Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 79(2): 245-8, 1992 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1731293

ABSTRACT

Drug abuse during pregnancy in rural populations has received less attention than that in urban populations. Urban studies have reported alarming rates, but it is unknown whether the situation is the same in rural areas. To investigate this, urine samples were collected anonymously from 181 pregnant women who presented to the University of Missouri clinics for care and who resided in communities of less than 25,000. Each urine specimen was tested for cocaine, marijuana, amphetamines, barbiturates, opiates, phencyclidine, benzodiazepines, ethanol, and nicotine. Of the 181 specimens, 83 (46%) contained nicotine, 17 (9.4%) contained marijuana, and one each (0.6%) tested positive for cocaine, barbiturates, ethanol, and benzodiazepines. No other tested substances were detected. Excluding nicotine and ethanol, 20 (11%) of the urine samples tested positive for the screened substances. Review of the prenatal records revealed that 46% of the women reported using tobacco, 15% reported using alcohol, and 8.3% reported illicit drug use during pregnancy. This study indicates that there is a substantial drug abuse problem in rural populations, and that the profile of abuse differs from that of urban populations. Tobacco, ethanol, and marijuana were the most prevalent substances abused during pregnancy, but cocaine was a minor problem. This information may help in directing resources to reduce drug abuse during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Missouri/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/urine , Rural Population , Substance-Related Disorders/urine
2.
J Anal Toxicol ; 16(1): 48-51, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1640698

ABSTRACT

Immunoassay drug testing methods, that have been modified from the manufacturers' recommended procedure to be used for the analysis of federally regulated specimens or other forensic samples require evaluation to ensure their scientific validity. These validation studies must demonstrate the accuracy, precision, and linearity of the modified immunoassay around the cutoff concentration, substantiate adequate rate separation, and verify the ability of the assay to differentiate positive and negative samples. Modification of the EMIT d.a.u. phencyclidine assay in order to achieve the federally mandated cutoff concentration of 25 ng/mL is common. This study describes the validation of a modified EMIT phencyclidine assay and a protocol that allows for the evaluation of similarly modified immunoassays.


Subject(s)
Phencyclidine/urine , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Calibration , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...