ABSTRACT
This study examines the impact of a newly developed structured training on Singapore paramedics' psychological comfort before the implementation of a prehospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) protocol. Following a before and after study design, the paramedics underwent a self-administered questionnaire to assess their psychological comfort level applying the TOR protocol, 22 months before and one month after a 3-h structured training session. The questionnaire addressed five domains: sociocultural attitudes on resuscitation and TOR, multi-tasking, feelings towards resuscitation and TOR, interactions with colleagues and bystanders and informing survivors. Overall psychological comfort total (PCT) scores and domain-specific scores were compared using the paired t-test with higher scores representing greater comfort. Ninety-six of the 345 eligible paramedics responded. There was no statistically significant change in the mean PCT scores at baseline and post-training; however, the "feelings towards resuscitation and TOR" domain improved by 4.77% (95% CI 1.42 to 8.13 and p = 0.006) and the multi-tasking domain worsened by 4.11% (95% CI -7.82 to -0.41 and p = 0.030). While the structured training did not impact on the overall psychological comfort levels, it led to improvements in the feelings of paramedics towards resuscitation and TOR. Challenges remain in improving paramedics' psychological comfort levels towards TOR.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Medical Services , Allied Health Personnel , Humans , Singapore , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Paramedics' decision to terminate field resuscitation without a physician present may depend on personal and external factors. This study investigates factors associated with paramedic psychological comfort with termination of resuscitation (TOR) to inform future training. METHODS: We administered an anonymous survey to all practicing paramedics in a large urban Asian Emergency Medical Services system where formal TOR training had not yet been conducted and field TOR was not routinely applied. The survey assessed psychological comfort using the validated Psychological Comfort Total (PCT) scale (summed score of 28 items, with higher scores representing greater comfort). We examined scores associated with four personal (prior resolution of personal loss, knowledge of survival probability, religious affiliation and experience with death pronouncements) and two external (location of patient and perceived trust of family) factors. Data were entered into Excel and analyzed by t-tests and ANOVA. RESULTS: Response rate was 73.6% (254/345). Respondents were 30.3 years (mean, SD 7.1) with 7.2 years (mean, SD 5.54) of practice experience. Over 60% had been involved in 6 or more field death pronouncements in the prior 12 months. Higher PCT scores were associated with prior resolution of personal loss and knowledge of survival probability. Lower PCT scores were associated with patient location in a public place and perceived family lack of trust. PCT scores were not associated with paramedic religious affiliation or number of prior death pronouncements. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedic psychological comfort with field death pronouncement is associated with personal and external factors. Since paramedic comfort is important for protocol adoption, TOR education should target not only knowledge, but also public arena management, communication skills for engaging with families, and help paramedics resolve prior personal loss.