"It Just Depends on Their Stability": A Qualitative Examination of Patient Factors Influencing Providers' Contraceptive Counseling Approaches for Persons With Substance Use Disorders.

OBJECTIVES: This qualitative study examined how patient-related factors influence providers' contraceptive counseling for persons with substance use disorders (SUDs). Specifically, we explored individual behavior and social factors that contribute to providers modifying their contraceptive counseling approaches and described how providers alter their counseling recommendations and communication strategies in the presence of such factors. METHODS: In 2019, we purposively recruited a national sample of contraceptive providers (N = 24) and conducted semistructured phone interviews to inquire about their contraceptive counseling practices for women with SUDs. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis with inductive codes. RESULTS: Participants included 10 medical doctors, 8 nurse practitioners, and 6 certified nurse-midwives. We found that providers modify their contraceptive counseling provision when their patients are actively using substances or have unstable living conditions, such as intimate partner violence or homelessness. With patients experiencing these instabilities, providers reported postponing contraceptive discussions until patients are stabilized in treatment, recommending long-active reversible contraceptive methods, and varying communication styles according to their own perceptions of patients' communication needs. Providers perceived that individuals in long-term recovery have increased stability and fewer barriers to contraceptive access and adherence and therefore reported increased willingness to provide greater autonomy during contraceptive decision making and shift the counseling focus to short-acting contraceptive methods. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that substance use and social "stability" of patients contributes to how providers approach their contraceptive counseling and make methods recommendations for their patients with SUDs. More research is needed to understand strategies that individuals with SUDs use to overcome barriers to contraceptive access and adherence in the context of active substance use and social instability.

Provider Perspectives of Barriers to Contraceptive Access and Use among Women with Substance Use Disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies conducted from the patient perspective indicate that women with substance use disorders (SUDs) experience extensive barriers to contraceptive access and use (CAU), but there is limited research investigating this topic from the provider perspective. We explored provider perspectives on the barriers to CAU for women with SUDs. As a secondary objective, we highlighted provider contraceptive counseling strategies to address patient CAU barriers. METHODS: We conducted 24 qualitative interviews with a purposeful sample of women's health providers, including medical doctors, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse-midwives. We used thematic analysis to code the interviews with inductive codes and organized findings according to levels of influence within the Dahlgren and Whitehead rainbow model, a socioecological model of health. RESULTS: Provider-reported barriers to CAU were identified at four levels of socioecological influence and included reproductive misconceptions; active substance use; trauma, interpersonal violence, and reproductive coercion; limited social support; lack of housing, employment, health insurance, and transportation; stigma; discrimination; and punitive prenatal substance use policies and child welfare reporting requirements. Strategies for addressing CAU barriers mainly focused on patient-centered communication, including open information exchange, shared decision-making, and relationship building. However, providers described disproportionately highlighting the benefits of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and directing conversations toward LARC when they perceived that such methods would help patients to overcome adherence and other challenges related to active substance use or logistical barriers. Notably, there was no mention of CAU facilitators during the interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Providers perceived that women with SUDs experience a range of CAU barriers, which they addressed within the clinical setting through use of both patient-centered communication and highlighting the benefits of LARC when they perceived that such methods would help clients to overcome barriers. Improving CAU for women with SUDs will require multidisciplinary, multipronged strategies that prioritize reproductive autonomy and are implemented across clinical, community, and policy settings.