflatable Penile Prosthesis with Malleable Prosthesis.

PURPOSE: Since its introduction in 1996 Mulcahy salvage has significantly improved outcomes for the removal and replacement of infected inflatable penile prostheses. Long-term followup data of Mulcahy salvage show an infection-free rate of 82%. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the malleable implant salvage technique was conducted to assess infection outcomes and the feasibility of conversion from malleable device back to inflatable penile prosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, institutional review board exempt, multi-institution study of 58 patients who underwent Mulcahy salvage with inflatable penile prosthesis removal and replacement with malleable prosthesis. Patient operative notes and charts were extensively reviewed to compile study data. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2014 a total of 58 patients underwent infected inflatable penile prosthesis removal and replacement with a malleable prosthesis via Mulcahy salvage. Of these patients 54 (93%) have remained infection-free postoperatively. Average patient age was 56.4 years and average operative time was 148 minutes. Postoperative followup (as of May 2015) ranged from 1 month to 84 months. Of the 54 patients 37 retained the malleable prosthesis and 17 (31%) subsequently underwent replacement with an inflatable penile prosthesis. This occurred on average 6.7 months after Mulcahy salvage. Four patients had persistent infection after Mulcahy salvage with the malleable prosthesis and underwent explantation. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis of Mulcahy salvage procedure and replacement of inflatable penile prosthesis with malleable prosthesis shows a high infection-free rate. Additionally, 17 of the 54 patients who remained infection-free were able to successfully undergo subsequent removal of the malleable prosthesis and replacement with an inflatable penile prosthesis. Further prospective studies are needed to compare salvage with malleable vs inflatable penile prosthesis.

A Multifaceted Intervention to Increase Surgery Resident Engagement in Reporting Adverse Events.

BACKGROUND: Although most residents have been involved in an adverse or near-miss event, they are not likely to report these incidents. To improve the culture of patient safety and to increase adverse event reporting among General Surgery residents, a multifaceted intervention focused on education, feedback, and event resolution was developed and implemented. METHODS: Adverse events involving surgery patients at Boston Medical Center were monitored for 2 months before and for 10 months after implementation of the intervention in May 2014. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the number of adverse events reported by residents, from 0 to 30 per 2-month period (χ(2) = 8.56, p = 0.003). The classification types of reports filed by residents differed significantly from those of incidents submitted by other reporters (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: An intervention focused on addressing barriers to reporting adverse events can significantly increase the volume of incidents reported by surgery residents. Involving residents in patient safety efforts may enhance an institution's ability to identify adverse events and to improve the overall culture of care.