Ten year experience with the concomitant Maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: The Maze IV (M-IV) procedure is regarded as the golden standard in treatment for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, long-term follow-up results are scarce. We present our institutional 10-year experience. METHODS: We collected data of 117 consecutive patients who have undergone a concomitant M-IV procedure between April 2006 and April 2016. Primary endpoints are freedom of atrial arrhythmias and freedom of atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (40.2%) had paroxysmal AF. Two-thirds of the procedures included mitral valve surgery. The average follow-up time per patient was 3.8 years (SD 2.8). Freedom of AF at 1 year was 79%, at 5 years freedom of AF was 69% and freedom of AF off AAD was 56%. Predictors of AF recurrence in multivariate analysis were age, preoperative pacemakers, redo cardiac surgery and in-hospital AF. Preoperative PVI ablation was found to be a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcomes of the M-IV procedure are good and remain stable over the years. Results could be improved if follow-up were to be intensified and recurrences dealt with aggressively. Key question: How many patients are free from AF in a 10-year period after concomitant M-IV surgical ablation? Key findings: In the long term around 70% of patients are free of AF with an increasing need for anti-arrhythmic drugs. Take home message: Early to midterm freedom from AF after concomitant M-IV procedure is high and remains stable after 3 years.

Medium-term outcome of different surgical methods to cure atrial fibrillation: is less worse?

Different lesion sets and ablation techniques have been performed. We compared these outcomes in search of the best method. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who have undergone AF surgery different from the maze III. The surgical lesion sets were pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone, left atrial maze (LAM) and bi-atrial maze (BAM) and were made with different ablation techniques. During surgery one patient died due to bleeding of a pulmonary vein. The number of patients in the PVI-, LAM-, BAM-groups was 12, 28 and 26, respectively, with freedom from AF at latest follow-up [22.0+/-15.6 (3.1-81.2) months] of 33%, 59% and 60%, respectively. Atrial flutter occurred less in the BAM-group (4%) than in the left-sided procedures (15.4%) (P=0.231). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a higher recurrence of AF for PVI alone (OR 4.42, CL 0.95-20.6, P=0.0583) and a lower recurrence for the 'cut-and-sew' technique (OR 0.13, CL 0.030-0.60, P=0.0084). Left- and bi-atrial maze procedures are equally effective in the suppression of AF, whereas omission of right-sided lesions results in a higher prevalence of atrial flutter. The 'cut-and-sew' technique is superior in terms of freedom from AF compared to bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency.

Freedom from atrial arrhythmias after classic maze III surgery: a 10-year experience.

OBJECTIVES: We studied the persistence of favorable outcome, the occurrence of new atrial arrhythmias, and sinus node dysfunction in patients who underwent the maze III procedure. METHODS: Preoperative, in-hospital, and follow-up data of 203 patients who underwent the maze III procedure between June 1993 and June 2003 were collected. A total of 139 patients underwent the maze procedure for lone atrial fibrillation, and 64 patients underwent the maze procedure and concomitant cardiac surgery. RESULTS: There was no 30-day postoperative mortality. During a mean follow-up of 4.0 +/- 2.6 years, 12 patients (6%) died (2 cardiac related). At the end of follow-up, freedom from supraventricular arrhythmias was 80% for the lone atrial fibrillation group and 64% for the concomitant atrial fibrillation group. Freedom from stroke during follow-up was 100% in the lone atrial fibrillation group and 97% in the concomitant group. Multivariate analysis revealed that rhythm at 1-year follow-up (P < .001; odds ratio 9.56, 95% confidence limits 3.92-23.31) and preoperative left atrium dimension (P = .028; odds ratio 1.06 for every millimeter, 95% confidence limits 1.01-1.12) were predictors of success at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the favorable results of the maze III procedure in terms of freedom from supraventricular arrhythmias persist in most patients for at least 4 years.