Post-diuretic spot urine sodium assessment in acute heart failure: a retrospective analysis.

AIMS: To provide real-world data on post-diuretic spot urine sodium concentration (UNa) assessment in acute heart failure (AHF) and its implications for treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Automated query of the electronic medical record identified patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit of a single tertiary care hospital between November 2018 and December 2021, who received intravenous loop diuretics. Detailed manual chart review confirmed the AHF diagnosis. Stratification was performed based on whether post-diuretic UNa was assessed within 24 h of admission. AHF was confirmed in 340/380 identified patients. Post-diuretic UNa was assessed in 117 (34%), more frequently when ejection fraction was reduced and heart failure more advanced. Patients with versus without post-diuretic UNa assessment received higher doses of intravenous loop diuretics and more frequently acetazolamide and thiazide-like diuretics (p < 0.001 for all), resulting in similar urine output despite more advanced heart failure [2,488 mL (1,740-4,033 mL) vs. 2,400 mL (1,553-3,250 mL), respectively; p = 0.170]. Diuretic therapy remained more intense at discharge in the post-diuretic UNa group, with also a higher prescription rate of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitors (p = 0.021). Serum creatinine increases/decreases were similarly frequent irrespectively from UNa assessment, with more dynamic changes observed in patients with UNa ≤ 80 mmol/L versus ≥ 81 mmol/L. After adjustments for baseline characteristics, the risk for death or heart failure readmission was similar in patients with versus without UNa assessment [HR (95%CI) = 1.43 (0.88-2.32); p = 0.150]. CONCLUSION: Post-diuretic UNa assessment in AHF was associated with more intense diuretic regimens, preserving urine output despite its use in a sicker population.

Heparin dosing in patients with Impella-supported cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: Impella™ is increasingly used in cardiogenic shock. However, thromboembolic and bleeding events are frequent during percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS). OBJECTIVE: Therefore, we aimed to explore the optimal anticoagulation regime for pMCS to prevent thromboembolism and bleedings. METHODS: This hypothesis-generating multi-center cohort study investigated 170 patients with left-Impella™ support. We (A) compared bleeding/thrombotic events in two centers with therapeutic range (TR-aPTT) activated partial thromboplastin time (60-80s) and (B) compared events of these centers with one center with intermediate range aPTT (40-60s). RESULTS: After matching, there were no differences in patients' characteristics. In centers aiming at TR-aPTT, major bleeding was numerically lower with aPTT <60s within 48 h of left-Impella™ support, versus patients that achieved the aimed aPTT of ≥60s [aPTT ≥60s: 22 (37.3%) vs. aPTT<60s 14 (23.7%); Hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 (95%) CI, 0.28-1.38; p = 0.234]. Major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCE) did not differ between groups. In comparison of centers, TR-aPTT strategy showed higher major bleeding rates [TR: 8 (47.1%) vs. intermediate range: 1 (5.9%); HR, 0.06 (95%) CI, 0.01-0.45; p = 0.006]. MACCE were lower in the intermediate range aPTT group as well [TR 12 (70.6%) vs. intermediate range 5 (29.4%) HR, 0.32 (95%) CI, 0.11-0.92; p = 0.034]. CONCLUSION: This pilot analysis showed that lowering UFH-targets in left-Impella™ supported CS patients seems to be a safe and promising strategy for reducing major bleedings without increasing MACCE. This needs to be validated in larger, randomized clinical trials.

Short-term percutaneous mechanical circulatory support: no promise without positioning!

Short-term percutaneous mechanical circulatory support by a micro-axial flow pump is increasingly used to support the left ventricle in cardiogenic shock. After a correct indication and placement, appropriate device management in the cardiac intensive care unit is vital to ensure optimal pump function and adequate haemodynamic support. A key element hereby is a correct percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD) position. This review explains how an optimal left-sided pVAD position can be achieved and maintained, focusing on the correct insertion depth and rotational angle. Useful imaging techniques, placement and replacement manoeuvres, and monitoring options through the console are discussed. The frequently encountered problem of mal-rotation towards the mitral valve, which may cause suction alarms, haemolysis, aortic regurgitation, and inadequate haemodynamic support, is explained. Finally, a practical bedside approach to assess pVAD position and discern suction alarms due to mal-positioning from haemodynamic problems is proposed.

Veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation in a COVID-19 patient with cold-agglutinin haemolytic anaemia: A case report.

OVERVIEW: The use of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy to treat severe COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure is increasing worldwide. We reported herein the use of veno-venous ECMO in a patient with cold agglutinin haemolytic anaemia (CAHA) who suffered from severe COVID-19 infection. DESCRIPTION: A 64-year-old man presented to the emergency department (ED) with incremental complaints of dyspnoea and cough since one week. His history consisted of CAHA, which responded well to corticosteroid treatment. Because of severe hypoxemia, urgent intubation and mechanical ventilation were necessary. Despite deep sedation, muscle paralysis and prone ventilation, P/F ratio remained low. Though his history of CAHA, he still was considered for VV-ECMO. As lab results pointed to recurrence of CAHA, corticosteroids and rituximab were started. The VV-ECMO run was short and rather uncomplicated. Although, despite treatment, CAHA persisted and caused important complications of intestinal ischemia, which needed multiple surgical interventions. Finally, the patient suffered from progressive liver failure, thought to be secondary to ischemic cholangitis. One month after admission, therapy was stopped and patient passed away. CONCLUSION: Our case report shows that CAHA is no contraindication for VV-ECMO, even when both titre and thermal amplitude are high. Although, the aetiology of CAHA and its response to therapy will determine the final outcome of those patients.

Hemadsorption: A New Therapeutic Option for Selected Cases of Bromazepam Intoxication.

Benzodiazepine ingestion is frequent in patients admitted to ICU for intoxications. Generally, a supportive approach by securing the airway, breathing, and circulation is sufficient. Flumazenil is a well-known antidote for benzodiazepines but does not influence its elimination. Following preclinical data, we applied for the first time in humans a hemadsorption filter in a patient with a bromazepam intoxication. This technique proved to be effective in eliminating bromazepam in a patient with CHILD-C cirrhosis. We conclude that hemadsorption is a viable option to reduce length of ICU stay or intubation in slow metabolizers without contraindications.

Hemolysis during short-term mechanical circulatory support: from pathophysiology to diagnosis and treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in heart failure therapies and percutaneous coronary interventions, survival for cardiogenic shock remains poor. Percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVAD) are increasingly used, but current evidence remains conflicting. The Impella is an example of such a device, based on a catheter mounted micro-axial continuous flow pump, that has been rapidly adopted in routine practice. An important aspect of postimplantation care is the prevention of complications. Hemolysis is one of the most frequent complications seen with this device. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of hemolysis in patients supported with a pVAD. A practical algorithm for rapid identification of hemolysis and the underlying cause is presented, allowing for early treatment and prevention of further complications. EXPERT OPINION: Hemolysis remains a threat to patients supported with any mechanical circulatory support device. Prevention as well as treatment demands for sufficient knowledge about the device, the optimal position, and hemodynamics. Future studies should try to clarify some of the elements that are still unclear, such as optimal anticoagulation, the location of pentoxifylline, or extracorporeal removal of free hemoglobin. This could help to optimize outcomes in clinical practice as well as future studies.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Discharged after COVID-19 Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication of COVID-19, so that the importance of adequate in-hospital thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is well established. However, the incidence of VTE after discharge and whether postdischarge thromboprophylaxis is beneficial and safe are unclear. In this prospective observational single-center study, we report the incidence of VTE 6 weeks after hospitalization and the use of postdischarge thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 were invited to a multidisciplinary follow-up clinic 6 weeks after discharge. D-dimer and C-reactive protein were measured, and all patients were screened for deep vein thrombosis with venous duplex-ultrasound. Additionally, selected high-risk patients received computed tomography pulmonary angiogram or ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan to screen for incidental pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: Of 485 consecutive patients hospitalized from March through June 2020, 146 patients were analyzed, of which 39% had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Postdischarge thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in 28% of patients, but was used more frequently after ICU stay (61%) and in patients with higher maximal D-dimer and C-reactive protein levels during hospitalization. Six weeks after discharge, elevated D-dimer values were present in 32% of ward and 42% of ICU patients. Only one asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (0.7%) and one symptomatic pulmonary embolism (0.7%) were diagnosed with systematic screening. No bleedings were reported. CONCLUSION: In patients who had been hospitalized with COVID-19, systematic screening for VTE 6 weeks after discharge revealed a low incidence of VTE. A strategy of selectively providing postdischarge thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients seems safe and potentially effective.

Managing Patients With Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

The use of mechanical circulatory support for patients presenting with cardiogenic shock is rapidly increasing. Currently, there is only limited and conflicting evidence available regarding the role of the Impella (a microaxial, continuous-flow, short-term, left or right ventricular assist device) in cardiogenic shock; further randomized trials are needed. Patient selection, timing of implantation, and post-implantation management in the cardiac intensive care unit are crucial elements for success. Particular challenges at the bedside include the practical management of anticoagulation, evaluation of correct device position, and the approach to use in a patient with signs of insufficient hemodynamic support. Profound knowledge of these issues is required to enable the maximal potential of the device. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the short-term assist device and describes a practical approach to optimize care for patients supported with the device.

Left Impella®-device as bridge from cardiogenic shock with acute, severe mitral regurgitation to MitraClip®-procedure: a new option for critically ill patients.

AIMS: Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) related to acute, severe mitral regurgitation (MR) are often considered too ill for immediate surgical intervention. Therefore, other less invasive techniques for haemodynamic stabilization should be explored. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate the feasibility and outcomes in patients with CS due to severe MR by using a novel approach combining haemodynamic stabilization with left Impella-support plus MR-reduction using MitraClip®. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed whether a combined left Impella®/MitraClip®-procedure in a rare population of CS-patients with acute MR requiring mechanical ventilation is a feasible strategy to recovery in patients who had been declined cardiac surgery. Six INTERMACS-1 CS-patients with acute MR were studied at two tertiary cardiac intensive care units. The mean EURO-II score was 39 ± 19% and age 66.8 ± 4.9 years. All patients had an initial pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >20 mmHg and pulmonary oedema necessitating invasive ventilation. Cardiac output was severely impaired (left ventricular outflow tract velocity time index 9.8 ± 1.8 cm), requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS) (Impella®-CP; mean flow 2.9 ± 1.8 L per minute; mean support 9.7 ± 6.0 days). Despite MCS-guided unloading, weaning from ventilation failed due to persisting pulmonary oedema necessitating MR-reduction. In all cases, the severe MR was reduced to mild using percutaneous MitraClip®-procedure, followed by successful weaning from invasive ventilation. Survival to discharge was 86%, with all surviving and rare readmission for heart failure at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: A combined Impella®/MitraClip®-strategy appears a novel, feasible alternative for weaning CS-patients presenting with acute, severe MR. Upfront Impella®-stabilization facilitates safe bridging to Mitraclip®-procedure and the staged approach facilitates successful weaning from ventilatory support.

Pulsus Alternans as a Sign of Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Temporary left ventricular assist devices such as the ImpellaTM are increasingly used in patients with cardiogenic shock. The right ventricle remains the Achilles heel of left ventricular assist device-supported circulation. However, right ventricular failure after implantation of a left ventricular assist device remains incompletely defined and understood. We describe the first case of pulsus paradoxus emerging after the initiation of circulatory support using a left ventricular ImpellaTM device, which is an early sign of right ventricular failure, that was completely abolished after the addition of a temporary right ventricular assist device.