Altered serum levels of adipokines and insulin in probable Alzheimer's disease.

Cerebral hypometabolism of glucose, weight loss, and decreased food intake are characteristic features of sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD). A systematic study on the serum levels of adipokines and insulin, the major hormones regulating energy metabolism, food intake, and body weight, in sporadic AD is necessary. The present study compares the serum levels of leptin, adiponectin, and insulin, measured by commercially available immuno-assay kits, between controls and sporadic AD subjects. The results show a conspicuous decrease in the level of leptin, a dramatic rise in the level of adiponectin, and also a statistically significant increase in insulin level, in the blood of AD subjects, with respect to controls. The changes in the serum levels of adiponectin and insulin in AD are positively correlated with the severity of dementia. Likewise, the serum level of leptin in AD subjects is negatively correlated with the degree of dementia. The changes in the levels of adipokines and insulin have implications in the amyloid pathology, neurodegeneration, and hypometabolism of glucose existing in the AD brain.

Serum Homocysteine, Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulphate and Lipoprotein (a) in Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VAD) are the major forms of dementia affecting elderly people, in which the levels of many metabolites are altered in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum. These metabolites could be risk factors or potential biomarkers, but the significance of some of these are not clearly understood in the context of the disease pathogenesis. In the present study serum levels of homocysteine, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S) and lipoprotein (a) or Lp(a) have been measured by ELISA using commercial kits in AD (n = 40), VAD (n = 40) and age matched control subjects (n = 40). The data are compared by ANOVA and post-hoc analysis. The serum homocysteine is markedly elevated compared to control both in AD and VAD subjects, but to a significantly higher extent in the latter. Lp(a) is increased in the serum of VAD subjects only compared to control. Likewise, serum DHEA-S level is lowered in AD but not in VAD compared to control. The analysis of the present data and those published by others suggest that alterations in homocysteine and Lp(a) in serum are indicators of vascular pathology in AD or VAD, while the lowering of serum DHEA-S is a consequence of AD pathology.

Portal pressure response to losartan compared with propranolol in patients with cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES: Losartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, has portal hypotensive effects. This study evaluates the effect of losartan on portal pressure after 14 days and compares it with that of propranolol. METHODS: A total of 39 individuals with cirrhosis were randomized into two groups of 19 and 20 patients each and were treated with losartan and propranolol, respectively. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured at baseline and on day 14 of therapy. Responders to therapy had hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction of >/=20% of baseline value. RESULTS: With losartan, 15 of 19 (78.94%) patients were responders and with propranolol, nine of 20 (45%) patients were responders (p < 0.05). Although the hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction (i.e., percentage from baseline) with losartan (26.74 +/- 21.7%) was higher than with propranolol (14.52 +/- 32%), the difference was not significant. The reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient with losartan was contributed mainly by a significant drop of wedge hepatic venous pressure from 32.42 +/- 6.61 mm of Hg to 28.31 +/- 5.09 mm of Hg (p < 0.05) compared to that with propranolol, which was from 34.55 +/- 5.41 mm of Hg to 32.75 +/- 8.13 mm of Hg (p > 0.05). Responders among alcohol-abusing patients were significantly higher with losartan (81.8%) compared to those on propranolol (27.2%; p < 0.05). In the losartan group, all seven nonascitic cirrhotic individuals, as compared with two of five in the propranolol group, responded to the drugs. During the study, no significant side effects were observed in either group (who were not receiving diuretics) or in follow-up with diuretics. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan is as effective as propranolol in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients who are not receiving diuretics. Losartan is also superior to propranolol for achieving target level hepatic venous gradient for prevention of variceal bleeding in nonascitic and alcohol-abusing cirrhotic patients.

Occurrence of hepatopulmonary syndrome in Budd-Chiari syndrome and the role of venous decompression.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) has been predominantly detected in cirrhotic patients and rarely in patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of HPS in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (only anecdotal reports available) and evaluate the role of venous decompression in its reversal. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive cases of Budd-Chiari syndrome without primary cardiopulmonary disease were investigated by air contrast echocardiography and arterial blood gas analysis. Venous decompression (e.g., by balloon cavoplasty) was attempted when feasible. RESULTS: Eight cases (27.6%) of HPS and 9 cases (31.0%) with positive contrast echocardiography but unimpaired oxygenation were detected. Duration of disease was longer (P = 0.026) among those with positive contrast echocardiography. Cavoplasty reversed 4 of 5 cases of HPS and 2 of 2 cases with positive contrast echocardiography alone. Venous decompression by drainage of amebic liver abscess (which was compressing hepatic venous outflow) also reversed 1 case of HPS. HPS was relieved by venous decompression in 5 of 6 cases. CONCLUSIONS: HPS developed in a substantial fraction of our patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, with positive contrast echocardiography occurring mainly in the benign, slowly progressing variety. Venous decompression showed promise in reversing such cases.