Antibiotic administration after cholecystectomy for acute mild-moderate cholecystitis: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute cholecystitis is a common disease and a frequent cause of emergency admission to surgical wards. Evidence regarding antibiotic administration in urgent procedures is limited and remains a contentious issue. According to the Tokyo guidelines, the antibiotic administration should be guided by the severity of cholecystitis, but internationally accepted guidelines are lacking. In particular, the need to perform antibiotic therapy after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is controversial for mild and moderate acute calculous cholecystitis (Tokio I and II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive computer literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE databases in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. We selected patients treated with cholecystectomy for mild or moderate acute calculous cholecystitis (Tokio I or II), only randomized controlled trials, (post-operative antibiotic administration versus placebo or untreated), data about local or systemic infection rate in the next 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-nine articles were identified, and three articles were considered eligible for the meta-analysis, including 676 patients. Overall surgical site infections were documented in 18 (5.49%) of 328 patients treated with post-operative antibiotics versus 25 (7.18%) of 348 patients treated without post-operative antibiotics. Overall results and the subgroup analysis (superficial and deep incisional infection and organ/space infection) showed no statistically significant reduction of surgical site infections rate under antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis shows no significant benefit of extended antibiotic therapy in reducing SSI after cholecystectomy for mild and moderate acute cholecystitis (Tokio I and II). Further RCTs with adequate statistical power and involving a higher number of patients with subgroups are needed to better evaluate the benefit of post-operative antibiotic treatment in reducing the rate of organ/space surgical site infections.

Medullary-like hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary hepatic cancer. Pathological features can define the biological behavior and prognosis. Medullary-like HCC is a very rare variant that has been described only twice in literature. In the present study, we report the case of a non-cirrhotic 72-year-old man, who presented two HCC lesions on routine screening for hepatitis C virus liver disease. Radiological imaging and biopsy showed two different subtypes: one classic HCC, which was treated with chemoembolization, and a second PET/CT-positive carcinoma with a PET/CT-positive metastatic coeliac lymph node, which was resected laparoscopically with a left lateral sectionectomy and extended lymphadenectomy. Histopathology revealed a medullary-like HCC; lymph node analysis confirmed the metastatic nature of the PET/CT-positive coeliac node and showed an incidental B-cell lymphoma in the hepatic pedicle lymph nodes. To the best of our knowledge this is the third case of medullary-like HCC described in the literature, and the first associated to a concomitant typical HCC.

Purse-string closure versus conventional primary closure of wound following stoma reversal: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications after stoma closure and the optimal skin closure technique is still not clear. The goal of this review was to compare outcomes with purse-string closure technique (PSC) versus conventional closure technique (CCT) for skin closure after stoma reversal. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare SSI rate within 30 days, operative time, hospital stay, incisional hernia and intestinal obstruction rates between PSC and CCT. RESULTS: The pooled analysis of 5 studies showed a statically significant lower rate of SSI in favor of PSC compared to CCT (OR -0.24; 95% CI -0.32, - 0.15; p < 0.00001). No statistically significant differences were observed in the operative time (OR -0.05; 95% CI -3.95, 3.84; p = 0.98) and in the length of hospital stay (OR -0.20; 95% CI -0.76, 0.36; p = 0.48), between the two techniques. Additionally, two out of the five studies provided data on incisional hernia and intestinal obstruction and the pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between PSC and CCT techniques: incisional hernia (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.27-2.47; p = 0.71) and intestinal obstruction (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.41-2.84; p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of 5 RCTs showed that SSI rate is statistically significant lower when PSC is performed, compared to CCT. Whereas, no significant differences were found between the two techniques with regards to operative time, length of hospital stay, incisional hernia and intestinal obstruction rates.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A case report.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality and is associated with a poor overall survival even when diagnosed early and considered resectable. Complete surgical removal with negative histological margins is an independent predictor of survival and remains the only potential curative treatment. In borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BRPAC), preoperative systemic therapy may increase resectability and margin-negative resection rate. There is no current consensus on the optimal chemotherapy regimen for BRPAC. The present case describes a patient with BRPAC who achieved a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin), but early relapse following a pancreaticoduodenectomy without vascular resection, with an uneventful postoperative course, except for a pulmonary embolism.

Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A retrospective multicenter comparison between early and long-term post-operative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are the most commonly performed procedures for morbid obesity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing LRYGB or LSG between August 2000 and November 2014. RESULTS: Data from 581 (280 LSG and 301 LRYGB) were gathered. Operating time (77.6 vs 250.5 min; p < 0.001), post-operative complication rate (3.9% vs 11.6%; p < 0.001), overall occlusions (p = 0.004), need for re-intervention (p < 0.001), hospital stay (5.7 vs 9.2 days; p < 0.001) and mean 1-year EWL (49% vs 61%; p = 0.001) resulted statistically significant lower in LSGs compared with LRYGBs. Not statistically significant differences were found about leakage, bleeding requiring transfusion, infections, short-term mortality and mean 2- and 3-years EWL. Upon univariate analysis, basal weight, basal BMI, age and gender were not associated with the rate of re-intervention and with the combination of re-intervention or death. CONCLUSIONS: LRYGB resulted associated with higher post-operative morbidity rate and increased 1-year EWL than LSG. Prospective studies are needed to assess the impact of these two surgical procedures on the long-term weigh loss.

Intra-abdominal drainage after pancreatic resection: is it really necessary? A meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is the most dreadful complication of patients after pancreatic resection. The use of operative site drains is considered routine all along in pancreatic surgery in order to remove any collections and to act as a warning of hemorrhage or anastomotic leakage. To date few studies investigated the potential benefit and safety of routine drainage compared with no drainage after pancreatic resection and the evidence by literature is not clear. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out performing an unrestricted search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library up to 28th February 2014. Reference lists of retrieved articles and review articles were manually searched for other relevant studies. The currently available data regarding the incidence of post-operative short-term outcomes after pancreatic resection were meta-analyzed according to the presence or absence of the intra-abdominal drainage. RESULTS: Overall 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis, that is 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 non-RCTs resulting in 2704 patients totally. Intra-abdominal drainage showed to increase the PF (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.52-3.51), the total post-operative complications (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30-1.78) and the re-admission (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.61) rates. A non-significant correlation was found with the presence/absence of the drainage about biliary and enteric fistula, post-operative hemorrhage, intra-abdominal infected collection, wound infection and overall mortality rates. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis shows that the presence of an intra-abdominal drainage does not improve the post-operative outcome after pancreatic resection.