Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Oncologist ; 25(3): e405-e411, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162805

ABSTRACT

A number of important drugs used to treat cancer-many of which serve as the backbone of modern chemotherapy regimens-have outdated prescribing information in their drug labeling. The Food and Drug Administration is undertaking a pilot project to develop a process and criteria for updating prescribing information for longstanding oncology drugs, based on the breadth of knowledge the cancer community has accumulated with the use of these drugs over time. This article highlights a number of considerations for labeling updates, including selecting priorities for updating; data sources and evidentiary criteria; as well as the risks, challenges, and opportunities for iterative review to ensure prescribing information for oncology drugs remains relevant to current clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Drug Labeling , Drug Prescriptions , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
Oncologist ; 24(10): 1287-1290, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31366725

ABSTRACT

Drawing on discussions at a workshop hosted by the National Cancer Policy Forum, current challenges in pathology are reviewed and practical steps to facilitate high­quality cancer diagnosis and care through improved patient access to expertise in oncologic pathology are highlighted.


Subject(s)
Medical Oncology/methods , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Health Care/standards , Humans
4.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 68(1): 64-89, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29165798

ABSTRACT

Mounting evidence suggests that weight management and physical activity (PA) improve overall health and well being, and reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors. Although many opportunities exist to include weight management and PA in routine cancer care, several barriers remain. This review summarizes key topics addressed in a recent National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine workshop entitled, "Incorporating Weight Management and Physical Activity Throughout the Cancer Care Continuum." Discussions related to body weight and PA among cancer survivors included: 1) current knowledge and gaps related to health outcomes; 2) effective intervention approaches; 3) addressing the needs of diverse populations of cancer survivors; 4) opportunities and challenges of workforce, care coordination, and technologies for program implementation; 5) models of care; and 6) program coverage. While more discoveries are still needed for the provision of optimal weight-management and PA programs for cancer survivors, obesity and inactivity currently jeopardize their overall health and quality of life. Actionable future directions are presented for research; practice and policy changes required to assure the availability of effective, affordable, and feasible weight management; and PA services for all cancer survivors as a part of their routine cancer care. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:64-89. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Neoplasms/therapy , Obesity/therapy , Patient Care/methods , Weight Reduction Programs , Body Weight , Cancer Survivors , Continuity of Patient Care , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Obesity/complications , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
5.
Oncologist ; 19(1): 21-31, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24304712

ABSTRACT

Tobacco use remains a serious and persistent national problem. Recognizing that progress in combating cancer will never be fully achieved without addressing the tobacco problem, the National Cancer Policy Forum of the Institute of Medicine convened a public workshop exploring current issues in tobacco control, tobacco cessation, and implications for cancer patients. Workshop participants discussed potential policy, outreach, and treatment strategies to reduce tobacco-related cancer incidence and mortality, and highlighted a number of potential high-value action items to improve tobacco control policy, research, and advocacy.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Nicotiana/adverse effects , Smoking Cessation/methods , Humans , Incidence , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
6.
J Oncol Pract ; 9(6S): 54s-59s, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29431037

ABSTRACT

The authors summarize presentations and discussion from the Delivering Affordable Cancer Care in the 21st Century workshop and focus on proposed strategies to improve the affordability of cancer care while maintaining or improving the quality of care.

7.
Clin Cancer Res ; 18(22): 6101-9, 2012 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23065428

ABSTRACT

Cancer cells contain multiple genetic changes in cell signaling pathways that drive abnormal cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Unfortunately, patients treated with single agents inhibiting only one of these pathways--even if showing an initial response--often develop resistance with subsequent relapse or progression of their cancer, typically via the activation of an alternative uninhibited pathway. Combination therapies offer the potential for inhibiting multiple targets and pathways simultaneously to more effectively kill cancer cells and prevent or delay the emergence of drug resistance. However, there are many unique challenges to developing combination therapies, including devising and applying appropriate preclinical tests and clinical trial designs, prioritizing which combination therapies to test, avoiding overlapping toxicity of multiple agents, and overcoming legal, cultural, and regulatory barriers that impede collaboration among multiple companies, organizations, and/or institutions. More effective strategies to efficiently develop combination cancer therapies are urgently needed. Thus, the Institute of Medicine's National Cancer Policy Forum recently convened a workshop with the goal of identifying barriers that may be impeding the development of combination investigational cancer therapies, as well as potential solutions to overcome those barriers, improve collaboration, and ultimately accelerate the development of promising combinations of investigational cancer therapies.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Cooperative Behavior , Drug Discovery/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , United States
8.
Oncologist ; 16(12): 1800-5, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22128118

ABSTRACT

The Institute of Medicine's National Cancer Policy Forum recently convened a workshop on patient-centered cancer treatment planning, with the aim of raising awareness about this important but often overlooked aspect of cancer treatment. A primary goal of patient-centered treatment planning is to engage patients and their families in meaningful, thorough interactions with their health care providers to develop an accurate, well-conceived treatment plan, using all available medical information appropriately while also considering the medical, social, and cultural needs and desires of the patient and family. A cancer treatment plan can be shared among the patient, family, and care team in order to facilitate care coordination and provide a roadmap to help patients navigate the path of cancer treatment. There are numerous obstacles to achieving patient-centered cancer treatment planning in practice. Some of these challenges stem from the patient and include patients' lack of assertiveness, health literacy, and numeracy, and their emotional state and concurrent illnesses. Others are a result of physician limitations, such as a lack of time to explain complex information and a lack of tools to facilitate treatment planning, as well as insensitivity to patients' informational, cultural, and emotional needs. Potential solutions to address these obstacles include better training of health care providers and patients in optimal communication and shared decision making, and greater use of support services and tools such as patient navigation and electronic health records. Other options include greater use of quality metrics and reimbursement for the time it takes to develop, discuss, and document a treatment plan.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Planning , Patient-Centered Care , Communication , Health Literacy , Humans , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Physician-Patient Relations , Quality of Health Care , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...