In-stent restenosis is associated with proliferative skin healing and specific immune and endothelial cell profiles: results from the RACHEL trial.

Introduction: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a major challenge in interventional cardiology. Both ISR and excessive skin healing are aberrant hyperplasic responses, which may be functionally related. However, the cellular component underlying ISR remains unclear, especially regarding vascular homeostasis. Recent evidence suggest that novel immune cell populations may be involved in vascular repair and damage, but their role in ISR has not been explored. The aims of this study is to analyze (i) the association between ISR and skin healing outcomes, and (ii) the alterations in vascular homeostasis mediators in ISR in univariate and integrative analyses. Methods: 30 patients with ≥1 previous stent implantation with restenosis and 30 patients with ≥1 stent without restenosis both confirmed in a second angiogram were recruited. Cellular mediators were quantified in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. Skin healing outcomes were analyzed after two consecutive biopsies. Results: Hypertrophic skin healing was more frequent in ISR patients (36.7%) compared to those ISR-free (16.7%). Patients with ISR were more likely to develop hypertrophic skin healing patterns (OR 4.334 [95% CI 1.044-18.073], p=0.033), even after correcting for confounders. ISR was associated with decreased circulating angiogenic T-cells (p=0.005) and endothelial progenitor cells (p<0.001), whereas CD4+CD28null and detached endothelial cells counts were higher (p<0.0001 and p=0.006, respectively) compared to their ISR-free counterparts. No differences in the frequency of monocyte subsets were found, although Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme expression was increased (non-classical: p<0.001; and intermediate: p<0.0001) in ISR. Despite no differences were noted in Low-Density Granulocytes, a relative increase in the CD16- compartment was observed in ISR (p=0.004). An unsupervised cluster analysis revealed the presence of three profiles with different clinical severity, unrelated to stent types or traditional risk factors. Conclusion: ISR is linked to excessive skin healing and profound alterations in cellular populations related to vascular repair and endothelial damage. Distinct cellular profiles can be distinguished within ISR, suggesting that different alterations may uncover different ISR clinical phenotypes.

P2Y12 platelet reactivity after thrombolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Thrombolysis, as reperfusion therapy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), induces a pro-thrombotic status with enhanced platelet activity; this study aims to evaluate P2Y12 platelet reactivity and response to clopidogrel in the post-thrombolysis scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational, prospective study, including consecutive patients with elective angiography after thrombolytic therapy for STEMI. Every patient received antiplatelet therapy with loading doses of 250 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel on admission followed by 100mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel daily. P2Y12-dependent platelet reactivity (expressed in P2Y12-Reaction Units, PRU) was assessed with VerifyNow® device on admission, daily after thrombolysis and pre-angiography. RESULTS: 41 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median time between thrombolysis and angiography was 2,5 days (IQR 1,8-4,1). Post-treatment platelet reactivity (PPR) showed poor correlation with time on clopidogrel treatment (r2=0.04) and reached a maximum value of 274 ± 84 PRU during the first 24h after thrombolysis (Day +1 determination). After this, values showed a progressive reduction until the point of angiography (249 ± 82 PRU), without significant differences between consecutive time-points (p=0,549). Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) assessed as a percentage of P2Y12 receptor blockage was poor, increasing gradually from 0 ± 4% on admission to 11 ± 6% the day of the angiography (p=0,001). 71,4% of patients showed PPR ≥ 208 PRU during angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet reactivity, as assessed by post-treatment P2Y12 mediated reactivity, is heightened after thrombolytic therapy during STEMI management. In this scenario, standard doses of clopidogrel did not achieve significant inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet reactivity.