Effect of Tocilizumab vs Standard Care on Clinical Worsening in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is threatening billions of people worldwide. Tocilizumab has shown promising results in retrospective studies in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with a good safety profile. Objective: To evaluate the effect of early tocilizumab administration vs standard therapy in preventing clinical worsening in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial that randomized patients hospitalized between March 31 and June 11, 2020, with COVID-19 pneumonia to receive tocilizumab or standard of care in 24 hospitals in Italy. Cases of COVID-19 were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction method with nasopharyngeal swab. Eligibility criteria included COVID-19 pneumonia documented by radiologic imaging, partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (Pao2/Fio2) ratio between 200 and 300 mm Hg, and an inflammatory phenotype defined by fever and elevated C-reactive protein. Interventions: Patients in the experimental arm received intravenous tocilizumab within 8 hours from randomization (8 mg/kg up to a maximum of 800 mg), followed by a second dose after 12 hours. Patients in the control arm received supportive care following the protocols of each clinical center until clinical worsening and then could receive tocilizumab as a rescue therapy. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary composite outcome was defined as entry into the intensive care unit with invasive mechanical ventilation, death from all causes, or clinical aggravation documented by the finding of a Pao2/Fio2 ratio less than 150 mm Hg, whichever came first. Results: A total of 126 patients were randomized (60 to the tocilizumab group; 66 to the control group). The median (interquartile range) age was 60.0 (53.0-72.0) years, and the majority of patients were male (77 of 126, 61.1%). Three patients withdrew from the study, leaving 123 patients available for the intention-to-treat analyses. Seventeen patients of 60 (28.3%) in the tocilizumab arm and 17 of 63 (27.0%) in the standard care group showed clinical worsening within 14 days since randomization (rate ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59-1.86). Two patients in the experimental group and 1 in the control group died before 30 days from randomization, and 6 and 5 patients were intubated in the 2 groups, respectively. The trial was prematurely interrupted after an interim analysis for futility. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and Pao2/Fio2 ratio between 200 and 300 mm Hg who received tocilizumab, no benefit on disease progression was observed compared with standard care. Further blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the results and to evaluate possible applications of tocilizumab in different stages of the disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04346355; EudraCT Identifier: 2020-001386-37.

Long-term results of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin with and without rituximab as salvage treatment for transplant-ineligible patients with refractory/relapsing B-cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin, with and without rituximab, in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma unsuitable for high dose therapy. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled in two subsequent trials, GEMOX [gemcitabine (1200 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8) and oxaliplatin (120 mg/m(2), day 2), three-weekly] and R-GEMOX [rituximab (375 mg/m(2), day 1), gemcitabine (1200 mg/m(2), day 1) and oxaliplatin (120 mg/m(2), day 2), bi-weekly], up to six courses. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled: GEMOX [n = 30; median age, 66 years (range, 46-85); previous chemotherapy > or =2, 70%; PS ECOG > or = 2, 57%]; R-GEMOX [n = 32; median age, 65 years (range 32-79); previous chemotherapy > or =2, 75%; PS ECOG > or = 2, 47%]. Overall and complete response rates were 57 and 30% (95% CI, 15-49) for GEMOX and 78 and 50% (95% CI, 32-68) in R-GEMOX, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 57 and 47% of cycles and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 26 and 17% of courses for GEMOX and R-GEMOX, respectively. At 42 months, the failure-free survival (FFS) was 7% (95% CI, 0-16) for GEMOX and 28% (95% CI, 9-47) for R-GEMOX (P = 0.014), with overall survivals of 7 (95% CI, 0-16) and 37% (95% CI, 20-55), respectively (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Both regimes showed good tolerability and appealing response rates. FFS was more prolonged in R-GEMOX, but patients continuously relapsed without a clear plateau on survival curves.

Mutational status of IgVH genes consistent with antigen-driven selection but not percent of mutations has prognostic impact in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Mutational status of immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region (IgVH) genes, along with CD38 expression, is a prognostic marker in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). Configuration of IgVH genes displaying > 2% mismatch has been shown to correlate with longer survivals. In a series of 64 B-CLLs, we failed to confirm the prognostic value of the IgVH gene mutational status by using the suggested cutoff. However, the IgVH mutational status maintained its prognostic value only when evidence of antigen-driven selection could be documented. This was accomplished by applying statistical methods aimed at evaluating a significant skewing of replacement mutations from framework to complementary determining regions, as it occurs during germinal center differentiation of B cells. These data caution against wide application of the 2% somatic mutation cutoff as a prognostic determinant without demonstration of antigen-driven selection.

Analysis of IgV gene mutations in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia according to antigen-driven selection identifies subgroups with different prognosis and usage of the canonical somatic hypermutation machinery.

Cases of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL) with mutated (M) IgV(H) genes have a better prognosis than unmutated (UM) cases. We analysed the IgV(H) mutational status of B-CLL according to the features of a canonical somatic hypermutation (SHM) process, correlating this data with survival. In a series of 141 B-CLLs, 124 cases were examined for IgV(H) gene per cent mutations and skewing of replacement/silent mutations in the framework/complementarity-determining regions as evidence of antigen-driven selection; this identified three B-CLL subsets: significantly mutated (sM), with evidence of antigen-driven selection, not significantly mutated (nsM) and UM, without such evidence and IgV(H) gene per cent mutations above or below the 2% cut-off. sM B-CLL patients had longer survival within the good prognosis subgroup that had more than 2% mutations of IgV(H) genes. sM, nsM and UM B-CLL were also characterized for the biased usage of IgV(H) families, intraclonal IgV(H) gene diversification, preference of mutations to target-specific nucleotides or hotspots, and for the expression of enzymes involved in SHM (translesion DNA polymerase zeta and eta and activation-induced cytidine deaminase). These findings indicate the activation of a canonical SHM process in nsM and sM B-CLLs and underscore the role of the antigen in defining the specific clinical and biological features of B-CLL.