ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Various studies have reported the use of the 95-degree condylar blade plate in the treatment of a subtrochanteric fracture or non-union. However, the holding power of standard screws in the metaphyseal and diaphyseal area is often diminished due to osteopenia. The alternative in this area is the use of locking plates, Schühlis or AO-nuts. With the latter two, non-locking screws in the blade plate can be converted to a fixed angle fixation. The objective of this study was to compare the stiffness and strength of the AO-nut augmented 95-degree condylar blade plate construct with that of a locking plate construct. In addition, a clinical series of eight patients treated with the AO-nut augmented 95-degree condylar blade plate construct is presented. METHODS: Single screw-plate constructs of a 5.0 mm locking screw/locking compression plate (LCP) and a 4.5 mm non-locking screw/4.5 mm dynamic compression plate (DCP), converted to a fixed-angle screw construct using AO-nuts, were tested by cantilever bending. During loading, force and displacement were recorded, from which the bending stiffness (N/mm) and the yield strength (N) were determined. Secondarily, all patients that underwent surgical treatment for subtrochanteric fracture, malunion or non-union by the senior author using this technique, underwent chart review. RESULTS: The stiffness of the locking screws was about four times higher compared to the AO-nut augmented construct. The yield strength was 2.3 times higher for the locking screw construct. In none of the eight patients treated with the fixed-angle blade plate, failure of the AO-nut augmented construct occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Although the stiffness and strength of the AO-nut augmented construct is less than of the locking screw, excellent clinical outcomes can be achieved utilizing this construct.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the available literature on surgical treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy and to provide an overview of the different surgical techniques. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature available in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database of controlled trials was performed. The primary outcome measure in terms of patient satisfaction and the secondary outcome measures that consisted of complication rate, pain score, functional outcome score and success rate were evaluated. The Downs & Black checklist and the Coleman methodology scale were used to assess the methodological quality of included articles. RESULTS: Of 1090 reviewed articles, 23 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported on the results of 1285 procedures in 1177 patients. The surgical techniques were divided into five categories. Eleven studies evaluated open surgical debridement, seven studies described minimally invasive procedures, three studies evaluated endoscopic procedures, one study evaluated open gastrocnemius lengthening, and one study reported on open autologous tendon transfer. Results regarding patient satisfaction (69-100 %) and complication rate (0-85.7 %) varied widely. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the large variation in surgical techniques available for treatment of midportion Achilles tendinopathy. None of the included studies compared surgical intervention with nonsurgical or placebo intervention. Minimally invasive and endoscopic procedures yield lower complication rates with similar patient satisfaction in comparison with open procedures. Minimally invasive and endoscopic procedures might therefore prove to be the future of surgical treatment of Achilles midportion tendinopathy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
