To drain or not to drain extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Anastomotic leakage is the one of the most serious complications in rectal cancer surgery and is associated with high mortality, morbidity and an increased incidence of local recurrence. Although many studies have compared drained and undrained colorectal anastomoses, to date the role of pelvic drainage in extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis remains undefined. METHOD: We carried out a systematic review of the literature, performing an unrestricted search in MEDLINE and Embase up to 30 October 2012. Reference lists of retrieved articles and review articles were manually searched for other relevant studies. We performed a meta-analysis of the data currently available on the incidence of extraperitoneal anastomotic leakage, according to the presence or absence of pelvic drainage. RESULTS: Overall, eight studies - three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and five non-RCTs, comprising a total of 2277 patients - were included in the meta-analysis. Pelvic drainage was demonstrated to reduce both the leak rate and the rate of reintervention in patients who underwent anterior rectal resection with extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.73; and OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18-0.46, respectively) compared with patients without drainage. Overall mortality and infection rates were also evaluated, but a nonsignificant correlation was found with the presence of drainage. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis shows that the presence of a pelvic drain reduces the incidence of extraperitoneal colorectal anastomotic leakage and the rate of reintervention after anterior rectal resection.

Temporary percutaneous ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in mechanical extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: a retrospective study.

AIM: Loop ileostomy is a suitable procedure for transitory faecal diversion after low colorectal anastomosis, but it causes relevant morbidities (discomfort, peristomal infections, dehydration) and requires a second operation to be closed. We already described an alternative technique of temporary percutaneous ileostomy (TPI) that can be removed without surgery. METHOD: The data of 143 consecutive patients, undergoing elective laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum for adenocarcinoma and low mechanical colorectal anastomosis, 68 with conventional loop ileostomy (CLI) and 75 with TPI, were analyzed. RESULTS: Neither intra-operative complications nor deaths occurred during the follow-up period. Clinical anastomotic leakage occurred in 4 patients with CLI and in 1 with TPI (p = 0.191). The median time required for the emission of gases and faeces through the stoma was respectively 1 and 2.5 days in the CLI group, and 1 and 2 days in the TPI group (p = 0.259 and p = 0.126). The median post-operative stay was 8 days in the CLI group and 11 days in the TPI group (p < 0.001). PTIs were removed on the median of 9 days after surgery without major complications, whereas the CLIs were re-canalized in 79.4% of patients on an average of 106 days, with 2 major complications. CONCLUSION: The temporary percutaneous ileostomy seems to be a valid alternative to conventional ileostomy, ensuring optimal faecal diversion and less patient discomfort. It can be easily removed without surgery, allowing patients a better outcome.

Right colonic diverticulitis: an uncommon disease in western countries.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Right colonic diverticulitis is not a frequent disease and its management is still controversial. In this study we describe our experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients operated on because of a right colonic diverticulitis in our surgical unit. All patients were treated laparoscopically. Demographics, diagnostic and surgical results were recorded. RESULTS: Between January 1994 and January 2007, 11 patients (7 males and 4 females) mean age 53 +/- 9 years (range 39-68), ASA 1: 6 patients, ASA 2: 4 patients, ASA 3: one patient, and BMI 27.8 (range 25-31), had right colonic diverticulitis. Four patients underwent emergency operations: one for peritonitis and three with an erroneous diagnosis of acute appendicitis; seven were operated on electively. There were no deaths or complications. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.6 days (range, 3-9). After a mean follow-up of 6.3 years (range 1-13) all patients of this series are symptom-free. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: Right colon diverticulitis diagnosis remains difficult. A pre-operative imaging screening is necessary to successfully face this challenging disease. Laparoscopy is a safe and effective method to treat these patients. Colectomy should be considered a good therapeutic option for right colonic diverticulitis, although a conservative approach could be proposed in selected cases.

Elective versus urgent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

AIM: Urgent appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis (AA) complicated by abscess or phlegmon is associated with a high rate of complications. Recent developments in CT scanning have allowed patients with complicated appendicitis to be better identified. We choose to treat these patients with initial antibiotic therapy followed by elective appendectomy. We reported the results of this strategy and compared it with urgent appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with complicated acute appendicitis (CAA) between 1998 and 2007 treated either by urgent appendectomy or with antibiotic therapy and elective appendectomy was performed. We assessed the efficacy of antibiotic therapy for CAA. We compared the postoperative course between urgent and elective appendectomy. RESULTS: We treated 56 patients with CAA: 40 by urgent appendectomy and 16 by antibiotics. All 16 patients improved with no need for urgent surgery, with 15 undergoing elective appendectomy. Postoperative complications were significantly lower in the elective group. Conversion rate and mean operative time were also lower but not significantly different. However, the duration of total hospital stay, antibiotic therapy and sick leave were higher. CONCLUSIONS: Initial antibiotic therapy followed by elective appendectomy may be proposed in patients diagnosed with CAA.