Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 24(1): 301-10, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23079690

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Bone mineral density response to once weekly delayed-release formulation of risedronate, given before or following breakfast, was non-inferior to that seen with traditional immediate-release risedronate given daily before breakfast. Delayed-release risedronate is a convenient dosing regimen for oral bisphosphonate therapy that might avoid poor compliance. INTRODUCTION: This 2-year, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study assessed the efficacy and safety of a delayed-release (DR) 35-mg weekly oral formulation of risedronate that allows subjects to take their weekly risedronate dose before or immediately after breakfast. Results from the first year of the study were published previously (McClung et al. Osteoporos Int 23(1):267-276, 2012); we now report the final results after 2 years. METHODS: Women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive risedronate 5 mg immediate-release (IR) daily (n = 307) at least 30 min before breakfast, or risedronate 35 mg DR weekly, either immediately following breakfast (FB, n = 307) or at least 30 min before breakfast (BB, n = 308). Bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), fractures, adverse events, and bone histomorphometry were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 248 subjects (80.8 %) in the IR daily group, 234 subjects (76.2 %) in the DR FB weekly group, and 240 subjects (77.9 %) in the DR BB weekly group completed the 2-year study. After 2 years of treatment, BMD increases at the lumbar spine and total hip with the weekly DR doses similar to or greater than that with the IR daily dose. Decreases in BTMs were similar or significantly lower in the DR groups. Bone histomorphometry results did not differ among the DR weekly and the IR daily formulations. The three regimens were similarly well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate 35 mg DR weekly is as effective and as well tolerated as risedronate 5 mg IR daily, and will allow subjects to take their weekly risedronate dose immediately after breakfast.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Etidronic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Aged , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Etidronic Acid/administration & dosage , Etidronic Acid/adverse effects , Etidronic Acid/therapeutic use , Female , Femur/physiopathology , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology , Risedronic Acid , Treatment Outcome
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(1): 267-76, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21947137

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Dosing regimens of oral bisphosphonates are inconvenient and contribute to poor compliance. The bone mineral density response to a once weekly delayed-release formulation of risedronate given before or following breakfast was non-inferior to traditional immediate-release risedronate given daily before breakfast. Delayed-release risedronate is a convenient regimen for oral bisphosphonate therapy. INTRODUCTION: We report the results of a randomized, controlled, clinical study assessing the efficacy and safety of a delayed-release (DR) 35 mg weekly oral formulation of risedronate that allows patients to take their weekly risedronate dose before or immediately after breakfast. METHODS: Women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive risedronate 5 mg immediate-release (IR) daily (n = 307) at least 30 min before breakfast, or risedronate 35 mg DR weekly, either at least 30 min before breakfast (BB, n = 308) or immediately following breakfast (FB, n = 307). Bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), fractures, and adverse events were evaluated. The primary efficacy variable was percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at Endpoint. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven subjects (83.7%) in the IR daily group, 252 subjects (82.1%) in the DR FB weekly group, and 258 subjects (83.8%) in the DR BB weekly group completed 1 year. Both DR weekly groups were determined to be non-inferior to the IR daily regimen. Mean percent changes in hip BMD were similar across groups. The magnitude of BTM response was similar across groups; some statistical differences were seen that were small and deemed by investigators to have no major clinical importance. The incidence of adverse events leading to withdrawal and serious adverse events were similar across treatment groups. All three regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate 35 mg DR weekly is similar in efficacy and safety to risedronate 5 mg IR daily, and will allow patients to take their weekly risedronate dose immediately after breakfast.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Etidronic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Aged , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Etidronic Acid/administration & dosage , Etidronic Acid/adverse effects , Etidronic Acid/therapeutic use , Female , Femur/physiopathology , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology , Risedronic Acid , Tablets, Enteric-Coated , Treatment Outcome
3.
Calcif Tissue Int ; 71(2): 103-11, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12085156

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once a week (35 mg and 50 mg) compared with risedronate 5 mg once daily in women with osteoporosis. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 2-year study; the primary efficacy assessment was performed after 1 year. Subjects were women aged 50 years or older who had been postmenopausal for at least 5 years, with either a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of -2.5 or lower (lumbar spine or proximal femur) or a T-score lower than -2 and at least one prevalent vertebral fracture. Subjects received risedronate 5 mg once daily, 35 mg once a week or 50 mg once a week. All subjects also received 1 g daily of elemental calcium supplementation and supplemental vitamin D if the baseline serum levels were low. The primary efficacy measure was percent change in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months. A total of 1,456 women were randomized and received medication; 1,209 (83%) women completed 12 months. The mean percent change (SE) in lumbar spine BMD after 12 months was 4.0% (0.2%) in the 5 mg daily group, 3.9% (0.2%) in the 35 mg group, and 4.2% (0.2%) in the 50 mg group; each once-a-week treatment was determined to be as effective as the daily treatment. Outcomes of the secondary efficacy measurements and safety assessments were also similar in all 3 groups after 12 months. Risedronate 35 mg and 50 mg once a week provide the same efficacy and safety as the daily 5 mg regimen; therefore, the lower dose, 35 mg once a week, is considered optimal for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who desire a once-a-week regimen.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Etidronic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Etidronic Acid/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Aged , Biomarkers/analysis , Bone Density , Bone Resorption/metabolism , Calcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Etidronic Acid/administration & dosage , Female , Femur Neck/drug effects , Femur Neck/metabolism , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/drug effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/metabolism , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/metabolism , Risedronic Acid , Spinal Fractures/prevention & control , Stomach/drug effects , Stomach/pathology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 131(12): 935-42, 1999 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10610644

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Up to 3 years of treatment with alendronate, 5 mg/d, prevents postmenopausal bone loss. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the effect of alendronate is sustained at 4 years of treatment and persists after treatment is discontinued. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: United States and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: 1609 postmenopausal women 45 to 59 years of age. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive oral alendronate, 5 mg/d or 2.5 mg/d; placebo; or open-label estrogen-progestin. Women in the alendronate groups received alendronate for the first 2 years of the study. Treatment was then continued without change or replaced with placebo for the last 2 years of the study. MEASUREMENTS: Annual measurement of bone mineral density. RESULTS: By year 4, the bone mineral density of participants in the placebo group had decreased by 1% to 6% (P < 0.001). Four years of treatment with 5 mg of alendronate per day increased bone mineral density at the spine (mean change [+/-SE], 3.8%+/-0.3%), hip (mean, 2.9%+/-0.2%), and total body (mean, 0.9%+/-0.2%) (P < 0.001 overall). By year 4, bone mineral density at most skeletal sites was greater in participants who switched from alendronate to placebo than in those who continuously received placebo. In years 3 and 4, bone loss in participants who switched from alendronate to placebo was similar to that seen during years 1 and 2 in those who continuously received placebo. Compared with 5 mg of alendronate per day, estrogen-medroxyprogesterone acetate produced similar increases in bone mineral density and estradiol-norethisterone acetate produced increases that were substantially greater. CONCLUSIONS: Four years of treatment with alendronate or estrogen-progestin prevented postmenopausal bone loss. A residual effect was seen 2 years after alendronate therapy was stopped; however, continuous alendronate treatment was more effective in preventing postmenopausal bone loss than 2 years of alendronate followed by 2 years of placebo.


Subject(s)
Alendronate/therapeutic use , Estrogens/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/prevention & control , Progestins/therapeutic use , Alendronate/adverse effects , Bone Density/drug effects , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Estrogens/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Progestins/adverse effects
5.
N Engl J Med ; 338(8): 485-92, 1998 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9443925

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Estrogen-replacement therapy prevents osteoporosis in postmenopausal women by inhibiting bone resorption, but the balance between its long-term risks and benefits remains unclear. Whether other antiresorptive therapies can prevent osteoporosis in these women is also not clear. METHODS: We studied the effect of 2.5 mg or 5 mg of alendronate per day or placebo on bone mineral density in 1174 postmenopausal women under 60 years of age. An additional 435 women who were prepared to receive a combination of estrogen and progestin were randomly assigned to one of the above treatments or open-label estrogen-progestin. The main outcome measure was the change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, hip, distal forearm, and total body measured annually for two years by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The women who received placebo lost bone mineral density at all measured sites, whereas the women treated with 5 mg of alendronate daily had a mean (+/-SE) increase in bone mineral density of 3.5+/-0.2 percent at the lumbar spine, 1.9+/-0.1 percent at the hip, and 0.7+/-0.1 percent for the total body (all P<0.001). Women treated with 2.5 mg of alendronate daily had smaller increases in bone mineral density. Alendronate did not increase bone mineral density of the forearm, but it slowed the loss. The responses to estrogen-progestin were 1 to 2 percentage points greater than those to the 5-mg dose of alendronate. Alendronate was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of placebo or estrogen-progestin. CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women under 60 years of age to nearly the same extent as estrogen-progestin.


Subject(s)
Alendronate/therapeutic use , Bone Density/drug effects , Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)/therapeutic use , Medroxyprogesterone/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/prevention & control , Alendronate/adverse effects , Alendronate/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)/pharmacology , Female , Forearm , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/drug effects , Medroxyprogesterone/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Pelvic Bones/drug effects , Postmenopause , Progesterone Congeners/pharmacology , Progesterone Congeners/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...