ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and the fourth cause of cancer death worldwide. Personalised treatment improves GC outcomes. A molecular classification is needed to choose the appropriate therapy. A classification that uses on-slide biomarkers and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is preferable to comprehensive genomic analysis. In 2016, Setia and colleagues proposed an on-slide classification; however, this is not in widespread use. We propose a modification of this classification that has six subgroups: GC associated with Epstein-Barr virus (GC EBV+), GC with mismatch-repair deficiency (GC dMMR), GC with epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (GC EMT), GC with chromosomal instability (GC CIN), CG that is genomically stable (GC GS) and GC not otherwise specified (GC NOS). This classification also has a provision for biomarkers for current or emerging targeted therapies (Her2, PD-L1 and Claudin18.2). Here, we assess the implementation and feasibility of this inclusive working classification. Materials and Methods: We constructed a tissue microarray library from a cohort of 79 resection cases from FFPE tissue archives. We used a restricted panel of on-slide markers (EBER, MMR, E-cadherin, beta-catenin and p53), defined their interpretation algorithms and assigned each case to a specific molecular subtype. Results: GC EBV(+) cases were 6%, GC dMMR cases were 20%, GC EMT cases were 14%, GC CIN cases were 23%, GC GS cases were 29%, and GC NOS cases were 8%. Conclusions: This working classification uses markers that are widely available in histopathology and are easy to interpret. A diagnostic subgroup is obtained for 92% of the cases. The proportion of cases in each subgroup is in keeping with other published series. Widescale implementation appears feasible. A study using endoscopic biopsies is warranted.
ABSTRACT
Atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel has been introduced for the treatment of locally advanced or recurrent triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patient selection relies on the use of immunohistochemistry using a specific monoclonal PD-L1 antibody (clone SP142) in a tightly controlled companion diagnostic test (CDx) with a defined interpretative algorithm. Currently there are no standardized recommendations for selecting the optimal tissue to be tested and there is limited data to support decision making, raising the possibility that tissue selection may bias test results. We compared PD-L1 SP142 assessment in a collection of 73 TNBC cases with matched core biopsies and excision samples. There was good correlation between PD-L1-positive core biopsy and subsequent excision, but we found considerable discrepancy between PD-L1 negative core biopsy and matched excision, with a third of cases found negative on core biopsies converting to positive upon examination of the excision tissue. In view of these findings, we developed a workflow for the clinical testing of TNBC for PD-L1 and implemented it in a central referral laboratory. We present audit data from the clinical PD-L1 testing relating to 2 years of activities, indicating that implementation of this workflow results in positivity rates in our population of TNBC similar to those of IMpassion130 clinical trial. We also developed an online atlas with a precise numerical annotation to aid pathologists in the interpretation of PD-L1 scoring in TNBC.
