Factors influencing treatment zone size in orthokeratology.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of corneal topography, contact lens parameters and degree of myopia on the treatment zone (TZ) and peripheral plus ring (PPR) size in orthokeratology. METHODS: In this retrospective study the topographic zones of the right eyes of 106 patients (73 female, 22.16 ± 8.96 years) were analyzed in the tangential difference map of the Oculus Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Using the MB-Ruler Pro 5.4 software (MB-Softwaresolutions, Iffezheim, Germany) the horizontal, vertical, longest, shortest diameters and area of the TZ; horizontal, vertical, total diameters and width of the PPR were measured. Correlations were determined between these zones and the subjects' baseline parameters (myopia; corneal diameter, radii, astigmatism, eccentricity, sagittal height; contact lens radii, toricity and total diameter) for three back optic zone diameter (BOZD) groups (5.5, 6.0 and 6.6 mm). A stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to test for TZ and PPR predictability. RESULTS: In the group of BOZD 6.0 correlations were found between the amount of myopia and the short TZ diameter (r = -0.25, p = 0.025); the steep corneal radius and the vertical diameter (r = -0.244, p = 0.029), the longest diameter (r = -0.254, p = 0.023) and the area (r = -0.228, p = 0.042) of the TZ; the amount of astigmatism and PPR width (r = 0.266, p = 0.017); eccentricity of the steep corneal meridian and PPR width (r = -0.222, p = 0.047). BOZD correlated significantly positively with all zones (p < 0.05). The best prediction model (R2 = 0.389) resulted with the TZ area as the outcome variable. CONCLUSION: The amount of myopia, topography and contact lens parameters influence TZ and PPR in orthokeratology. Describing the TZ by its area may provide the most accurate representation of its size.

Evidence-based teaching in contact lenses education: Teaching and learning strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Contact lens (CL) practice is an ever-changing field with clinical knowledge, techniques and equipment continuously evolving. These new developments are backed with clinical trials and research to ensure that practitioners feel confident that there is an evidence base to support these advances. Evidence-based practice is now a crucial part of CL practice, and its importance also filters down to CL education. For example, lectures are one of the most popular tools for an educator but, is standing at the front of a lecture theatre full of students a more effective way of teaching than providing the same material for students to read by themselves? What evidence exists specific to CL education? METHOD: An expert panel of educators completed a comprehensive literature review of current evidence of teaching methods in CL training, or if not available then what can be learnt from other health care professional training that could be potentially applicable to CL education. RESULTS: Due to the amount of evidence available in the overall subject area relating to healthcare education, the initial plan of compiling evidence into one narrative review paper was discarded in favour of producing two linked papers. Here, the first paper details definitions of terminology, and also teaching methods. The second paper focuses on assessment and specific clinical training required to attain CL practice competency. In this first paper, no direct evidence of the spreading and benefit of new education strategies evidence such as flipped classrooms, spaced learning, test-enhanced learning, group work, CBL, PBL, TBL, and reflective practice in CL education was found. The only technique that was widely used in the CL field was case reports and the group discussion of them. Nevertheless, the authors found a consensus of opinion from other disciplines that are transferable to CL teaching and could help students meet the intended learning outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is a small amount of evidence supporting CL education, but most of this seems to be related to the practical element of the training. However, there is a lot of evidence in the field of healthcare education from related disciplines which provides additional but important learning tools that may be effectively implemented in CL education.

Scheimpflug imaging for grading and measurement of corneo-scleral-profile in different quadrants.

PURPOSE: The corneo-scleral-profile (CSP) describes the transition from cornea to sclera, while the corneo-scleral junction angle (CSJ), is the angle formed between the cornea and the sclera. The aims of this study were (i) to analyse the CSP and CSJ in different quadrants and (ii) to test correlation and repeatability of an established observational grading and measurement method, using Scheimpflug images. METHODS: The nasal, temporal, superior and inferior CSP of 35 healthy eye participants (mean age 25.5 SD ± 3.1 years; 20 female) was imaged using the corneo-scleral-profile module of the Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). On the captured Scheimpflug images CSP was subjectively graded into five different corneo-scleral transitions, using the Meier grading scale (profile 1 fluid-convex; profile 2 fluid-tangential; profile 3 marked-convex; profile 4 marked-tangential; profile 5 concave). The CSJ was measured on the same images using ImageJ v1.8.0. Grading and measurement was repeated at a second session. Intra-observer reliability for the CSP-grading was analysed by Cohen's Kappa. Differences between repeated CSJ-measurements and different quadrants were analysed by paired-t-test and ANOVA. The eta-coefficient was used to determine the association between subjective CSP-grading and CSJ-measurement. RESULTS: Intra-observer reliability for the CSP grading system was poor (kappa = 0.098) whereas repeated measurements of CSJ angle showed no statistically significant difference between sessions (0.04°; 95 % CI - 0.21° to 0.29°; p = 0.77). CSJ angles ranged from 172° to 180° with no statistically significant differences between nasal, temporal, superior and inferior (p = 0.24). Eta-coefficient indicated a weak association between CSP-grading and CSJ-measurement (η = 0.27; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The subjective CSP-grading showed poorer repeatability than the objective CSJ-measurement, which did not detect any differences in angles between the meridians. The weak association between CSP-grading and CSJ-measurement is likely caused by the limited intra-observer reliability of the Meier grading scale. Furthermore, the CSP-grading scale seems to consider other aspects beside the CSJ angle, such as scleral radius.

Daily Variations of Corneal White-to-White Diameter Measured with Different Methods.

Purpose: A precise determination of the corneal diameter is essential for the diagnosis of various ocular diseases, cataract and refractive surgery as well as for the selection and fitting of contact lenses. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between two automatic and one manual method for corneal diameter determination and to evaluate possible diurnal variations in corneal diameter. Patients and Methods: Horizontal white-to-white corneal diameter of 20 volunteers was measured at three different fixed times of a day with three methods: Scheimpflug method (Pentacam HR, Oculus), placido based topography (Keratograph 5M, Oculus) and manual method using an image analysis software at a slitlamp (BQ900, Haag-Streit). Results: The two-factorial analysis of variance could not show a significant effect of the different instruments (p = 0.117), the different time points (p = 0.506) and the interaction between instrument and time point (p = 0.182). Very good repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient ICC, quartile coefficient of dispersion QCD) was found for all three devices. However, manual slitlamp measurements showed a higher QCD than the automatic measurements with the Keratograph 5M and the Pentacam HR at all measurement times. Conclusion: The manual and automated methods used in the study to determine corneal diameter showed good agreement and repeatability. No significant diurnal variations of corneal diameter were observed during the period of time studied.

Prediction of anterior ocular surface sagittal heights using Placido-based corneal topography in healthy eyes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the validity of Placido-based corneal topography parameters to predict corneoscleral sagittal heights measured by Fourier-based profilometry at various diameters. METHODS: Minimal (Minsag ), maximal (Maxsag ) sagittal height, toricity (Maxsag - Minsag ) and axis of the flattest meridian (Minsag ) of 36 subjects (mean age 25.4 SD ± 3.2 years; 21 female) were measured using the Eye Surface Profiler and analysed for diameters (chord length) of 8 to 16 mm (in 2-mm intervals). Furthermore, corneal central radii, corneal astigmatism, eccentricity and diameter were measured using the Keratograph 5 M. RESULTS: Using multiple linear regression analysis, the best equation for predicting the sagittal heights for 8 mm (r2  = 0.95), and 10 mm (r2  = 0.93) diameters included corneal central radii and eccentricity. The best equation for predicting sagittal heights for 12 mm (r2  = 0.86), 14 mm (r2  = 0.78) and 16 mm (r2  = 0.65) diameters included corneal central radii, eccentricity and corneal diameter. Corneal astigmatism was significantly correlated with sagittal height toricity for 8 and 10 mm diameters (r2  = 0.50 and 0.29; p < 0.01), while no correlation was observed for 12, 14 and 16 mm diameters (p = 0.18 to p = 0.76). The axis of the flattest corneal meridian measured by Placido-based topography was significantly correlated with the axis of the flattest meridian measured by Fourier-based profilometry for 8, 10 and 12 mm diameters (r2  = 0.17 to 0.44; p < 0.05), while there was no correlation for 14 and 16 mm diameters (p = 0.48 and p = 0.75). For a typical soft contact lens diameter of 14 mm, 78% of the variance could be determined with a corneal topographer and 68% with keratometry and corneal diameter measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of corneal central radii, eccentricity and corneal diameter measured by Placido-based topography is a valid predictor of the corneoscleral sagittal height in healthy eyes. Scleral toricity and axis of the flattest meridian seem to be independent from Placido-based corneal parameters and requires additional measuring tools.

CLEAR - Anatomy and physiology of the anterior eye.

A key element of contact lens practice involves clinical evaluation of anterior eye health, including the cornea and limbus, conjunctiva and sclera, eyelids and eyelashes, lacrimal system and tear film. This report reviews the fundamental anatomy and physiology of these structures, including the vascular supply, venous drainage, lymphatic drainage, sensory innervation, physiology and function. This is the foundation for considering the potential interactions with, and effects of, contact lens wear on the anterior eye. This information is not consistently published as academic research and this report provides a synthesis from all available sources. With respect to terminology, the report aims to promote the consistent use of nomenclature in the field, and generally adopts anatomical terms recommended by the Federative Committee for Anatomical Terminology. Techniques for the examination of the ocular surface are also discussed.

Evaluation of tear meniscus height using different clinical methods.

Clinical relevance: The height of the tear meniscus (TMH) is a generally accepted method to evaluate tear film volume, especially in dry eye diagnoses and management.Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of different methods to measure tear meniscus height accurately and repeatably.Methods: Lower TMH of 20 volunteers (26.8 ± 5.6 years) was measured by two observers (OI and OII) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), slitlamp microscope image analysis, and with a reticule at low (8x) and high (32x) magnification. TMH was also evaluated by both observers by comparing TMH to thickness of the lid margin (lid-ratio; grade 0: TMH 1/2 lid margin thickness; grade 1: 1/3; grade 2: 1/4; grade 3: 1/5; grade 4: 1/6) and to the number of eyelashes fitting in the tear meniscus. Differences between observers were analysed by paired-t-test. Differences between OCT-TMH and other methods were analysed by ANOVA, and inter-observer repeatability by intra-class-correlation-coefficient (ICC). The ability to predict OCT-TMH was calculated by receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results: There was no significant difference between OI and OII in all methods except of the eyelash-count-method (p = 0.008). For OI, TMH measured using a reticule at 8x (0.20 ± 0.05 mm) was significantly lower than OCT-TMH (0.24 ± 0.07 mm) (p = 0.032) but not at 32x (0.22 ± 0.01 mm; p = 0.435). TMH evaluated by the image software of the slitlamp (0.20 ± 0.05 mm) was significantly lower than OCT-TMH (p = 0.022). The lid-ratio-method and eyelash-count-method resulted in grades of 2.35 ± 1.22 and 2.85 ± 0.81, respectively. ROC analyses showed that only the 8x and the 32x magnification method could discriminate between normal and abnormal OCT-TMH. OCT had the best repeatability (ICC = 0.88; p < 0.001) followed by reticule using 32x magnification (ICC = 0.70; p = 0.004).Conclusion: The most reliable method to measure TMH was OCT followed by slitlamp using a reticule. TMH cannot be reliably evaluated by comparing it against lid margin thickness or number of eyelashes.

Clinical significance of contact lens related changes of ocular surface tissue observed on optical coherence images.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the real contact lens imprint into the conjunctival tissue, observed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and conjunctival staining and contact lens wearing comfort. METHODS: 17 participants (mean age = 26.6 SD ± 3.6 years; 7 females) were fitted with three different contact lenses base curves of the same silicone hydrogel custom lens type (Visell 50; Hecht Contactlinsen, Au, Germany) in a randomised order. One lens was optimally fitted according to the manufacturer's recommendation, one fitted 0.4 mm flatter and one fitted 0.4 mm steeper. After 4 h of lens wear the contact lens edge in the area of the conjunctiva was imaged nasally and temporally using OCT (Optovue iVue SD-OCT). To correct the artefact due to optical distortion with OCT, the imprint of all worn lenses was measured on a glass plate afterwards. Conjunctival staining in the limbal region after 4 h of lens wear was classified using the CCLRU Grading Scale. Comfort scoring was based on visual analog scales from 0 (very poor) to 100 (excellent). RESULTS: The mean conjunctival imprint of all contact lens edges was 32.0 ± 8.1 µm before and 7.3 ± 6.5 µm after distortion correction of the OCT images. The distortion corrected conjunctival imprint with the 0.4 mm steeper lens (11.5 ± 6.2 µm) was statistically significantly greater compared to the optimally fitted lens (6.5 ± 5.9 µm) (One-way ANOVA followed Tukey-test; p = 0.017) and greater compared to the 0.4 mm flatter lens (3.9 ± 5.3 µm) (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the optimally fitted lens and the 0.4 mm flatter lens (p = 0.209). The nasally measured imprint (11.4 ± 9.0 µm) was significantly greater than the temporally measured (3.3 ± 7.6 µm) (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant correlation between the amount of conjunctival imprint and the graded conjunctival staining (p = 0.346) or the wearer's comfort (p = 0.735). CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens edges imaged by OCT exhibited displacement artefacts. The observed conjunctival imprints are a combination of real conjunctival compression and artefacts. A deeper imprint of the contact lens into the conjunctiva caused by a steeper base curve was not related to clinically significant staining or changes in comfort after 4 h of lens wear. The observed differences between nasal and temporal imprint are likely to be caused by variations of conjunctival thickness and the shape of the underlying sclera.

Corneoscleral Topography Measured with Fourier-based Profilometry and Scheimpflug Imaging.

SIGNIFICANCE: Precise measurement of corneoscleral topography makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of anterior eye anatomy and supports the fitting process of contact lenses. Sagittal height data, determined by newer noninvasive techniques, are particularly useful for initial scleral lens selection. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement and repeatability of Fourier-based profilometry and Scheimpflug imaging, in the measurement of sagittal height and toricity of the corneoscleral region. METHODS: Minimal (Minsag), maximal (Maxsag) sagittal height, toricity (Maxsag - Minsag), and the maximum possible measurement zone diameter of 38 subjects were compared using the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP; Eagle Eye, Houten, the Netherlands) and the corneoscleral profile module of the Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) at two different sessions. Correlations between the instruments were analyzed using the Pearson coefficient. Differences between sessions and instruments were analyzed using Bland-Altman and paired t tests. RESULTS: For an equal chord length, the measurement with Pentacam was significantly greater for Minsag (344 µm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 322 to 364 µm; P < .001) and significantly greater for Maxsag (280 µm; 95% CI, 256 to 305 µm; P < .001), but significantly smaller for toricity (-63 µm; 95% CI, -95 to -31 µm; P < .001). Maximum possible measurement zone diameter with ESP (16.4 ± 1.3 mm) was significantly greater than with Pentacam (14.8 ± 1.1 mm) (P < .001). Repeated measurements from session 1 and session 2 were not significantly different for Pentacam and ESP (P = .74 and P = .64, respectively). The 95% CIs around differences indicate good repeatability for Pentacam (mean difference, -0.9 µm; 95% CI, -6.7 to 4.8 µm) and ESP (4.6 µm; -22.4 to 31.6). CONCLUSIONS: Although both instruments deliver useful data especially for the fitting of scleral and soft contact lenses, the sagittal height and the toricity measurements cannot be considered as interchangeable.

Agreement and repeatability of four different devices to measure non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT).

PURPOSE: Since tear film stability can be affected by fluorescein, the Dry Eye Workshop (DEWSII) recommended non-invasive measurement of tear breakup time (NIBUT). The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement and repeatability of four different instruments in the measurement of NIBUT. METHODS: 72 participants (mean 24.2 ± 3.6 years) were recruited for this multi-centre, cross-sectional study. NIBUT was measured three times from one eye using each of the instruments in randomized order on two separate sessions during a day, separated by at least 2 h. NIBUT was performed at three sites (Switzerland, Germany and UK) using three subjective instruments, Tearscope Plus (Keeler, Windsor, UK) (TS), Polaris (bon Optic, Lübeck, Germany) (POL), EasyTear Viewplus (Easytear, Rovereto, Italy) (ET) and the objective Keratograph 5 M (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) (KER). As the latter instrument only analyses for 24 s, all data was capped at this value. RESULTS: NIBUT measurements (average of both sessions) between the four instruments were not statistically significantly different: TS (median 10.4, range 2.0-24.0 s), POL (10.1, 1.0-24.0 s), ET (10.6, 1.0-24.0 s) and KER (11.1, 2.6-24.0 s) (p = 0.949). The objective KER measures were on average (1.2 s ± 9.6 s, 95 % confidence interval) greater than the subjective evaluations of NIBUT with the other instruments (mean difference 0.4 s ± 7.7 s, 95 % confidence interval), resulting in a higher limits of agreement. The slope was -0.08 to 0.11 indicating no bias in the difference between instruments with the magnitude of the NIBUT. Repeated measurements from the two sessions were not significantly different for TS (p = 0.584), POL (p = 0.549), ET (p = 0.701) or KER (p = 0.261). CONCLUSIONS: The four instruments evaluated for their measurement of tear stability were reasonably repeatable and give similar average results.

Lid-parallel conjunctival fold (LIPCOF) morphology imaged by optical coherence tomography and its relationship to LIPCOF grade.

PURPOSE: Lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) are a well-accepted clinical sign in dry eye diagnosis. Commonly, LIPCOF is classified by grading the number of folds observed by slit-lamp microscope. This study investigated the relationship between subjective grading scale and LIPCOF morphology imaged by optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Temporal and nasal LIPCOF of 42 subjects (mean age 27.3 ± 8.4 (SD) years; 13 M, 29 F) were observed and classified by an experienced optometrist using the Pult LIPCOF grading scale (0: no permanent, lid-parallel conjunctival fold; 1: one fold; 2: two folds, 3: three or more folds). Additionally, LIPCOF cross-sectional area (LIPCOF-A) and fold count (LIPCOF-C), as imaged by OCT (Cirrus HD; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), were analysed with ImageJ 1.50 (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij). Correlations between subjective grading and LIPCOF-A and LIPCOF-C were analysed by Spearman correlation, differences between subjective grading and LIPCOF-C were analysed by Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: For temporal and nasal sectors, mean subjective LIPCOF grade was 1.43 ± 0.86 grade units and 0.57 ± 0.80 grade units, mean LIPCOF-C was 1.67 ± 0.82 folds and 0.69 ± 0.78 folds, and mean LIPCOF-A was 0.0676 ± 0.0236mm2 and 0.0389 ± 0.0352 mm2, respectively. Subjective temporal and nasal LIPCOF grade was significantly correlated to LIPCOF-C (r = 0.610, p < 0.001 and r = 0.645, p < 0.001, respectively), and to LIPCOF-A (r = 0.612, p < 0.001 and r = 0.583, p < 0.001, respectively). LIPCOF-C was not statistical different to subjective LIPCOF grade (p = 0.07 and p = 0.239; temporal and nasal sectors, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OCT allows for better imaging of finer details of LIPCOF morphology, and especially of LIPCOF area. OCT evaluation of LIPCOF area correlated well with subjective grading and appears to be a promising objective method for LIPCOF classification.

Corneal topography with an aberrometry-topography system.

PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement between the central corneal radii and corneal eccentricity measurements generated by the new Wave Analyzer 700 Medica (WAV) compared to the Keratograph 4 (KER) and to test the repeatability of the instruments. METHODS: 20 subjects (10 male, mean age 29.1 years, range 21-50 years) were recruited from the students and staff of the Cologne School of Optometry. Central corneal radii for the flat (rc/fl) and steep (rc/st) meridian as well as corneal eccentricity for the nasal (enas), temporal (etemp), inferior (einf) and superior (esup) directions were measured using WAV and KER by one examiner in a randomized order. RESULTS: Central radii of the flat (rc/fl) and steep (rc/st) meridian measured with both instruments were statically significantly correlated (r = 0.945 and r = 0.951; p < 0.001). Comparison between the WAV and KER showed that rc/fl and rc/st measured with WAV were significantly steeper than those measured with KER (p < 0.001). Corneal eccentricities were statistically significantly correlated in all meridians (p < 0.05). Compared to KER, etemp and esup measured with WAV were greater (p < 0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences for enas and einf (p = 0.350 and p = 0.083). For the central radii, repeated measurements were not significantly different for the KER or WAV (p > 0.05). Limits of agreement (LoA) indicate a better repeatability for the KER compared to WAV. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal topography measurements captured with the WAV were strongly correlated with the KER. However, due to the differences in measured corneal radii and eccentricities, the devices cannot be used interchangeably. For corneal topography the KER demonstrated better repeatability.

Lid-Parallel Conjunctival Folds and Their Ability to Predict Dry Eye.

PURPOSE: The observation of lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) is reported to be useful in dry eye diagnoses. Around 70% of the European clinicians use this test in a dry eye clinic. This study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of LIPCOF to predict dry eye. METHODS: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) outcome, noninvasive break-up time (NIKBUT) using the Keratograph (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), and LIPCOF of 148 randomized selected patient reports (88 females; mean age=37.0±12.9 years) from 3 different sites were analyzed. Subjects were divided into dry eye and non-dry eye groups by OSDI only, named symptomatic dry eye (OSDI scores ≥15) and by a composite score (OSDI scores ≥15 and NIKBUTaverage of ≤9 sec). RESULTS: Lid-parallel conjunctival folds (temporal, nasal, Sum [=temporal+nasal]) were significantly correlated to OSDI and to NIKBUTaverage (Spearman; r>-0.185, P<0.013). NIKBUTaverage (r=-0.322; P<0.001) was significantly correlated to OSDI scores. Based on the OSDI questionnaire, 37.2% of the subjects were symptomatic and 14.7% were positive for dry eye based on the composite score. Lid-parallel conjunctival folds were a significant discriminator between healthy and dry eye subjects (P≤0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for temporal LIPCOF, nasal LIPCOF, and LIPCOF Sum were 0.716, 0.737, and 0.771, respectively, for the symptomatic dry eye group and 0.771, 0.719, and 0.798, respectively, for the composite dry eye group. CONCLUSIONS: As LIPCOF demonstrated high predictive ability of dry eye; it appears to be a promising test in the diagnoses of dry eye.

Scleral topography analysed by optical coherence tomography.

PURPOSE: A detailed evaluation of the corneo-scleral-profile (CSP) is of particular relevance in soft and scleral lenses fitting. The aim of this study was to use optical coherence tomography (OCT) to analyse the profile of the limbal sclera and to evaluate the relationship between central corneal radii, corneal eccentricity and scleral radii. METHODS: Using OCT (Optos OCT/SLO; Dunfermline, Scotland, UK) the limbal scleral radii (SR) of 30 subjects (11M, 19F; mean age 23.8±2.0SD years) were measured in eight meridians 45° apart. Central corneal radii (CR) and corneal eccentricity (CE) were evaluated using the Oculus Keratograph 4 (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Differences between SR in the meridians and the associations between SR and corneal topography were assessed. RESULTS: Median SR measured along 45° (58.0; interquartile range, 46.8-84.8mm) was significantly (p<0.001) flatter than along 0° (30.7; 24.5-44.3mm), 135° (28.4; 24.9-30.9mm), 180° (23.40; 21.3-25.4mm), 225° (25.8; 22.4-32.4mm), 270° (28.8; 25.3-33.1mm), 315° (30.0; 25.0-36.9mm), and 90° (37.1; 29.1-43.4mm). In addition, the nasal SR along 0° were significant flatter than the temporal SR along 180° (p<0.001). Central corneal radius in the flat meridian (7.83±0.26mm) and in the steep meridian (7.65±0.26mm) did not correlate with SR (p=0.186 to 0.998). There was no statistically significant correlation between corneal eccentricity and scleral radii in each meridian (p=0.422). CONCLUSIONS: With the OCT device used in this study it was possible to measure scleral radii in eight different meridians. Scleral radii are independent of corneal topography and may provide additional data useful in fitting soft and scleral contact lenses.

Influence of Conjunctival Folds on Calculated Tear Meniscus Volume Along the Lower Eyelid.

PURPOSE: In calculating tear meniscus volume (TMV), tear meniscus height (TMH), radius (TMR) and cross-sectional area (TMA) are usually measured at the center of the lower lid margin, but lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOFs) are known to influence the tear meniscus regularity. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of LIPCOFs on TMA measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and consequently, the calculated tear meniscus volume (TMV). METHODS: Using OCT (Cirrus-HD; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), the TMH, TMR and TMA in 42 subjects (13M, 29F; mean age 27.3 SD±8.4 years) were measured directly below the pupil center, plus at temporal and nasal locations perpendicularly below the limbus, where LIPCOFs were also evaluated and graded. TMV for the different locations was calculated. Correlations between LIPCOFs and the tear meniscus parameters were analyzed using the Spearman Rank-Order coefficients. Differences between tear meniscus parameters at the different locations were evaluated by the paired t-test. RESULTS: Central TMV (5.30±1.42 x10(-2)µl/mm) was significantly positively correlated to LIPCOF sum (grade 2.4±1.2) (r=0.422; P<.05). The calculated temporal TMV was greater by 0.53x10(-2)µl/mm compared to the central TMV (P=.037), while there was no significant difference in tear volume between the other locations. CONCLUSIONS: Using OCT it was possible to investigate the influence of LIPCOFs on TMH, TMR, and for the first time on TMA, at central and paracentral positions along the lower lid margin. The presence of LICPOF results in an irregularity of tear meniscus with a difference in the amount of predicted tear volume while measuring TMH or TMR at the different locations.

Time course of changes in tear meniscus radius and blink rate after instillation of artificial tears.

PURPOSE: Using a novel digital meniscometer (PDM), alterations in tear meniscus radius (TMR) were measured simultaneously with blink rate (BR) following the instillation of artificial tears. METHODS: Central TMR and BR of 22 subjects (11 male and 11 female; mean age, 24.3 ± 2.6 SD years) were measured at baseline, and 0, 1, 5, 10, and 30 minutes after instillation of an artificial tear containing hydroxypropyl-guar and glycol (SYS) or saline (SAL). A dose of 35 µL was applied in one eye in a randomized order with a washout period between each drop. RESULTS: For SAL, compared to baseline TMR (0.33 ± 0.08 mm), TMR significantly increased with drop instillation (1.55 ± 0.69 mm) and at 1 minute (0.66 ± 0.36 mm; P < 0.05), but returned to baseline after 5 minutes. For SYS, TMR (0.32 ± 0.07 mm) remained significantly increased after application (1.62 ± 0.81 mm), and at 1 minute (0.81 ± 0.43 mm) and 5 minutes (0.39 ± 0.08 mm; P < 0.05). Compared to baseline BR with SAL (14.8 ± 7.7) and SYS (14.9 ± 9.4), values were significantly increased upon drop instillation (22.5 ± 11.8; 21.3 ± 11.8; P < 0.05), but returned to baseline after 1 minute. Dry eye symptoms were correlated with baseline BR (r = 0.550, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that PDM can detect changes in TMR following instillation of artificial tears. Difference in residence time reflects the different viscosity of each drop. An overload with a large drop may result in an initially increased BR.

The relationship between tear meniscus regularity and conjunctival folds.

PURPOSE: To investigate the capability of a new portable digital meniscometer (PDM) to measure tear meniscus radius (TMR) and tear meniscus height (TMH) at different locations along the lower lid and to evaluate relationships between tear meniscus regularity and the degree of lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOFs). METHODS: Using the PDM, the TMR and TMH of 42 subjects were measured at three locations along the lower lid of one eye: central, perpendicularly below the pupil center (TMR-C, TMH-C), and temporal (TMR-T, TMH-T) and nasal (TMR-N, TMH-N), perpendicularly below the limbus. Nasal and temporal LIPCOF grades were recorded. Correlations between the measurements were analyzed using the Pearson coefficient (or Spearman rank in nonparametric data), and the differences were evaluated by paired t tests or analysis of variance and post hoc Fisher least significant difference test. RESULTS: Temporal TMR was 0.041 mm flatter (p = 0.002) and TMH-T was 0.063 mm higher (p < 0.001), whereas TMR-N was 0.026 mm flatter (p = 0.038) and TMH-N was 0.046 mm higher (p < 0.001) than TMR-C and TMH-C. Temporal LIPCOF grades were significantly correlated to temporal alterations in TMH (r = 0.590; p < 0.001) and TMR (r = 0.530; p < 0.001), and nasal LIPCOF grades were significantly correlated to nasal alterations in TMH (r = 0.492; p = 0.001) and TMR (r = 0.350; p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The PDM is able to noninvasively detect significant differences in TMR and TMH along the lower lid. The flatter TMR and higher TMH at the nasal and temporal locations are associated with increased LIPCOF. Because increased LIPCOF scores may affect tear film disruption along the lower lid, measuring TMR and TMH at the central position below the pupil may provide the best intersubject reliability.

Comparison of a new portable digital meniscometer and optical coherence tomography in tear meniscus radius measurement.

PURPOSE: Non-invasive measurement of tear meniscus radius (TMR) is useful in the assessment of tear volume for dry eye diagnosis. This study investigates the agreement between a new, portable, slit-lamp mounted, digital meniscometer (PDM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the measurement of human TMR. METHODS: Images of the tear meniscus at the centre of the lower lid of 30 normal subjects (8M, 22F; mean age 27.5 SD ± 9.6 years) were taken using the PDM and the OCT. On the PDM and OCT images, TMR was measured using imagej 1.46b software. The meniscus on the OCT images was subdivided vertically into three equal sections and the radius calculated for each: bottom (BTMR), centre (CTMR) and top (TTMR). The relationship between PDM and OCT measurements was analysed using Spearman's rank coefficient, and differences between PDM and OCT subsection measurements were evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Tear meniscus radius measured with the PDM (0.25 ± 0.06 mm) and OCT (0.29 ± 0.09 mm) was significantly correlated (r = 0.675; p < 0.001). The mean differences between TMR using the PDM and the subsections from OCT showed that TMR measured with PDM was greater for BTMR (0.07 mm; CI 0.05-0.10; p < 0.001), similar for CTMR (-0.01 mm; CI -0.04 to 0.02; p = 0.636) and steeper for TTMR (-0.07 mm; CI -0.10 to -0.04; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Portable digital meniscometer and OCT measurements of the TMR are significantly correlated, suggesting that the new PDM is a useful surrogate for OCT in this respect. The PDM appears to measure the radius of the central section of the tear meniscus.

A new portable digital meniscometer.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were (i) to develop a new portable slit-lamp mounted digital meniscometer (PDM) and (ii) to test its accuracy and repeatability compared to the existing Yokoi et al. videomeniscometer (VM). METHODS: We developed a novel application for an iPod or iPhone, which created an illuminated target of parallel black and white bands. This was used as a portable device with which to perform reflective meniscometry. The medians of three consecutive measurements on five glass capillaries (internal radii, 0.100 to 0.505 mm) were compared between VM and PDM at two different sessions. Also, the central lower tear meniscus radius (TMR) in 20 normal subjects (10 males and 10 females; mean [SD] age, 32.3 [9.3] years) was measured using both techniques. Correlations between the instruments were analyzed using the Pearson coefficient. Differences between sessions and instruments were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots, coefficient of repeatability, and paired t-tests. RESULTS: The PDM and VM were accurate in vitro (95% confidence interval [CI] of difference: PDM -0.0134 to +0.0074 mm, p = 0.468; VM -0.0282 to + 0.0226 mm; p = 0.775) and reproducible between sessions (95% coefficient of repeatability, 0.019 and 0.018, respectively). The mean difference between the PDM and VM in vitro was 0.0002 mm (95% CI, -0.0252 to + 0.0256; p = 0.984). In human subjects, mean (SD) TMR measured with the PDM (0.34 [0.10] mm) and VM (0.36 [0.11] mm) was significantly correlated (r = 0.940; p < 0.001), and there was no statistically significant difference between the measured TMR of the instruments (p = 0.124). CONCLUSIONS: This new slit-lamp mounted digital meniscometer produces accurate and reliable measurements and provides similar values for tear meniscus radius, in human studies, to the existing VM. The instrument is suitable for use in both research and clinical practice.