Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 32(3): 241-59, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23060411

ABSTRACT

The U.S. Congress [PL 107-188] amended the Safe Drinking Water Act and required each community water system serving more than 3,000 people to conduct vulnerability assessments. These assessments address potential circumstances that could compromise the safety and reliability of municipal water. The present evaluation concerns the concentrations of the blended phosphates (also known as polyphosphates, condensed complex phosphates, polyphosphate glassy balls, and pyrophosphates) intended to aid regulatory agencies in decisions to avoid contact with affected water. Polyphosphates are direct food additives and they are used to treat municipal drinking water, but depending upon the concentration and duration of exposure these substances can induce chemical burns. Ingested polyphosphates are degraded by phosphatase enzymes to monophosphates, substances that are over-the-counter bowel purgatives. High oral doses of the monophosphates can induce transient hyperphosphatemia in older and susceptible young people, which can lead to acute phosphate nephropathy. In some patients, the condition is fatal. Based on the acute diarrhea after the ingestion of a single oral dose of monobasic (NaH2PO(4)) and dibasic (Na2HPO(4)) monophosphates in adults, a do not consume concentration of 600 mg PO(4)/L can be derived. Based on mild local irritation after topical application of 1.0% sodium metaphosphate [(NaPO(3))6 • H2O] to intact skin of sensitive volunteers, a do not use concentration of 8,000 mg PO4/L can be assigned. Given the lack of eye irritation in rabbits after direct instillation of 0.2% (NaPO(3))6 • H2O, an acute ocular contact limit of 50 mg PO4/L serves as the overall do not use level.


Subject(s)
Drinking Water/standards , Irritants/toxicity , Polyphosphates/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Eye/drug effects , Humans , Risk Assessment , Skin/drug effects , Water Purification
2.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 32(3): 275-98, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22893354

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade, regulatory authorities and water purveyors have become increasingly concerned with accidental or intentional adulteration of municipal drinking water. Emergency response guidelines, such as the 'Do Not Consume' or use concentration limits derived herein, can be used to notify the public in such cases. Potassium permanganate (KMnO(4)) is used to control iron concentrations and to reduce the levels of nuisance materials that affect odor or taste of finished drinking water. Manganese (Mn) is recognized an essential nutrient, permanganate (MnO4 (-)) and manganous (Mn(+2)) ions are caustic, and the acute toxicity of KMnO(4) is defined by its oxidant/irritant properties and by the toxicity of Mn. Ingestion of small amounts (4-20 mg/kg) of aqueous KMnO(4) solutions that are above 200 mg/L causes gastrointestinal distress, while bolus ingestion has caused respiratory arrest following coagulative necrosis and hemorrhage in the esophagus, stomach, or liver. Dilute KMnO(4) solutions (1-100 mg/L) are used as a topical antiseptics and astringents, but >1:5000 (200 mg/L) dilutions can irritate or discolor sensitive mucous membranes and direct skin or ocular contact with concentrated KMnO(4) can perforate tissues. Based on clinical experience with 200 mg/L KMnO(4), a Do Not Consume concentration of 7 mg/L KMnO(4) (equivalent to 2 mg Mn/L) is recommended. Recognizing limited empirical data from which to calculate an ocular reference value, a skin contact 'Do Not Use' concentration of 30 mg Mn/L is recommended based on the skin irritation in some patients after a 10-min contact with 100 mg KMnO4/L.


Subject(s)
Drinking Water/standards , Irritants/toxicity , Potassium Permanganate/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Eye/drug effects , Humans , Risk Assessment , Skin/drug effects , Water Purification
3.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 32(3): 260-74, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23111879

ABSTRACT

The U.S. Congress [PL 107-188] amended the Safe Drinking Water Act and required each community water system serving more than 3,000 people to conduct vulnerability assessments. These assessments address potential circumstances that could compromise the safety and reliability of municipal water. Ferric chloride is used in coagulation and flocculation, and it is used to treat raw water with high viral loads, elevated dissolved solids or high bromide. Iron is an essential nutrient, but elevated concentrations of FeCl3 are corrosive as a result of hydrolysis to HCl. Based on a no-observed-adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 0.5% FeCl3 • 6H2O administered in drinking water to male and female F344 rats for up to 2 years, a do not consume concentration of 200 mg FeCl3 /L can be derived. Since instillation of 0.3 M (48.7 g/L) FeCl3 in saline to rodent vagina failed to elicit damage, a topical do not use concentration of 2000 mg FeCl3/L (600 mg Fe/L) can be assigned. The only FeCl3 data available to quantify ocular toxicity involved a pH 1 solution in rabbit eyes, but HCl instillation (pH 2.5) to rabbit eyes found permanent corneal ulceration after 10 min. The pH of FeCl3 in water at the do not use limit (2.4-2.6) is near the pH (2.0) considered corrosive by regulatory agencies. As direct eye contact with water at pH 4.5 or below increases complaints of ocular discomfort, emergency response plans that address FeCl3 in drinking water must account for Fe levels and the pH of the affected water.


Subject(s)
Chlorides/toxicity , Drinking Water/standards , Ferric Compounds/toxicity , Irritants/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Eye/drug effects , Humans , Risk Assessment , Skin/drug effects , Water Purification
4.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J ; 45(11): 767-72, 1984 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6507277

ABSTRACT

Time-weighted average exposures for all solvents present at detectable levels were obtained for eighty-nine solvent-using workers and thirty-six control-group (unexposed) workers in seven plants of three companies applying paints and glues, primarily by spraying. Over twenty solvents were quantified if detected. Concentrations of specific solvents and cumulative fractions of TLVs were measured for various job types. All spray painting and most spray glueing was conducted in operating spray booths. Only low to moderate exposures were observed, with one TWA exceeding the cumulative TLV and three additional TWAs exceeding 50 percent of the cumulative TLV. It may be concluded that solvent TWA exposures in spraying of paints and glues are often well-controlled by common spray booths, and further, that other solvent-use operations including light-duty solvent wiping and manual paint mixing do not frequently produce high exposures (relative to TLV levels) in the presence of ordinary general room ventilation.


Subject(s)
Adhesives , Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Paint , Solvents/analysis , Adhesives/adverse effects , Aerosols , Air Pollutants, Occupational/adverse effects , Humans , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Paint/adverse effects , Solvents/adverse effects , Time Factors , Ventilation
5.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J ; 41(7): 513-22, 1980 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7415973

ABSTRACT

Thermal degradation products of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) food-wrap films were studied under simulated supermarket conditons using a commercial wrapping machine with either a hot wire or a cool rod cutting device. A sampling hood was constructed around the wire/rod to confine and allow collection of thermal degradation products produced. Compounds analyzed and normal concentration ranges found included hydrogen chloride (1-10 micrograms per cut), plasticizer (1-50 micrograms per cut), benzene and toluene (each < 5-20 ng per cut), acrolein (25-150 ng per cut), and carbon monoxide (2-4 micrograms per cut) using the hot wire. Room air samples, collected during hot-wire cutting without the sampling hood, had < 0.25 ppm hydrogen chloride. Using the cool-rod cutting device hydrogen chloride, benzene, and toluene were not detected. Plasticizer was detected (25-86 micrograms per cut) using the cool rod.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Air Pollutants/analysis , Polyvinyl Chloride/analysis , Polyvinyls/analysis , Acrolein/analysis , Benzene/analysis , Carbon Monoxide/analysis , Hydrochloric Acid/analysis , Toluene/analysis
10.
J Water Pollut Control Fed ; 39(9): 1557-67, 1967 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6077644
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...