Lower socioeconomic status is not associated with severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: Assessing the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on the severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) on initial presentation to the spinal surgeon remains a challenge. The area deprivation index (ADI) is a validated measure of SES that abstracts multiple domains of disadvantage into a single score. We hypothesized that patients with low SES (high ADI) present to the orthopedic clinic with more advanced curve pathology. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with AIS. Subjects were assigned ADI scores based on Zip codes. Matched cohorts of high and low ADI were generated using propensity scores. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors impacting the magnitude of the curve at presentation. RESULTS: A total of 425 patients with appropriate imaging were included. After matching, the study population was 69.2% female and 92.3% Black. The mean BMI percentile was 61.9. Medicaid covered 57.3% of subjects, and 42.7% had commercial insurance. The mean ADI was 55.5. The mean Cobb angle at presentation was 33.6 degrees. Cobb angle was significantly greater among female patients (36.0 degrees vs 28.0) and among patients with greater BMI percentile (ß = 0.127), but was not significantly associated with ADI, race, or insurance type. ADI was not associated with the rate of surgery. CONCLUSION: ADI is not predictive of curve severity in pediatric patients presenting to the clinic for AIS. Female sex and BMI are independently associated with advanced curvature. Public health workers, primary care providers, and surgeons should remain aware of the complex interactions of socioeconomic factors, BMI and sex when addressing barriers to timely care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.

Effect of Surgical Setting on Cost and Hospital Reported Outcomes for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals seek to reduce costs and improve patient outcomes by decreasing length of stay (LOS), 30-day all-cause readmissions, and preventable complications. We evaluated hospital-reported outcome measures for elective single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs) between tertiary (TH) and community hospitals (CH) to determine location-based differences in complications, LOS, and overall costs. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective single-level ACDF in a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed from a physician-driven database from a single medical system consisting of 1 TH and 4 CHs. Adult patients who underwent elective single-level ACDF were included. Patients with trauma, tumor, prior cervical surgery, and infection were excluded. Outcomes measures included all-cause 30-day readmissions, preventable complications, LOS, and hospital costs. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients (60 TH, 241 CH) were included. CHs had longer LOS (1.25 ± 0.50 versus 1.08 ± 0.28 days, P = .01). There were no differences in complication and readmission rates between hospital settings. CH, orthopaedic subspecialty, female sex, and myelopathy were predictors for longer LOS. Overall, costs at the TH were significantly higher than at CHs ($17 171 versus $11 737; Δ$ = 5434 ± 3996; P < .0001). For CHs, the total costs of drugs, rooms, supplies, and therapy were significantly higher than at the TH. TH status, orthopaedic subspecialty, and myelopathy were associated with higher costs. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing single-level ACDFs at CHs had longer LOS, but similar complications and readmission rates as those at the TH. However, cost of ACDF was 1.5 times greater in the TH. To improve patient outcomes, optimize value, and reduce hospital costs, modifiable factors for elective ACDFs should be evaluated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Patient Satisfaction After Discharge Is Discordant With Reported Inpatient Experience.

Patient satisfaction measures are commonly used to evaluate clinical performance. However, research on the correlation between patient satisfaction scores and actual patient experience is limited. This study aimed to determine the concordance between patient satisfaction reported as an inpatient and patient satisfaction reported after discharge. The study enrolled 231 adult orthopedic patients at least 48 hours after admission to an academic hospital. Study participants rated their overall inpatient experience on a scale of 0 to 10, followed by open-ended questions on their hospital experience. Participants were then randomized to a second survey by either phone or mail at 4 to 6 weeks after discharge. Statistical and qualitative techniques were used to assess concordance in satisfaction scores and the agreement and association between patient experiences and patient satisfaction scores. The median overall patient satisfaction scores were 9.5 as inpatients (interquartile range [IQR], 8-10) and 10 at follow-up (IQR, 8-10), with a poor concordance between the inpatient and follow-up satisfaction scores (ρc=0.28). This study raises concerns regarding the validity of patient satisfaction measures to accurately quantify inpatient experience and the limitations related to its modes of administration. The authors observed poor agreement between the reported experience as an inpatient and the recollection of the inpatient experience after discharge. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):e427-e433.].

The Prevalence of Bacterial Infection in Patients Undergoing Elective ACDF for Degenerative Cervical Spine Conditions: A Prospective Cohort Study With Contaminant Control.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of bacterial infection, with the use of a contaminant control, in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: After institutional review board approval, patients undergoing elective ACDF were prospectively enrolled. Samples of the longus colli muscle and disc tissue were obtained. The tissue was then homogenized, gram stained, and cultured in both aerobic and anaerobic medium. Patients were classified into 4 groups depending on culture results. Demographic, preoperative, and postoperative factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were enrolled, 41.7% were males with an average age of 54 ± 11 years and a body mass index of 29.7 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Seventeen patients (17.7%) were considered true positives, having a negative control and positive disc culture. Otherwise, no significant differences in culture positivity was found between groups of patients. However, our results show that patients were more likely to have both control and disc negative than being a true positive (odds ratio = 6.2, 95% confidence interval = 2.5-14.6). Propionibacterium acnes was the most commonly identified bacteria. Two patients with disc positive cultures returned to the operating room secondary to pseudarthrosis; however, age, body mass index, prior spine surgery or injection, postoperative infection, and reoperations were not associated with culture results. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, the prevalence of subclinical bacterial infection in patients undergoing ACDF was 17.7%. While our rates exclude patients with positive contaminant control, the possibility of contamination of disc cultures could not be entirely rejected. Overall, culture results did not have any influence on postoperative outcomes.

Effect of Surgical Setting on Hospital-Reported Outcomes for Elective Lumbar Spinal Procedures: Tertiary Versus Community Hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: As hospital compensation becomes increasingly dependent on pay-for-performance and bundled payment compensation models, hospitals seek to reduce costs and increase quality. To our knowledge, no reported data compare these measures between hospital settings for elective lumbar procedures. The study compares hospital-reported outcomes and costs for elective lumbar procedures performed at a tertiary hospital (TH) versus community hospitals (CH) within a single health care system. METHODS: Retrospective review of a physician-maintained, prospectively collected database consisting of 1 TH and 4 CH for 3 common lumbar surgeries from 2015 to 2016. Patients undergoing primary elective microdiscectomy for disc herniation, laminectomy for spinal stenosis, and laminectomy with fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis were included. Patients were excluded for traumatic, infectious, or malignant pathology. Comparing hospital settings, outcomes included length of stay (LOS), rates of 30-day readmissions, potentially preventable complications (PPC), and discharge to rehabilitation facility, and hospital costs. RESULTS: A total of 892 patients (n = 217 microdiscectomies, n = 302 laminectomies, and n = 373 laminectomy fusions) were included. The TH served a younger patient population with fewer comorbid conditions and a higher proportion of African Americans. The TH performed more decompressions (P < .001) per level fused; the CH performed more interbody fusions (P = .007). Cost of performing microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy (P = .014) was significantly higher at the TH, but there was no significant difference for laminectomy with fusion. In a multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis, the TH was significantly more expensive for single-level microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy with single-level fusion (P < .001), but trended toward significance for laminectomy without fusion (P = .052). No difference existed for PPC or readmissions rate. Patients undergoing laminectomy without fusion were discharged to a facility more often at the TH (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: We provide hospital-reported outcomes between a TH and CH. Significant differences in patient characteristics and surgical practices exist between surgical settings. Despite minimal differences in hospital-reported outcomes, the TH was significantly more expensive.

Radiographic Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Instrumentation and Fusion for Treating Unstable Spinal Column Injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: Facet fusion in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) may reduce morbidity and promote long-term construct stability. The study compares the maintenance of correction of thoracolumbar (TL) trauma patients who underwent MISS with facet fusion (FF) and without facet fusion (WOFF) and evaluates instrumentation loosening and failure. METHODS: TL trauma patients who underwent MISS between 2006 and 2013 were identified and stratified into FF and WOFF groups. To evaluate progressive kyphosis and loss of correction, Cobb angles were measured at immediate postoperative, short-term, and long-term follow-up. Evidence of >2 mm of radiolucency on radiographs indicated screw loosening. If instrumentation was removed, postremoval kyphosis angle was obtained. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients, 24 were in FF and 56 were in WOFF group. Between immediate postoperative and short-term follow-up, kyphosis angle changed by 4.0° (standard error [SE] 1.3°) in the FF and by 3.0° (SE 0.4°) in the WOFF group. The change between immediate postoperative and long-term follow-up kyphosis angles was 3.4° (S.E 1.1°) and 5.2° (S.E 1.6°) degrees in the FF and WOFF groups, respectively. Facet fusion had no impact on the change in kyphosis at short term (P = .49) or long term (P = .39). The screw loosening rate was 20.5% for the 80 patients with short-term follow-up and 68.8% for the 16 patients with long-term follow-up. There was no difference in screw loosening rate. Fifteen patients underwent instrumentation removal-all from the FF group. CONCLUSION: FF in MISS does not impact the correction achieved and maintenance of correction in patients with traumatic spine injuries.

Comparison of percutaneous minimally invasive versus open posterior spine surgery for fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: A retrospective matched cohort analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is a treatment option for thoracolumbar fractures and we aim to evaluate its outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study of all patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated with MISS or open posterior approach. RESULTS: We included 100 MISS and 155 open patients. After controlling for patient characteristics, our results statistically favor MISS in mean operative time, mean intraoperative blood loss, and number of patients requiring postoperative blood transfusions within 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: Advantages of using MISS for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures are decreased operative time, decreased blood loss, and fewer patients requiring transfusions.

The use of minimally invasive surgery in spine trauma: a review of concepts.

Traumatic injuries to the spine can be common in the setting of blunt trauma and delayed diagnosis can have a deleterious effect on patients' health. The goals of treatment in managing spine trauma are prevention of neurological injury, providing stability to the spine, and correcting post-traumatic deformity. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques are an alternative to open spine surgery for treatment of spine fractures. MISS is also a viable treatment in the setting of damage control orthopedics, when patients with multiple traumatic injuries may be unable to tolerate a traditional open approach. MISS techniques have been used in the treatment of unstable fractures with or without spinal cord injury, flexion and extension-distraction injuries, and unstable sacral fractures. Traditional open surgeries have been associated with increased blood loss, longer operative times, and a higher risk for surgical site infection (SSI). MISS techniques have the potential to reduce open approach-associated morbidity, and improve postoperative care and rehabilitation. MISS techniques for spine trauma are an indispensable option in the treatment armamentarium of spine surgeons.

Delayed Diagnosis of Tandem Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Institutional Review.

BACKGROUND: Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is defined as simultaneous spinal stenosis in the cervical, thoracic, and/or lumbar regions and may present with both upper and lower motor neuron symptoms, neurogenic claudication, and gait disturbance. Current literature has focused mainly on the prevalence of TSS and treatment methods, while the incidence of delayed TSS diagnosis is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of delayed TSS diagnosis at our institution and describe the clinical characteristics commonly observed in their particular presentation. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, an institutional billing database review was performed for patients who underwent a spinal decompression procedure between 2006 and 2016. Thirty-three patients who underwent decompression on 2 separate spinal regions within 1 year were included for review. Patients with delayed diagnosis of TSS following the first surgery were differentiated from those with preoperative diagnosis of TSS. RESULTS: TSS requiring surgical decompression occurred in 33 patients, with the incidence being 2.06% in this cohort. Fifteen patients received a delayed diagnosis after the first surgical decompression (45%) and were found to have a longer interval between decompressions (7.6 ± 2.1 months versus 4.01 ± 3 months, P = .0004). Patients undergoing lumbar decompression as the initial procedure were more likely to have a delayed diagnosis of TSS (8 versus 2 patients, P = .0200). The most common presentation of delayed TSS was pain and myelopathic symptoms that persisted after decompressive surgery. CONCLUSION: TSS should remain within the differential diagnosis for patients at initial presentation of spinal stenosis. In addition, suspicion of TSS should be heightened if preoperative symptoms fail to expectedly improve following decompression even if overt myelopathic signs are not present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The Utility of In-Hospital Postoperative Radiographs Following Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the utility of routine in-hospital postoperative radiographs for identifying hardware failure following surgical treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar (TL) injuries. BACKGROUND: Postoperative radiographs following spine surgery are considered standard of care despite a lack of evidence supporting their utility. Previous studies have concluded that postoperative radiographs following lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions have limited clinical value. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent surgical treatment of traumatic TL injuries between December 2006 and October 2015 at a level I trauma center. Before discharge, postoperative upright anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained and reviewed by 1 surgeon and 1 radiologist as per protocol. Patients who subsequently underwent revision surgery during their initial hospital stay were identified. These patients were further analyzed to identify the indications for surgery and determine if the results of the radiographs obtained led to the subsequent revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 463 patients were identified who underwent surgical treatment following TL trauma. The rate of revision surgery during the initial hospitalization was 1.3% (6/463). Three patients underwent revision surgery due to worsening neurological status. One patient underwent reoperation because of advance imaging obtained for abdominal trauma. Two patients underwent revision surgery due to abnormal findings on postoperative radiographs. The overall sensitivity and specificity of routine postoperative radiographs was 33.3% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of new clinical signs and symptoms, obtaining routine in-hospital postoperative radiographs following surgical treatment of TL injuries provides minimal value. Clinical assessment should help determine if additional imaging is indicated for the patient. Avoiding unnecessary inpatient tests such as routine postoperative radiograph may offer multitude of benefits including lowering patient radiation exposure, reducing health care costs and better allocation of hospital resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN: Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative spondylosis. METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, 59 patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either 60 mL injection of 266 mg LB or 60 mL of 0.9% sterile saline, intraoperatively. Outcome measures included the incidence of postoperative AEs and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The most common AEs in the treatment group were nausea (39.3%), emesis (18.1%), and hypotension (18.1%). Nausea (23%), constipation (19.2%), and urinary retention (15.3%) were most common in the control group. Patients who received LB had an increased risk of developing nausea (relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-3.8), emesis (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.51-10.7), and headaches (RR = 2.36; 95% CI = 0.26-21.4). Patients receiving LB had a decreased risk of developing constipation (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.25-2.43), urinary retention (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.21-2.85), and pruritus (RR = 0.78; 95% = 0.21-2.8) postoperatively. Relative risk values mentioned above failed to reach statistical significance. No significant difference in the hospital length of stay between both groups was found (3.9 vs 3.9 days; P = .92). CONCLUSION: Single-dose injections of LB to the surgical site prior to wound closure did not significantly increase or decrease the incidence or risk of developing AEs postoperatively. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the hospital length of stay between both groups.

Decompression Versus Fusion for Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis of evidence level I to IV studies. OBJECTIVE: To compare decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion in the treatment of grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). METHODS: Following established guidelines, we systematically reviewed 3 electronic databases to assess studies evaluating patients with grade I DS. We stratified all patients into 2 cohorts; the first cohort underwent a decompression-type surgery, and the second cohort underwent decompression plus fusion. We noted clinical outcomes, complications, reoperations, and surgical details such as blood loss. Descriptive statistics and random-effects models were used to determine the specified outcome metrics with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In both cohorts, the pain (legs and lower back) significantly decreased and the physical component of the Short Form 36 showed better patient clinical outcomes. The decompression cohort had a 5.8% complication rate (95% CI = 1.7-2.1), and the decompression plus fusion cohort had an 8.3% complication rate (95% CI = 5.5-11.6). The reoperation rate was higher in the decompression-only cohort (8.5%; 95% CI = 2.9-17.0) compared with the decompression plus fusion cohort (4.9%; 95% CI = 2.5-7.9). CONCLUSIONS: There does not appear to be any advantage of one procedure over the other. Patients undergoing decompression alone tended to be older with a higher percentage of leg pain, whereas patients additionally undergoing fusion tended to be younger with more lower back pain. The decompression-only cohort had fewer complications but a higher revision rate.

Effect of forced-air warming blanket position in elective lumbar spine surgery: Intraoperative body temperature and postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypothermia is linked to multiple postoperative complications including increased surgical bleeding, surgical site infection, myocardial events, and increased length of hospital stay. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of forced-air warming blanket position, above the shoulders versus under the trunk/legs, on intraoperative core body temperature and perioperative complications in elective lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: After IRB approval, patients were enrolled in a consecutive fashion and randomized to either upper body (Group I) or lower body (Group II) groups. Primary outcomes were intraoperative body temperature, incidence of hypothermia, postoperative complications, and infection. Secondary outcomes included blood loss, operative time, and length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included (Group I, 38; Group II, 36, mean age 60.7 years, 54% of male). Average patient follow-up was 69 ± 33.6 days in Group I and 67 ± 34.6 days in Group II. Average intraoperative body temperature was 35.7 in Group I and 35.8 in Group II (P = 0.27). Incidence of critical hypothermia (T < 35°C) was 18.4% and 11.1% in Groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.52). Incidence of mild hypothermia (T: 35°C-36°C) was 34.2% and 30.56% in Groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.81). Separately, pooled analysis comparing average body temperature and incidence infection demonstrated a relationship between mild hypothermia and infection (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Compared to using a lower body Bair Hugger under the patient, using standard upper body Bair Hugger may be associated with increased surgical site infection. Given equivalent body warming, we recommend using the lower body Bair Hugger to avoid infection.

Outcomes of multilevel vertebrectomy for spondylodiscitis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The incidence of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) continues to increase in the United States, highlighting the need to recognize unique challenges presented by these cases and develop effective methods of surgical management. To date, no prior research has focused on the outcomes of PVO requiring two or more contiguous corpectomies. PURPOSE: To describe our experience in the operative management of PVO in 56 consecutive patients who underwent multilevel corpectomies (≥2 vertebral bodies) via a combined approach. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Single institution retrospective cohort review between January 2002 and December 2015. All patients had been treated at an academic tertiary referral center by one of two fellowship-trained orthopedic spine surgeons. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patient records were cross-referenced with International Classification of Diseases osteomyelitis codes and paravertebral abscess code. Inclusion criteria for the study were patients within the cohort who had adequate medical records for review, a minimum patient age of 18 years, active vertebral osteomyelitis as an indication for surgical intervention, a minimum of 1-year radiographic follow-up, and surgical intervention that included at least two complete vertebral corpectomies. Subsequently, 56 patients met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed for this retrospective analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of interest were readmission and reoperation rates related to treatment of PVO, 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, radiographic outcomes, perioperative complications, infection control, and length of stay. METHODS: After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board, retrospective review was performed on records of all adults with PVO refractory to standard nonoperative treatment who underwent complete corpectomy of two or more contiguous vertebrae at a single institution between January 2002 and December 2015. This study was not funded, and no potential conflict of interest-associated biases were present. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were identified (63% men; mean age 56.8 years; mean radiographic follow-up 2.8 years). Median length of stay was 13 days with nearly half readmitted (47%) after a median of 222.5 days after surgery. Twelve (22%) posterior revisions were required after a median 54 days for infection, painful or failed hardware, proximal junction kyphosis, adjacent level disease, or extension of the fusion. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality rates were 7.14% and 19.6%, respectively, with an infectious etiology as the most common cause of death. CONCLUSIONS: Multilevel vertebral corpectomy for treatment of refractory vertebral osteomyelitis is associated with relatively high rates of complications and mortality compared with historical controls for 1 or 2 level procedures. We found clinical resolution and absence of complications requiring return to the operating room in 75% of patients when complete extirpation of the involved vertebrae is achieved. Our findings suggest multilevel anterior corpectomies with posterior stabilization may be a reasonable surgical option when approaching patients with complicated spondylodiscitis.

The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Lumbar Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management in spine surgery holds unique challenges. The purpose of this study is to determine if the local anesthetic liposomal bupivacaine (LB) reduces the total opioid requirement in the first 3 days following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) surgery for degenerative spondylosis. METHODS: Fifty patients underwent PLDF surgery in a prospective randomized control pilot trial between August 2015 and October 2016 and were equally allocated to either a treatment (LB) or a control (saline) group. Assessments included the 72-hour postoperative opioid requirement normalized to 1 morphine milligram equivalent (MME), visual analog scale (VAS), and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: LB did not significantly alter the 72-hour postoperative opioid requirement compared to saline (11.6 vs. 13.4 MME, P = .40). In a subgroup analysis, there was also no significant difference in opioid consumption among narcotic-naive patients with either LB or saline. Among narcotic tolerant patients, however, opioid consumption was higher with saline than LB (20.6 MME vs. 13.3 MME, P = .048). Additionally, pre- and postoperative VAS scores and hospital length of stay were not significantly different with either LB or saline. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of PLDF surgery, LB injections did not significantly reduce the consumption of opioids in the first 3 postoperative days, nor did the hospital length of stay or VAS pain scores, compared to saline. However, LB could be beneficial in reducing the consumption of opioids in narcotic-tolerant populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Mortality Rates After Posterior C1-2 Fusion for Displaced Type II Odontoid Fractures in Octogenarians.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study OBJECTIVE.: To assess 30-day and 1-year mortality rates as well as the most common complications associated with posterior C1-2 fusion in an octogenarian cohort. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment of unstable type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients can present challenges. Recent evidence indicates in patients older than 80 years, posterior C1-2 fusion results in improved survival as compared to other modes of treatment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 43 consecutive patients (25 female and 18 male; mean age 84.3 yr, range 80-89 yr; mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.4, (range 1-6); mean body mass index 24.8 ±â€Š4.2 kg/m, who underwent posterior C1-C2 fusion for management of unstable type II odontoid fracture by four fellowship trained spine surgeons at a single institution between January 2006 to June 2016. RESULTS: Mean fracture displacement was 5.1 ±â€Š3.6 mm and mean absolute value of angulation was 19.93°â€Š±â€Š12.93°. The most common complications were altered mental status (41.9%, n = 18), dysphagia (27.9%, n = 12) with 50% of those patients (6/12) requiring a feeding tube, and emergency reintubation (9.3%, n = 4). To the date of review completion, 25 of 43 patients expired (58.1%), median survival of 1.76 years from the date of surgery. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality rates were 2.3% and 18.6%, respectively. Patients who developed dysphagia were 14.5 times more likely to have expired at 1 year; dysphagia was also found to be significantly associated with degree of displacement. Fracture displacement was found to be associated with increased odds for 1-year mortality when accounting for age and requirement of a feeding tube. CONCLUSION: Posterior C1-2 fusion results in acceptably low mortality rates in octogenarians with unstable type II odontoid fractures when compared to nonoperative management mortality rates in current literature. Initial fracture displacement is associated with higher mortality rate in this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Outcomes of lumbopelvic fixation in the treatment of complex sacral fractures using minimally invasive surgical techniques.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Complex sacral fractures with vertical and anterior pelvic ring instability treated with traditional fixation methods are associated with high rates of failure and poor clinical outcomes. Supplemental lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) has been applied for additional stability to help with fracture union. PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine whether minimally invasive LPF provides reliable fracture stability and acceptable complication rates in cases of complex sacral fractures. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a retrospective cohort study at a single level I trauma center. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample includes 24 patients who underwent minimally invasive LPF for complex sacral fracture with or without associated pelvic ring injury. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reoperation for all causes, loss of fixation, surgical time, transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, postoperative day at mobilization, and mortality were evaluated. METHODS: Patient charts from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. Of the 32 patients who underwent minimally invasive LPF for complex sacral fractures, 24 (12 male, 12 female) met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcome measures were assessed with a retrospective chart review and radiographic review. The authors did not receive external funding for this study. RESULTS: Acute reoperation was 12%, and elective reoperation was 29%. Two (8%) patients returned to the operating room for infection, one (4.2%) required revision for instrumentation malposition, and seven (29%) underwent elective removal of instrumentation. No patient experienced failure of instrumentation or loss of correction. Average surgical time was 3.6 hours, blood loss was 180 mL, transfusion requirement was 2.1 units of packed red blood cells, and postoperative mobilization was on postoperative day 5. No mortalities occurred as a result of the minimally invasive LPF procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with historic reports of open LPF, our results demonstrate reliable maintenance of reduction and acceptable complication rates with minimally invasive LPF for complexsacral fractures. The benefits of minimally invasive LPF may be offset with increased elective reoperations for removal of instrumentation.

Facet Joint Violation During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: A Comparison of Two Techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: A comparative study of facet joint violation (FJV) using two percutaneous surgical techniques. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of iatrogenic FJV and medial pedicle wall breach between two methods of percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation in the thoracic and lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Variable iatrogenic damage to the facet joints has been reported to occur with percutaneous pedicle screw techniques, compared with the open approach, which has been associated with adjacent segment disease. Technical variations of percutaneous pedicle screw placement may pose different risks to the facet joint. METHODS: Attending spine surgeons percutaneously placed pedicle screws in seven human cadaveric spines from T2 to L5. At each level, screws were instrumented on one side using the 9 or 3 o'clock reference point of the pedicle on the posteroanterior view with a lateral-to-medial trajectory (LMT) and on the contralateral side using the center of the pedicle with an owl's eye trajectory (OET). Postoperative screw placement was assessed with computed tomography and then open cadaveric dissection. Outcome measures included FJV and medial pedicle wall breach. RESULTS: Overall, 17 of 105 screws placed with an LMT versus 49 of 105 screws placed with an OET violated or abutted the facet joint (P <0.0001). This significant difference was observed at the thoracic (T2-T10), thoracolumbar (T11-L1), and lumbar (L2-L5) levels (P = 0.003, 0.035, and 0.018, respectively). Medial pedicle wall breach occurred with 11 LMT screws and seven OET screws (P = 0.077), and no breach was considered critical. CONCLUSION: A significantly higher FJV rate was observed using the OET versus the LMT in the thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar spine. No statistically significant differences in medial pedicle wall breach occurred between the techniques. Thus, the LMT of minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation may reduce iatrogenic damage to the facet joints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of ligamentous injury in the pelvis: a prospective case-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Management of external rotation pelvic ring disruptions is based on which ligaments are disrupted within the pelvis. We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can evaluate the ligaments of the pelvic ring and differentiate injured from uninjured pelves. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients with 25 acute external rotation injuries of the hemipelvis; control group of 26 patients without pelvic ring injury. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent the same MRI protocol reviewed by 1 musculoskeletal radiologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Integrity of 5 structures: sacrospinous, sacrotuberous, anterior sacroiliac, and posterior sacroiliac ligaments and pelvic floor musculature. RESULTS: Visualization of sacrospinous, sacrotuberous, anterior sacroiliac, and posterior sacroiliac ligaments, and pelvic floor musculature was possible for 91%, 100%, 98%, 91%, and 100%, respectively, of all studied structures. No injuries were identified in control group patients in contrast to ligament injury observed with all injured pelves (0% versus 100%; P < 0.0001). Observed relationship of ligament injury to pelvic injury type generally agreed with the Young-Burgess classification system, with the important exception that patients with anterior-posterior compression type II injuries had damage to the sacrospinous ligament in only 50% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Ligamentous anatomy and injury about the pelvic ring appears to be easily evaluated with MRI, arguing that there may be a role for this imaging modality in managing these cases. Tearing of the sacrospinous ligament is variable among anterior-posterior compression type II injuries, arguing that the injury pattern can be subdivided into those with and without sacrospinous ligament tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anatomic mapping of lumbar nerve roots during a direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine: a cadaveric study.

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE: Identifying anatomic structures at risk for injury during direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Direct lateral transpsoas approach is a novel technique that has been described for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Potential risks include damage to genitofemoral nerve and lumbar plexus, which are not well visualized during small retroperitoneal exposure. Previous cadaveric studies did not evaluate the direct lateral transpsoas approach, and considering the approach being used in clinical practice, the current study was undertaken in an effort to identify the structures at risk during direct lateral transpsoas approach. METHODS: Sixteen dissections were performed on eight fresh-frozen male cadavers. Eight were to localize proximal lumbar nerve roots, ilioinguinal nerves, and genitofemoral nerves and establish their relationship to psoas muscle and disc space. Four simulated direct lateral transpsoas approaches, with K-wire placed into mid-disc space under fluoroscopic guidance, were made. In four dissections, sequential dilators were inserted, disc space was evacuated, and interbody devices were placed. The study was conducted in three phases to identify, in a stepwise progression, which portion of the procedure placed the nerve at greatest risk. RESULTS.: With initial dissections, perforating branches of lumbar nerve roots were identified in anterior, middle, and posterior third of psoas muscle. Sympathetic chain was identified in anterior third of psoas over L1-L4. Distance from the middle of the anterior longitudinal ligament at the level of the disc to the sympathetic chain averaged 9.25 mm. The nerve roots and genitofemoral nerve were placed at risk in all dissections in which the approach was recreated. Damage secondary to K-wire placement occurred in 25% of cases at L3-L4 and L4-L5; in one case, L4 nerve root was pierced, and in another, genitofemoral nerve was pierced. K-wire was posterior to the nerve roots in 25% of cases at L3-L4 and in 50% of cases at L4-L5. The lumbar plexus was placed under tension because of sequential dilator placement. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our results, there is no zone of absolute safety when using the direct lateral transpsoas approach. The potential for nerve injury exists when using this approach, and consequently, we recommend either direct visualization of the nerve roots intraoperatively and/or the use of neuromonitoring. In our opinion, a higher quality, larger clinical study that examines the outcomes and surgical complications of the direct lateral transpsoas approach is warranted.