The use of intraluminal PRESERFLO stenting in avoiding early postoperative hypotony.

PURPOSE: Postoperative hypotony following PRESERFLO MicroShunt (PMS) implantation is a frequent cause of complications such as choroidal detachment and hypotony maculopathy. This study aims at evaluating the impact of intraluminal stenting of the PMS during the early postoperative period. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 97 patients who underwent PMS implantation with intraoperative placement of a Nylon 10-0 suture as intraluminal stent (PStent) and compared the outcomes to those of an existing database of the traditional MicroShunt implantation technique (PTrad, n = 120). The primary outcome measure was the intraocular pressure (IOP) at one week postoperatively. As a secondary outcome measure, adverse hypotony, defined as an IOP ≤ 5 mmHg with significant choroidal effusion and/or anterior chamber shallowing or the presence of macular folds was also assessed. Additionally, the time to stent removal and the IOP one week after stent removal were reported. RESULTS: Preoperative median IOP was 25.0 (20.5-30.3) mmHg in PStent and 25.0 (19.3-32.0) mmHg in PTrad (p = 0.62). One week after surgery, the median IOP dropped to 10.0 (8.0-13.0) mmHg in PStent and 7.0 (5.0-9.0) in PTrad (p < 0.01). At one month, the IOP was 12.0 (10.0-14.0) mmHg in PStent and 10.0 (8.0-11.0) mmHg in PTrad (p < 0.01). After 3 months, both groups showed similar median IOP levels of 11.0 (8.0-13.5) mmHg and 10.0 (9.75-13.0) mmHg in PStent and PTrad, respectively (p = 0.66). The presence of adverse hypotony was significantly lower in PStent compared to PTrad (6.2% vs 15.8%, p < 0.05). In PStent the stent was removed after 30.0 (21.0-42.5) days. One week after stent removal the mean IOP drop was 6.1 ± 0.5 mmHg (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In the early follow-up period, intraluminal stenting of the PMS appears to be safe and effective in controlling the IOP while reducing early postoperative hypotony. Surgical success is not compromised by stent placement. Based on our data, it is recommended to remove the suture two to six weeks after surgery for most patients with uncomplicated postoperative clinical findings.

Standard anterior peritomy versus a small posterior incision for the implantation of the PRESERFLO microshunt.

PURPOSE: To compare two approaches for the implantation of the PRESERFLO microshunt: an anterior approach (A) with a 6-8-mm peritomy and a posterior approach (P) with a 3-mm incision. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 126 patients who received a PRESERFLO microshunt. We compared intraocular pressure (IOP), surgical time, medication count, and postoperative complications over nine months. RESULTS: The baseline IOP was similar in A (21.8 ± 8.5 mm Hg) and P (23.9 ± 8.1 mm Hg) (p = 0.08). Surgical duration was significantly shorter in P (10 ± 0.4 min) than in A (26 ± 0.8 min) (p < 0.001). Postoperative IOP levels were comparable in A (10.8 ± 5.9 mm Hg) and P (10.6 ± 4.5 mm Hg) at 30 days (p = 0.62) and throughout the study (all intra-group p-values > 0.08). The preoperative medication count was 3.2 ± 1.3 drops in A and 3.3 ± 1.0 drops in P (p = 0.4). Postoperative values were 0.2 ± 0.6 in A and 0.3 ± 0.7 in P at nine months. There were no significant differences in complications and surgical revisions between groups (p-values > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both techniques achieved satisfactory IOP and medication count reductions and had similar safety profiles, but the posterior incision technique was 2.6 times faster than the anterior incision technique.

Saudi lung cancer management guidelines 2017.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer management is getting more complex due to the rapid advances in all aspects of diagnostic and therapeutic options. Developing guidelines is critical to help practitioners provide standard of care. METHODS: The Saudi Lung Cancer Guidelines Committee (SLCGC) multidisciplinary members from different specialties and from various regions and healthcare sectors of the country reviewed and updated all lung cancer guidelines with appropriate labeling of level of evidence. Supporting documents to help healthcare professionals were developed. RESULTS: Detailed lung cancer management guidelines were finalized with appropriate resources for systemic therapy and short reviews highlighting important issues. Stage based disease management recommendation were included. A summary explanation for complex topics were included in addition to tables of approved systemic therapy. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary lung cancer guidelines was developed and will be disseminated across the country.

Impact of the 7th TNM staging lung cancer in surgery.

Accurate staging of lung cancer is very critical to determine the proper management approach of each patient and to address prognosis issues. In this manuscript, we will discuss the impact of the most recent staging categories (7th TNM staging) on the management of non-small cell lung cancer.

Plasmapheresis before thymectomy in myasthenia gravis: routine versus selective protocols.

OBJECTIVE: The value of thymectomy in management of myasthenia gravis (MG) is well recognized. Plasmapheresis (PMP) before thymectomy appears to improve the postoperative outcome. As PMP has its own complications, selective use of PMP preoperatively for patients at risk of post-thymectomy complications would improve the postoperative outcome, and decreases the PMP-related complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of routine versus selective use of PMP before thymectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of two different protocols in two institutions comparing the routine (group I) versus selective use (group II) of prethymectomy PMP. The computerized database and the medical records of 164 patients diagnosed with MG who underwent thymectomy between 1998 and 2007, were reviewed. RESULTS: In group I, 74 patients were treated with PMP before thymectomy. In group II (90 patients), 35 patients were identified as high-risk and were treated with PMP before thymectomy, and in 55 patients, thymectomy was performed without preoperative PMP. There was significant difference in the recorded PMP-related complications between group I and group II; 25.7% (19 patients) versus 8.9% (8 patients), respectively. There was no difference between the two groups as regards the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that selective use of PMP before thymectomy may reduce the incidence of PMP-related complications without affecting the overall outcome.