Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Pediatr Phys Ther ; 35(4): 430-437, 2023 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37747978

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) into Greek. METHODS: The PBS was forward-back translated and evaluated for content equivalence. The Greek PBS (PBSGR) was administered to children with movement impairments by 2 pediatric physical therapists. The scale was readministered to the same children after 3 weeks (test-retest reliability) and to children with typical development for discriminant validity. The 1-minute walk test was administered to test the scale's concurrent validity. RESULTS: Psychometric testing was completed on 26 children with movement impairments. The scale had excellent interrater and test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Moderate correlation was observed between PBSGR and 1-minute walk. Children with movement impairment had significantly lower PBSGR scores than children with typical development. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable reliability, concurrent validity, and discriminant validity were observed for the PBSGR.


Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Physical Therapists , Humans , Child , Greece , Reproducibility of Results , Movement
2.
Physiother Res Int ; 28(4): e2032, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37463062

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Negative attitudes towards disability amongst healthcare professionals endanger social inclusion of people with disabilities (PwD). This study aimed to investigate the attitude of undergraduate healthcare students of various disciplines towards PwD, including specific aspects of their attitude. METHODS: We assessed the attitudes of university students, including physiotherapy, speech therapy, nursing, social work and medical students, through the Greek Interaction with Disabled Person Scale (IDPS) in a survey. Data were analysed using a two-step clustering technique. RESULTS: Four hundred-eighty undergraduate healthcare students (21.4 ± 5.3 years-old; 135 males, 345 females) were recruited. Two-step cluster analysis identified three homogenous subgroups labelled Least positive attitude (42.3%), Moderately positive attitude (26.9%), and Most positive attitude (30.8%) groups. Τhe main differences in healthcare students' attitudes between the three distinct groups appeared to be in feelings of sympathy, fear and susceptibility towards disability, suggesting that these aspects of attitude needed to be primarily addressed. Results also revealed that females, being in higher semester/year of studies, having completed a clinical module with PwD and having frequent contact with PwD were related to more positive attitudes. CONCLUSION: Taking into account that the majority of the healthcare students' sample yielded least and moderately positive attitudes, towards PwD, further actions should be taken for promoting more positive attitudes towards disability. A social model in teaching to increase student's awareness of PwD and skills to work with these people, having PwD themselves teaching such modules, focussing on positive experiences and reminding the students of the benefits of having positive attitudes towards PwD, as well as promoting ways to increase the contact of healthcare students with PwD (such as teaching in co-operation with organisations of PwD or finding alternative clinical placements with PwD), can be beneficial in promoting more positive attitudes towards disability.

3.
Physiotherapy ; 119: 1-16, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36696699

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore the effect of progressive resistance exercise (PRE) on impairment, activity and participation of people with cerebral palsy (CP). Also, to determine which programme parameters provide the most beneficial effects. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases searched from the earliest available time. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) implementing PRE as an intervention in people with cerebral palsy were included. STUDIES APPRAISAL & SYNTHESIS METHODS: Methodological quality of trials was assessed with the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were completed. RESULTS: We included 20 reports of 16 RCTs (n = 504 participants). Results demonstrated low certainty evidence that PRE improved muscle strength (pooled standardised mean difference (SMD)= 0.59 (95%CI: 0.16-1.01; I²=70%). This increase in muscle strength was maintained an average of 11 weeks after training stopped. Τhere was also moderate certainty evidence that it is inconclusive whether PRE has a small effect on gross motor function (SMD= 0.14 (95%CI: -0.09 to 0.36; I²=0%) or participation (SMD= 0.26 (95%CIs: -0.02 to 0.54; I²=0%). When PRE was compared with other therapy there were no between-group differences. Meta-regression demonstrated no effect of PRE intensity or training volume (frequency x total duration) on muscle strength (p > 0.5). No serious adverse events were reported. There is lack of evidence of the effectiveness of PRE in adults and non-ambulatory people with CP. CONCLUSIONS: PRE is safe and increases muscle strength in young people with CP, which is maintained after training stops. The increase in muscle strength is unrelated to the PRE intensity or dose. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Resistance Training , Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Resistance Training/methods , Exercise , Muscle Strength/physiology , Muscles , Quality of Life
4.
J Phys Ther Sci ; 34(11): 745-751, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36337219

ABSTRACT

[Purpose] To describe the functional activity and the communication-social ability levels of youths with developmental disabilities and to determine whether demographic factors predict these levels. [Participants and Methods] A mixed, observational and qualitative, study in which parents of students with developmental disabilities were interviewed based on the WeeFIM questions. Both quantitative and qualitative data were analysed. [Results] Data were collected for 30 youths with mild to severe developmental disabilities with mean age 18.5 ± 2.7 years (19 males). Mean WeeFIM total score was 106.2 ± 10.9, indicating relatively high functional and communication-social ability. No significant difference was observed for the total WeeFIM score between males and females and between adolescents and young adults with developmental disabilities. Main themes emerged from the interviews were: Difficulties with smooth and stable walking, transfers to/from bathtub and stairs. Also, youths are expressing a need for independence in self-care, while relationships with their peers are difficult and problems are primarily solved with help from their parents. [Conclusion] Despite the high functional and communication-social ability levels of a group of youths with developmental disabilities, parents revealed that youths had certain difficulties. Therapy should address such difficulties to promote independence and participation of these young people in the community.

5.
Disabil Rehabil ; 44(13): 3196-3203, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33242287

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To explore the construct validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale (IDPS) amongst healthcare students. METHODS: Greek IDPS factors were extracted and confirmed by Analysis of Moment Structures. Measurement invariance for the group of students completing a clinical module with people with disabilities was also evaluated. The scale was distributed twice, 3 weeks apart (test-retest reliability) to sample. Greek IDPS scores amongst students with frequent contact with people with disabilities were compared with those with infrequent contact (discriminant validity). RESULTS: 327 healthcare students (21.25 ± 4.3 years, 118 males) participated. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 6 factors explaining 55.66% of total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit of the model (AGFI = 0.95 > 0.90, RMSEA = 0.07 < 0.08, CFI = 0.95 ≥ 0.90, SRMR = 0.00 < 0.08). An adequate fit for the students completing a clinical practice module was observed. The scale's test-retest reliability and internal consistency were excellent; ICC(2,1)=0.86 (CIs:0.82-0.89) and Cronbach's α = 0.87, respectively. Statistically significant differences between the two student groups were yielded; students with frequent contact with people with disabilities had lower scores (mean difference: -4.5; CI: -6.6 to -2.4), suggesting that they were significantly more comfortable with people with disabilities than the students with infrequent contact. CONCLUSION: The Greek IDPS provided sufficient validity and reliability evidence for evaluating healthcare students' perceptions and attitudes towards people with disabilities.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Greek IDPS demonstrated sufficient validity and reliability evidence to assess the Greek-speaking healthcare students' perceptions and attitudes towards people with disabilitiesCompleting a clinical module working with people with disabilities is not enough to produce adequately positive attitudes in Greek-speaking undergraduate healthcare students. Therefore, faculties need to organize further actions, such as lectures by people with disabilities, students' role play, and discussions or events in co-operation with people with disabilities.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Students , Delivery of Health Care , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Male , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Cureus ; 14(12): e32317, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36628046

ABSTRACT

Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the healthcare system and the practice of physiotherapists. Telerehabilitation is an alternative method of delivering physiotherapy services. The aim of this study was to investigate physiotherapists' knowledge, beliefs, and willingness to use telerehabilitation in Greece during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods In this cross-sectional study, Greek physiotherapists completed an online survey between January and February 2022. A questionnaire was distributed via the Panhellenic Physiotherapy Association (PSF). The questionnaire involved 26 items on demographic background, use of technology, overall perceptions, the experience of telerehabilitation, and their opinion on the future of telerehabilitation. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Patras, Greece. Results Participants in this study were 213 physiotherapists (female 57.7%; mean age 39.84±8 years). Most physiotherapists (n=118; 55.4%) were working in a private clinic in the areas of outpatient orthopedics, geriatrics, and neurorehabilitation. Overall, most participants (55%) reported increased use of telerehabilitation strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 130 physiotherapists (n=61.3%) believed that telerehabilitation may be beneficial as a supplementary way of patient management. Greek physiotherapists made use of low-cost and easily accessible digital technologies, such as mobile phones and online meeting tools (e.g., Skype, Zoom). Although most physiotherapists (79.8%) reported that they wanted to receive more information about digital technology and telerehabilitation, only 42.1% of them did intend to work remotely after the pandemic. Conclusion Most of the participants were willing to deliver physiotherapy via telerehabilitation. Specific education and training programs need to be provided to physiotherapists during and after the pandemic. Healthcare managers should consider the use of telerehabilitation and design guidelines and policies to manage telerehabilitation practices in Greece.

7.
Disabil Rehabil ; 43(7): 988-995, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31340137

ABSTRACT

AIM: Cross-cultural adaptation of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale (IDPS) into Greek. METHODS: The IDPS was forward and back-translated by two bilingual physiotherapists and a Greek-English translator, respectively. Greek-speaking health professionals provided modifications in order to develop the final version of the Scale. Health professionals filled in the Greek version of the IDPS and the Caring Behaviors Inventory (for criterion validity). The factors of the Greek IDPS were extracted as well. After 8-10 days, the scale was re-distributed to the same health professionals (test-retest reliability) and to a general population sample (discriminant validity). RESULTS: Eighty-seven health professionals (36 ± 7.6 years) and 80 general population participants (44 ± 11.6 years) participated. There was a trend for the Greek IDPS variability to predict the variability of the Caring Behaviors Inventory (r2 = 0.05; p = 0.054), but the coefficient of determination was low. An explanatory factor analysis extracted four factors explaining 66.66% of the total variance, confirmed by reliability analysis. The health care professionals had a significantly lower score than the general population in the Greek IDPS (mean difference: -11.0; confidence interval: -7.3 to -14.7), indicating familiarisation with the management of people with disability. The scale reliability and internal consistency were excellent; ICC(2,1) = 0.92 (confidence interval: 0.87-0.95) and Cronbach's α = 0.96 respectively. No ceiling or floor effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial validity and reliability were observed for the Greek IDPS to assess Greek health professionals' attitudes towards people with disabilities.Implications for rehabilitationThe Greek IDPS version was shown to be comprehensible, and has demonstrated a sufficient amount of validity and reliability for assessing the perceptions and attitudes of Greek health professionals towards people with disabilities.Exploring attitudes towards people with disabilities in Greek-speaking populations, especially health professionals, with a scale such as the Greek IDPS is very important as it can help promote positive changes in approaches towards disability.


Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Disabled Persons , Greece , Humans , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 29(6): 1841-1849, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32809119

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-Child questionnaire is one of the frequently child-friendly measures used in pediatric studies. The aim of this study was to transculturally adapt the Greek version of KOOS-Child and evaluate its clinimetric properties in children with knee disorders. METHODS: Children visiting the Outpatients Orthopaedic Clinic of a Greek Paediatric General Hospital were considered eligible if they were aged 8-14 years, had a knee soft tissue injury and associated physical limitations. The transcultural adaptation was based on a multistage backward translation approach. Participants completed the KOOS-Child at their first visit to the orthopedic specialist (baseline), 2 weeks and 3 months after baseline. Content validity of the KOOS-Child was evaluated using general QoL measures (KIDSCREEN and Kid-KINDL) and construct validity was explored by correlating relevant items. Responsiveness was evaluated according to the children's response on the given orthopeadic treatment. RESULTS: Sample consisted of 59 children (30 males), aged: 11 ± 1.8 years. The KOOS-Child showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's a: 0.80-0.96). Adequate convergent validity with > 75% relevant a priori hypotheses was confirmed. Construct validity was moderate to strong (Pearson's r correlations between related KOOS and Kid-KINDL subdimensions: 0.54-0.62). KOOS and KIDSCREEN subdimensions correlations were fair (Pearson's r correlations: 0.32-0.65). KOOS-Child's diagnostic accuracy was high. Factor analysis extracted height factors accounting for 76.15% of the total variance, confirmed by the scree plot. Responsiveness was moderate to high with Cohen's d from 0.6 to 1.4. CONCLUSION: The Greek version of the KOOS-Child demonstrated excellent internal consistency, good construct validity, diagnostic accuracy and interpretability as well as good responsiveness. The measure could be used across Greek children with orthopaedic knee problems. Generalisability of findings is limited due to the relatively limited cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Subject(s)
Knee Injuries/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Pediatrics/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adolescent , Child , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Greece , Humans , Knee Joint , Male , Orthopedics/standards , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Translations
9.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 11: CD013114, 2020 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33202482

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cerebral palsy is the most common physical disability in childhood. Mechanically assisted walking training can be provided with or without body weight support to enable children with cerebral palsy to perform repetitive practice of complex gait cycles. It is important to examine the effects of mechanically assisted walking training to identify evidence-based treatments to improve walking performance. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of mechanically assisted walking training compared to control for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy 3 to 18 years of age. SEARCH METHODS: In January 2020, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, six other databases, and two trials registers. We handsearched conference abstracts and checked reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs, including cross-over trials, comparing any type of mechanically assisted walking training (with or without body weight support) with no walking training or the same dose of overground walking training in children with cerebral palsy (classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] Levels I to IV) 3 to 18 years of age. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: This review includes 17 studies with 451 participants (GMFCS Levels I to IV; mean age range 4 to 14 years) from outpatient settings. The duration of the intervention period (4 to 12 weeks) ranged widely, as did intensity of training in terms of both length (15 minutes to 40 minutes) and frequency (two to five times a week) of sessions. Six studies were funded by grants, three had no funding support, and eight did not report information on funding. Due to the nature of the intervention, all studies were at high risk of performance bias. Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support versus no walking training Four studies (100 participants) assessed this comparison. Compared to no walking, mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support increased walking speed (mean difference [MD] 0.05 meter per second [m/s] [change scores], 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03 to 0.07; 1 study, 10 participants; moderate-quality evidence) as measured by the Biodex Gait Trainer 2™ (Biodex, Shirley, NY, USA) and improved gross motor function (standardized MD [SMD] 1.30 [postintervention scores], 95% CI 0.49 to 2.11; 2 studies, 60 participants; low-quality evidence) postintervention. One study (30 participants) reported no adverse events (low-quality evidence). No study measured participation or quality of life. Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support versus the same dose of overground walking training Two studies (55 participants) assessed this comparison. Compared to the same dose of overground walking, mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support increased walking speed (MD 0.25 m/s [change or postintervention scores], 95% CI 0.13 to 0.37; 2 studies, 55 participants; moderate-quality evidence) as assessed by the 6-minute walk test or Vicon gait analysis. It also improved gross motor function (MD 11.90% [change scores], 95% CI 2.98 to 20.82; 1 study, 35 participants; moderate-quality evidence) as assessed by the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and participation (MD 8.20 [change scores], 95% CI 5.69 to 10.71; 1 study, 35 participants; moderate-quality evidence) as assessed by the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (scored from 0 to 59), compared to the same dose of overground walking training. No study measured adverse events or quality of life. Mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support versus no walking training Eight studies (210 participants) assessed this comparison. Compared to no walking training, mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support increased walking speed (MD 0.07 m/s [change and postintervention scores], 95% CI 0.06 to 0.08; 7 studies, 161 participants; moderate-quality evidence) as assessed by the 10-meter or 8-meter walk test. There were no differences between groups in gross motor function (MD 1.09% [change and postintervention scores], 95% CI -0.57 to 2.75; 3 studies, 58 participants; low-quality evidence) as assessed by the GMFM; participation (SMD 0.33 [change scores], 95% CI -0.27 to 0.93; 2 studies, 44 participants; low-quality evidence); and quality of life (MD 9.50% [change scores], 95% CI -4.03 to 23.03; 1 study, 26 participants; low-quality evidence) as assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Cerebral Palsy Module (scored 0 [bad] to 100 [good]). Three studies (56 participants) reported no adverse events (low-quality evidence). Mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support versus the same dose of overground walking training Three studies (86 participants) assessed this comparison. There were no differences between groups in walking speed (MD -0.02 m/s [change and postintervention scores], 95% CI -0.08 to 0.04; 3 studies, 78 participants; low-quality evidence) as assessed by the 10-meter or 5-minute walk test; gross motor function (MD -0.73% [postintervention scores], 95% CI -14.38 to 12.92; 2 studies, 52 participants; low-quality evidence) as assessed by the GMFM; and participation (MD -4.74 [change scores], 95% CI -11.89 to 2.41; 1 study, 26 participants; moderate-quality evidence) as assessed by the School Function Assessment (scored from 19 to 76). No study measured adverse events or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared with no walking, mechanically assisted walking training probably results in small increases in walking speed (with or without body weight support) and may improve gross motor function (with body weight support). Compared with the same dose of overground walking, mechanically assisted walking training with body weight support may result in little to no difference in walking speed and gross motor function, although two studies found that mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support is probably more effective than the same dose of overground walking training for walking speed and gross motor function. Not many studies reported adverse events, although those that did appeared to show no differences between groups. The results are largely not clinically significant, sample sizes are small, and risk of bias and intensity of intervention vary across studies, making it hard to draw robust conclusions. Mechanically assisted walking training is a means to undertake high-intensity, repetitive, task-specific training and may be useful for children with poor concentration.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy/rehabilitation , Motor Activity , Orthotic Devices , Walking/education , Adolescent , Bias , Body Weight , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Neurological Rehabilitation/methods , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , Walking Speed
10.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 35(9): 810-821, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29659303

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To systematically review the evidence about whether activity training on the ground is effective on activity or participation in children with cerebral palsy. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in databases using relevant keywords. RCTs were included with children (≤18 years) with cerebral palsy who received activity training on the ground only or activity training on the ground combined with another type of physiotherapy. Outcome measures classified as measures of activity or participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health were analyzed. Results: Nine RCTs (257 participants) were included in this review. Individual studies resulted in conflicting results when activity training on the ground was compared to no intervention. Based on meta-analysis, activity training on the ground was not more effective than no intervention (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.18; confidence interval [CI]: -1.49 to 1.86) or other therapies (SMD: -0.09; CI: -0.86 to 0.69) (I2 > 75%) on improving activity or participation. Results from a single study demonstrated that activity training on the ground combined with other physiotherapy intervention was not more effective than no intervention (SMD: -0.18 CI: -0.89 to 0.54). Conclusions: The available evidence shows little effect of activity training on the ground on activity or participation in children with cerebral palsy, suggesting that rigorous trials with larger samples and larger "dosage" of activity training on the ground are needed in the future.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy/physiopathology , Cerebral Palsy/therapy , Exercise Therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Exercise Test , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Disabil Rehabil ; 38(7): 620-6, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26056856

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine if individualised resistance training increases the daily physical activity of adolescents and young adults with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: Young people with bilateral spastic CP were randomly assigned to intervention or to usual care. The intervention group completed an individualised lower limb progressive resistance training programme twice a week for 12 weeks in community gymnasiums. The primary outcome was daily physical activity (number of steps, and time sitting and lying). Secondary outcomes included muscle strength measured with a one-repetition maximum (1RM) leg press and reverse leg press. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks. RESULTS: From the 36 participants with complete data at 12 weeks, there were no between-group differences for any measure of daily physical activity. There was a likely increase in leg press strength in favour of the intervention group (mean difference 11.8 kg; 95% CI -1.4 to 25.0). No significant adverse events occurred during training. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term resistance training programme that may increase leg muscle strength was not effective in increasing daily physical activity. Other strategies are needed to address the low-daily physical activity levels of young people with bilateral spastic CP. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Progressive resistance training may increase muscle strength but does not lead to increases in daily physical activity of young people with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP) and mild to moderate walking disabilities. Other strategies apart from or in addition to resistance training are needed to address the low daily physical activity levels of young people with bilateral spastic CP and mild to moderate walking disabilities.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Leg/physiopathology , Motor Activity , Resistance Training/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Australia , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength , Muscle, Skeletal , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Walking , Young Adult
12.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 56(12): 1163-1171, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25052563

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of the study was to describe daily physical activity levels of adolescents and young adults with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP) and to identify factors that help predict these levels. METHOD: Daily physical activity was measured using an accelerometer-based activity monitor in 45 young people with bilateral spastic CP (23 males, 22 females; mean age 18y 6mo [SD 2y 5mo] range 16y 1mo-20y 11mo); classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level II or III and with contractures of <20° at hip and knee. Predictor variables included demographic characteristics (age, sex, weight) and physical characteristics (gross motor function, lower limb muscle strength, 6min walk distance). Data were analyzed using the information-theoretic approach, using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and linear regression. RESULTS: Daily activity levels were low compared with published norms. Gross Motor Function Measure Dimension-E (GMFM-E; walking, running, and jumping) was the only common predictor variable in models that best predicted energy expenditure, number of steps, and time spent sitting/lying. GMFM Dimension-D (standing) and bilateral reverse leg press strength contributed to the models that predicted daily physical activity. INTERPRETATION: Adolescents and young adults with bilateral spastic CP and mild to moderate walking disabilities have low levels of daily activity. The GMFM-E was an important predictor of daily physical activity.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Cerebral Palsy/physiopathology , Cerebral Palsy/psychology , Motor Activity/physiology , Adolescent , Energy Metabolism/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Regression Analysis , Walking/physiology , Young Adult
13.
Physiother Res Int ; 19(3): 186-92, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24634324

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We determined the criterion validity and the retest reliability of the ΑctivPAL™ monitor in young people with diplegic cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Activity monitor data were compared with the criterion of video recording for 10 participants. For the retest reliability, activity monitor data were collected from 24 participants on two occasions. Participants had to have diplegic CP and be between 14 and 22 years of age. They also had to be of Gross Motor Function Classification System level II or III. Outcomes were time spent in standing, number of steps (physical activity) and time spent in sitting (sedentary behaviour). RESULTS: For criterion validity, coefficients of determination were all high (r(2) ≥ 0.96), and limits of group agreement were relatively narrow, but limits of agreement for individuals were narrow only for number of steps (≥5.5%). Relative reliability was high for number of steps (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.87) and moderate for time spent in sitting and lying, and time spent in standing (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.60-0.66). For groups, changes of up to 7% could be due to measurement error with 95% confidence, but for individuals, changes as high as 68% could be due to measurement error. DISCUSSION: The results support the criterion validity and the retest reliability of the ActivPAL™ to measure physical activity and sedentary behaviour in groups of young people with diplegic CP but not in individuals.


Subject(s)
Accelerometry/instrumentation , Cerebral Palsy/physiopathology , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Motor Activity/physiology , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , Sedentary Behavior , Sensitivity and Specificity , Video Recording , Young Adult
14.
Clin Rehabil ; 25(4): 303-15, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21078699

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if habitual physical activity could be increased in people with cerebral palsy. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases until February 2010 using key words related to concepts of cerebral palsy and physical activity. This search was supplemented with citation tracking. METHODS: Studies had to include participants with cerebral palsy who have habitual physical activity measured over at least one day after a therapy intervention. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality with the PEDro scale (quantitative studies) and Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research (qualitative studies). For quantitative studies standardized mean differences were calculated and meta-analysis conducted. Qualitative data were synthesized thematically. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials (96 participants) and two qualitative studies (21 participants) were reviewed. Four studies evaluated exercise programmes, and one study an online educational and support programme. Meta-analysis showed that exercise programmes could increase habitual physical activity (δ = 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28 to 1.72). This result was reinforced by reports of increased daily activity in two qualitative studies. The online programme increased weekly minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (d = 0.81; 95% CI 0.17 to 1.45), and weekly step counts (d = 0.62; 95% CI 0.0 to 1.25). Positive effects were not maintained after programmes stopped. There was insufficient evidence to determine if demographic factors or programme characteristics, such as intensity and setting, were associated with outcomes. CONCLUSION: Preliminary evidence suggests that exercise programmes and online support programmes can increase habitual physical activity in people with cerebral palsy, but effects are not maintained when programmes stop.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Motor Activity/physiology , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Databases, Bibliographic , Humans , Internet
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...