Predictors of health after operation for aortoiliac occlusive and aneurysmal disease.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of comorbid conditions and revascularization for aortoiliac occlusive and aneurysmal disease and determined the functional health status of patients with the Medical Outcomes Study SF36 Health Survey. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients were surveyed prospectively, before operation, and at intervals ranging from 2 weeks to 2 years after operation. To identify the factors that influenced functional health, multiple regression analysis was performed to test the hypothesis that age, pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes, aortoiliac occlusive disease (AOD) versus aneurysmal disease, and the preoperative physical summary score affected outcome. RESULTS: Regression analysis identified that before operation, the physical summary score (PCS) was affected by pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, and AOD, and patients with AOD had significantly worse PCS than patients with aneurysmal disease (43.2 +/- 12.6 vs 30.1 +/- 8.3, P <.05). This difference was also present after 3 to 12 months, and the preoperative PCS was the strongest predictor of the postoperative score. For patients followed up between 1 and 2 years, there was no significant difference among the groups, and atherosclerotic heart disease and pulmonary disease were identified to most affect the PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AOD have significantly impaired physical function (as compared with patients with aneurysmal disease) that is successfully reversed with a surgical procedure. The functional health of patients after operation for aneurysmal disease returns to baseline after 3 and 12 months. Ultimately, cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities have a continued effect on the functional health of patients.

Predictors of health after revascularization for extremity ischemia.

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of surgical revascularization for lower extremity ischemia, we determined (with the use of the SF-36 health survey) the functional health status of patients who underwent either inflow or outflow procedures. METHODS: The SF-36 survey was given prospectively to 104 patients before operation and at intervals ranging from 10 days to 1 year after operation from January 1998 to July 1999. To determine whether revascularization was associated with improved patient health status, mean scores were compared before and after operation by univariate and multivariate analysis. To identify the factors that influenced patient health status, we performed multiple regression analysis to test the hypothesis that outcome is affected by age, gender, time since procedure, diabetes, indication, and inflow versus outflow procedure. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the general health score of patients before outflow bypass as compared with inflow procedure (45.3 +/- 5.3 versus 32.1 +/- 3.3 [mean +/- SEM]; P <.05). After the procedure, only those patients who had undergone inflow procedures had improved outcome scores. Diabetes, outflow procedures, limb salvage as indication, and time since operation were determined by multiple regression affecting outcome scores to be significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: The SF-36 health survey demonstrated that diabetes, procedure type, indication, and time after procedure significantly affected the functional outcome for patients who were treated surgically for lower extremity ischemia. Despite successful revascularization, significant deficits in functional health remain in patients with lower extremity ischemia.

Management of the patient with complex orthopaedic fractures.

Patients who sustain complex orthopaedic fractures related to a traumatic event can develop devastating complications. Patients who sustain open fractures are at greater risk for complications such as wound and systemic infections and nonunion of the fracture itself. This article describes the management of open complex extremity fractures through a case study approach.