Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 54(8): 1459-63, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25767155

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess drug survival and the reasons for switching anti-TNF-α therapy in SpA patients in a Spanish nationwide study. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed. Sample size was calculated to represent all regions and hospitals throughout the country. Demographic data, patient characteristics and disease activity parameters were obtained. Drug survival and reasons for switching anti-TNF therapy were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 467 SpA patients receiving at least one anti-TNF agent were identified. Among patients who received a first, second and third anti-TNF course, 39.4%, 37.4% and 23.1% discontinued treatment, respectively. The main reasons for switching anti-TNF agents in the first course were lack or loss of efficacy (LOE) and adverse events (AEs) in 40% and 30% of switchers, respectively. Similarly, reasons for switching during the second anti-TNF course were LOE in 48% and AEs in 28% of switchers. Of the 467 SpA patients starting anti-TNF therapy, 28% switched to a second and 8% switched to a third therapy. Mean drug survival for the first, second and third anti-TNF courses were 84.4 (95% CI 78.4, 90.5), 70.2 (95% CI 61.6, 78.9) and 64.8 (95% CI 51.1, 78.5) months, respectively (P = 0.315). CONCLUSION: Twenty-eight per cent of SpA patients starting anti-TNF therapy switched to a second anti-TNF agent. Drug survival did not differ among anti-TNF courses. The main reason for switching anti-TNF therapy was LOE. Switchers were more frequently women and had higher disease activity parameters at the time of the study than non-switchers.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Substitution/statistics & numerical data , Spondylarthropathies/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Spondylarthropathies/diagnosis , Spondylarthropathies/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
2.
Open Access Rheumatol ; 6: 39-47, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27790033

ABSTRACT

Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease (CPPD) is an inflammatory arthritis produced by the deposition of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals in the synovium and periarticular soft tissues. It is the third most common inflammatory arthritis. Diagnosis is suspected on the basis of the clinical picture and radiographic/laboratory findings. The reference standard for the diagnosis of CPPD is based on the identification of CPP crystals in synovial fluid by light microscopy, compensated polarized light microscopy, or phase contrast microscopy. Most treatment approaches for CPPD are based upon clinical experience and not upon controlled trials. They range - depending on the subtype and the characteristics of symptoms - from no treatment to interleukin-1 blockade antibodies or specific therapy for an underlying disease. This review summarizes all we know so far about the diagnosis and management of CPPD.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...