Inversion recovery and saturation recovery pulmonary vein MR angiography using an image based navigator fluoro trigger and variable-density 3D cartesian sampling with spiral-like order.

Contrast enhanced pulmonary vein magnetic resonance angiography (PV CE-MRA) has value in atrial ablation pre-procedural planning. We aimed to provide high fidelity, ECG gated PV CE-MRA accelerated by variable density Cartesian sampling (VD-CASPR) with image navigator (iNAV) respiratory motion correction acquired in under 4 min. We describe its use in part during the global iodinated contrast shortage. VD-CASPR/iNAV framework was applied to ECG-gated inversion and saturation recovery gradient recalled echo PV CE-MRA in 65 patients (66 exams) using .15 mmol/kg Gadobutrol. Image quality was assessed by three physicians, and anatomical segmentation quality by two technologists. Left atrial SNR and left atrial/myocardial CNR were measured. 12 patients had CTA within 6 months of MRA. Two readers assessed PV ostial measurements versus CTA for intermodality/interobserver agreement. Inter-rater/intermodality reliability, reproducibility of ostial measurements, SNR/CNR, image, and anatomical segmentation quality was compared. The mean acquisition time was 3.58 ± 0.60 min. Of 35 PV pre-ablation datasets (34 patients), mean anatomical segmentation quality score was 3.66 ± 0.54 and 3.63 ± 0.55 as rated by technologists 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.7113). Good/excellent anatomical segmentation quality (grade 3/4) was seen in 97% of exams. Each rated one exam as moderate quality (grade 2). 95% received a majority image quality score of good/excellent by three physicians. Ostial PV measurements correlated moderate to excellently with CTA (ICCs range 0.52-0.86). No difference in SNR was observed between IR and SR. High quality PV CE-MRA is possible in under 4 min using iNAV bolus timing/motion correction and VD-CASPR.

Etiologies and Impact of Exclusion Rates for Transcatheter Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Structural Heart Clinical Trials at a High-Volume Quaternary Care Hospital.

There are various devices under clinical investigation for transcatheter mitral valve intervention and transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI); however, the exclusion rates remain high. We aimed to investigate the exclusion rates for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr), transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr), and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR). There were 129 patients who were referred to St. Francis Hospital & Heart Center valve clinic and completed screening between January 2021 and July 2022. The causes for exclusion were classified into 4 categories: patient withdrawal, anatomic unsuitability, clinical criteria, and medical futility. In 129 patients, the exclusion rates for TMVr, TMVR, TTVr, and TTVR were 81%, 85%, 91%, and 87%, respectively. Patient withdrawal and medical futility were leading etiologies for exclusion, followed by anatomic unsuitability. TMVr had the highest rate of patient withdrawal (64%) and the lowest anatomic unsuitability (5%) because of short posterior leaflet length. Replacement interventions have a higher anatomic unsuitability (33%) than repair interventions (17%) (p = 0.04). Most exclusions of anatomic unsuitability were because of mitral stenosis or small annulus size for TMVR and large annulus size for TTVR. A total of 50% of exclusions from TTVr were because of the presence of pacemaker/defibrillator leads. In patients excluded from their respective trials, patients being referred for TMVr had the highest recurrent hospitalization and repair group had a higher mortality (p <0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, the exclusion rates for transcatheter mitral valve intervention and TTVI trials remain high because of various reasons, limiting patient enrollment and treatment. This supports the need for further device improvement or exploring alternative means of therapy.

Association of pulmonary transit time by cardiac magnetic resonance with heart failure hospitalization in a large prospective cohort with diverse cardiac conditions.

BACKGROUND: Longer pulmonary transit time (PTT) is closely associated with hemodynamic abnormalities. However, the implications on heart failure (HF) risk have not been investigated broadly in patients with diverse cardiac conditions. In this study we examined the long-term risk of HF hospitalization associated with longer PTT in a large prospective cohort with a broad spectrum of cardiac conditions. METHODS: All subjects were prospectively recruited to undergo cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The dynamic images of first-pass perfusion were acquired to assess peak-to-peak pulmonary transit time (PTT) which was subsequently normalized to RR interval duration. The risk of HF was examined using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline confounding risk factors. RESULTS: Among 506 consecutively consented patients undergoing clinical cardiac MR with diverse cardiac conditions, the mean age was 63 ± 14 years and 373 (73%) were male. After a mean follow up duration of 4.5 ± 3.0 years, 70 (14%) patients developed hospitalized HF and of these 6 died. A normalized PTT ≥ 8.2 was associated with a significantly increased adjusted HF hazard ratio of 3.69 (95% CI 2.02, 6.73). The HF hazard ratio was 1.26 (95% CI 1.18, 1.33) for each 1 unit increase in PTT which was higher among those preserved (1.70, 95% CI 1.20, 2.41) compared to those with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< 50%) (1.18, 95% CI 1.09, 1.27). PTT remained a significant risk factor of hospitalized HF after additional adjustment for N-terminal pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) or left ventricular global longitudinal strain with additionally demonstrated incremental model improvement through likelihood ratio testing. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the role of PTT in assessing HF risk among patients with broad spectrum of cardiac conditions with reduced as well as preserved ejection fraction. Longer PTT duration is an incremental risk factor for HF when baseline global longitudinal strain and NT-proBNP are taken into consideration.

Healthcare workers' attitudes on mandates, incentives, and strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A mixed methods study.

Healthcare workers are a trusted health information source and are uniquely positioned to reduce the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this sequential exploratory mixed methods study was to understand attitudes of healthcare workers working in Massachusetts during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccine utilization, including vaccine mandates and incentives. Fifty-two individuals completed one-on-one interviews between April 22nd and September 7th, 2021. The survey was developed based on findings from the interviews; 209 individuals completed the online survey between February 17th and March 23rd, 2022. Both the interview and survey asked about attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccine and booster mandates, incentives, and strategies to improve vaccination rates. Most participants were female (79%-interview, 81%-survey), Caucasian (56%, 73%), and worked as physicians (37%, 34%) or nurses (10%, 18%). Overall, nuanced attitudes regarding vaccine and booster mandates were expressed; many supported mandates to protect their patients' health, others emphasized personal autonomy, while some were against mandates if job termination was the consequence of declining vaccines. Similarly, views regarding vaccine incentives differed; some considered incentives helpful, yet many viewed them as coercive. Strategies believed to be most effective to encourage vaccination included improving accessibility to vaccination sites, addressing misinformation, discussing vaccine safety, tailored community outreach via trusted messengers, and one-on-one conversations between patients and healthcare workers. Healthcare workers' experiences with strategies to improve utilization of COVID-19 vaccines and boosters have implications for public health policies. Generally, efforts to improve access and education were viewed more favorably than incentives and mandates.

Healthcare workers' perspectives on the COVID-19 vaccine and boosters for themselves, their patients, and their communities: a mixed methods study.

Aim: To examine experiences and attitudes of a diverse sample of clinical and non-clinical healthcare workers regarding COVID-19 vaccines and boosters for themselves, their patients, and their communities. Subject and methods: We conducted a sequential exploratory mixed methods study; 52 healthcare workers participated in qualitative interviews between April 22 and September 7, 2021, and 209 healthcare workers completed surveys between February 17 and March 23, 2022. Interviews and survey questions asked about personal attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and boosters and experiences discussing vaccination with patients. Results: Participants were predominantly White (56% and 73%, respectively) and female (79% and 81%, respectively). Factors motivating healthcare workers to take the vaccine were the belief that vaccination would protect themselves, their families, patients, and communities. Healthcare workers were accepting of and had high receipt of the booster, though some had diminished belief in its effectiveness after becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 after initial vaccination. Race related mistrust, misinformation related to vaccine safety, and concerns about vaccine effects during pregnancy were the most common barriers that providers encountered among their patients and communities. Conclusions: Healthcare workers' primary motivation to receive COVID-19 vaccines was the desire to protect themselves and others. Healthcare workers' perception was that concerns about safety and misinformation were more important barriers for their patients than themselves. Race-related medical mistrust amplified concerns about vaccine safety and hindered communication efforts.