Preferences of Individuals With Cancer for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

PURPOSE: Symptom monitoring and management using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures improves outcomes for individuals with cancer. The purpose of the current study was to provide a qualitative assessment of preferences of individuals with cancer for PRO measures. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING: 15 patients receiving systemic therapy at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Participants completed three PRO measures. Qualitative interviews were conducted, and content analysis was used to identify relevant themes. FINDINGS: Identified themes were the importance of communicating various aspects of the disease and treatment experience to the oncology team, the importance of systematic PRO assessments, congruence among PRO questionnaires and questions clinicians ask at clinic visits, concerns about the length of PRO questionnaires, the importance of the response options available in PRO questionnaires, and willingness to complete PRO measures frequently. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses are critical facilitators of the systematic use of PRO measures across the cancer care continuum.

The Treatment-induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale (TNAS): a psychometric update following qualitative enrichment.

BACKGROUND: The validation of the Treatment-induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale (TNAS v2.0), a patient-reported outcome measure of symptoms associated with cancer treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN), was previously reported. Further patient input (qualitative interviewing, cognitive debriefing) suggested that the measure should be modified to better reflect the TIPN experience. We report the performance of a revised version (TNAS v3.0) for assessing TIPN across cancer treatments. This TNAS version incorporates extensive patient input, in accordance with FDA guidance on the development of patient-reported outcomes measures. Patients with multiple myeloma, colorectal cancer, or gynecological cancer treated with bortezomib, oxaliplatin, or taxane-platinum combination therapy, respectively, completed the TNAS v3.0, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (EORTC-CIPN20), and a cognitive debriefing survey during a scheduled clinic visit. Patients also participated in in-depth qualitative interviews about their TIPN symptoms. The psychometric properties of the TNAS v3.0 were evaluated. RESULTS: Cognitive debriefing survey results were summarized and showed that most patients found the items easy to complete, comprehensible, acceptable, and not redundant. A notable change from TNAS v2.0 was the separation of "numbness" from "tingling," although these 2 items remained the most severe, followed by a new "pain" item. The Cronbach coefficient alphas for the 9-item TNAS were 0.88 and 0.90 at the first and second administrations, respectively, indicating good reliability. The test-retest reliability of the TNAS was 0.97. The correlation coefficients for the 9-item TNAS and the EORTC-CIPN20 were 0.69 for the sensory subscale, 0.70 for the motor subscale, and 0.32 for the autonomic subscale, indicating good validity. CONCLUSION: This psychometric evaluation showed that the TNAS v3.0 is valid and reliable. Further research is needed to determine clinically meaningful differences in TNAS v3.0 scores and demonstrate its responsiveness over time.

Assessment of baseline symptom burden in treatment-naïve patients with lung cancer: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer who have not yet begun treatment may already be experiencing major symptoms produced by their disease. Understanding the symptomatic effects of cancer treatment requires knowledge of pretreatment symptoms (both severity and interference with daily activities). We assessed pretreatment symptom severity, interference, and quality of life (QOL) in treatment-naïve patients with lung cancer and report factors that correlated with symptom severity. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data collected at initial intake. Symptoms/interference were rated on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) between 30 days prediagnosis and 45 days postdiagnosis. We examined symptom severity by disease stage and differences in severity by histology. Linear regression analyses identified significant predictors of severe pain and dyspnea. RESULTS: Of 460 eligible patients, 256 (62%) had adenocarcinoma, 30 (7%) had small cell carcinoma, and 100 (24%) had squamous cell carcinoma; > 30% reported moderate-to-severe (rated ≥ 5, 0-10 scale) pretreatment symptoms. The most-severe were fatigue, disturbed sleep, distress, pain, dyspnea, sadness, and drowsiness. Symptoms affected work, enjoyment of life, and general activity (interference) and physical well-being (QOL) the most. Patients with advanced disease (n = 289, 63%) had more-severe symptoms. Cancer stage was associated with pain severity; both histology and cancer stage were associated with severe dyspnea. CONCLUSION: One third of lung cancer patients were symptomatic at initial presentation. Quantification of pretreatment symptom burden can inform patient-specific palliative therapy and differentiate disease-related symptoms from treatment-related toxicities. Poorly controlled symptoms could negatively affect treatment adherence and therapeutic outcomes.

Occurrence of putative virulence-related genes, aatA, aggR and aaiC, of Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) among adults with travelers' diarrhea acquired in Guatemala and Mexico.

Enteroaggregative E. coli strains are important causes of diarrhea worldwide and are the second most important bacterial cause of travelers' diarrhea (TD). Pathogenicity of EAEC is not completely understood. We investigated the occurrence of putative virulence related genes (VRG), aatA, aggR and aaiC, in a nested case-control study of a cohort of US travelers >18 years of age, visited either Guatemala or Mexico. Fecal samples were collected between 2008 and 2012 from patients with TD from whom a HEp-2 cell adherent EAEC strain was identified (Cases) and from healthy subjects in the same locale without diarrhea from whom enteric pathogens were not isolated (Controls). Thirty-one subjects with acquired TD at destination was compared with 32 healthy controls. aaiC was the most expressed virulence related gene in 21 (67.7%) cases vs. 2 (6.3%) controls, (P < 0.000). aggR was found in 18 (58.1%) cases vs. 1 (3.1%) control, (P < 0.000). aatA in 9 (29.0%) cases vs. 1 (3.1%) control (P < 0.006). With genes combined, aaiC+aggR were seen together in 18 (58.1%) cases vs. 1 (3.1%) control (P < 0.000); aaiC+aatA were identified in 9 (29.0%) cases vs. 1 (3.1%) control (P < 0.006); aggR+aatA were present in 9 (29.0%) cases vs. 1 (3.1%) control, (P < 0.006). All three putative genes, aaiC+aggR+aatA were found in 9 (29.0%) cases vs. 1 (3.1%) control, (P < 0.006). The PCR products showed that aaiC, aggR, and aatA occurred in higher frequency and were more commonly associated with EAEC in cases of TD acquired in the two countries of study, as compared to controls. aaiC was found in all cases from Guatemala. Further research is needed to study geographic and host factors in EAEC-causing travelers' diarrhea.

Impact of Physician Training on Diagnosis and Counseling of Overweight and Obese Asian Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Obesity is widely underdiagnosed among Asians, due in part to a lack of physician awareness of the modified diagnostic criteria for Asians. This study investigated the effect of a physician training on accurately diagnosing obesity among and providing weight counseling to overweight and obese Asian patients. METHODS: Physicians (N = 16) from five primary care practices received 1 h of face-to-face training and other reminder resources (e.g., wallet card) describing the guidelines for the diagnosis of overweight/obesity among Asians, as well as weight counseling instruction. Chart reviews of overweight/obese Asian patients were conducted for the 12 months before the training (n = 198) and 3 months following the training (n = 163). Physician race (Asian/non-Asian) and clinic setting (private/academic) were included as outcome moderators. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male (63.1 %), with a mean age of 46.0 years (SD = 14.9) and an average BMI of 28.2 (SD = 3.8). Across all physicians, 26.8 and 45.1 % of patients were accurately diagnosed as overweight or obese before and after the training, respectively (p < 0.05). The odds of a physician correctly diagnosing Asian patients as overweight or obese were 102 % higher at post-training after accounting for nesting of patients within physicians. Similarly, weight counseling was higher (65.0 %) following training compared to pre-training levels (43.9 %) but failed to reach significance (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate identification and counseling of overweight/obese Asian patients can be improved by education and training. Universal adoption of race-specific guidelines will ensure more successful weight management and reduced morbidity in a rapidly growing Asian population.