Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Cell Biol ; 34(14): 2566-80, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24797073

ABSTRACT

At the Tcrb locus, Vß-to-Jß rearrangement is permitted by the 12/23 rule but is not observed in vivo, a restriction termed the "beyond 12/23" rule (B12/23 rule). Previous work showed that Vß recombination signal sequences (RSSs) do not recombine with Jß RSSs because Jß RSSs are crippled for either nicking or synapsis. This result raised the following question: how can crippled Jß RSSs recombine with Dß RSSs? We report here that the nicking of some Jß RSSs can be substantially stimulated by synapsis with a 3'Dß1 partner RSS. This result helps to reconcile disagreement in the field regarding the impact of synapsis on nicking. Furthermore, our data allow for the classification of Tcrb RSSs into two major categories: those that nick quickly and those that nick slowly in the absence of a partner. Slow-nicking RSSs can be stimulated to nick more efficiently upon synapsis with an appropriate B12/23 partner, and our data unexpectedly suggest that fast-nicking RSSs can be inhibited for nicking upon synapsis with an inappropriate partner. These observations indicate that the RAG proteins exert fine control over every step of V(D)J cleavage and support the hypothesis that initial RAG binding can occur on RSSs with either 12- or 23-bp spacers (12- or 23-RSSs, respectively).


Subject(s)
Chromosome Pairing , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Genes, T-Cell Receptor beta , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , V(D)J Recombination , Animals , DNA Breaks, Single-Stranded , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , HMGB1 Protein/genetics , HMGB1 Protein/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Humans
2.
J Exp Med ; 207(13): 2809-16, 2010 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21115692

ABSTRACT

V(D)J recombination assembles antigen receptor genes in a well-defined order during lymphocyte development. This sequential process has long been understood in the context of the accessibility model, which states that V(D)J recombination is regulated by controlling the ability of the recombination machinery to gain access to its chromosomal substrates. Indeed, many features of "open" chromatin correlate with V(D)J recombination, and promoters and enhancers have been strongly implicated in creating a recombinase-accessible configuration in neighboring chromatin. An important prediction of the accessibility model is that cis-elements and transcription control binding of the recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 proteins to their DNA targets. However, this prediction has not been tested directly. In this study, we use mutant Tcra and Tcrb alleles to demonstrate that enhancers control RAG1 binding globally at Jα or Dß/Jß gene segments, that promoters and transcription direct RAG1 binding locally, and that RAG1 binding can be targeted in the absence of RAG2. These findings reveal important features of the genetic mechanisms that regulate RAG binding and provide a direct confirmation of the accessibility model.


Subject(s)
Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Genes, Immunoglobulin/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Recombination, Genetic , Acetylation , Animals , Binding, Competitive , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , DNA/genetics , DNA/metabolism , Female , Gene Rearrangement , Genotype , HMGB1 Protein/genetics , HMGB1 Protein/metabolism , Histones/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Protein Binding , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , VDJ Recombinases/metabolism
3.
Mol Cell Biol ; 25(16): 7323-32, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16055740

ABSTRACT

We have previously formulated a list of approximately 2,000 RNA octamers as putative exonic splicing enhancers (PESEs) based on a statistical comparison of human exonic and nonexonic sequences (X. H. Zhang and L. A. Chasin, Genes Dev. 18:1241-1250, 2004). When inserted into a poorly spliced test exon, all eight tested octamers stimulated splicing, a result consistent with their identification as exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs). Here we present a much more stringent test of the validity of this list of PESEs. Twenty-two naturally occurring examples of nonoverlapping PESEs or PESE clusters were identified in six mammalian exons; five of the six exons tested are constitutively spliced. Each of the 22 individual PESEs or PESE clusters was disrupted by site-directed mutagenesis, usually by a single-base substitution. Eighteen of the 22 disruptions (82%) resulted in decreased splicing efficiency. In contrast, 24 control mutations had little or no effect on splicing. This high rate of success suggests that most PESEs function as ESEs in their natural context. Like most exons, these exons contain several PESEs. Since knocking out any one of several could produce a severalfold decrease in splicing efficiency, we conclude that there is little redundancy among ESEs in an exon and that they must work in concert to optimize splicing.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation , RNA Splicing , Alternative Splicing , Base Sequence , Cell Line , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Exons , Genetic Techniques , Humans , Models, Genetic , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutagenesis, Site-Directed , Mutation , Phenotype , Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA/metabolism , RNA Precursors/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...