Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 223: 109-117, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796036

ABSTRACT

Previous research indicates varying stroke rates after mitral valve (MV) interventions. This study aimed to compare postprocedural stroke risks after transcatheter and surgical MV interventions. Electronic databases were searched from inception to February 2024 for studies comparing stroke rates after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (mTEER), surgical MV repair/replacement, or guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Primary end points were all-time and early (<30 days) stroke. Secondary outcomes included new-onset atrial fibrillation and 1-year all-cause mortality. A frequentist network meta-analysis was employed to compare outcomes. The network meta-analysis included 18 studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 15 observational), with 51,703 patients. mTEER was associated with a decreased risk of all-time (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 0.89) and early stroke (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.51) compared with surgery, and a similar risk of all-time (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.76 to 3.12) and early stroke (OR 2.12, 95% CI 0.53 to 8.47) compared with GDMT. Conversely, surgery was associated with an increased risk of all-time (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.17 to 5.57) and early stroke (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.27 to 20.84) compared with GDMT. There were no statistically significant differences in the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.31) and 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.24) between mTEER versus surgery. In conclusion, mTEER was associated with a lower risk of stroke and similar risks of new-onset atrial fibrillation and 1-year mortality compared with surgical MV interventions. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of stroke and to determine strategies to reduce stroke risk after MV interventions.

3.
JACC Heart Fail ; 12(5): 810-825, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583167

ABSTRACT

This review serves to compare contemporary clinical practice recommendations for the management of heart failure (HF), as codified in the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline, the 2022 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) guideline, and the 2023 focused update of the 2021 ESC document. Overall, these guidelines aim to solidify significant advances throughout the HF continuum since the publication of previous full guideline iterations (2013 and 2016 for the ACC/AHA and ESC, respectively). All guidelines provide new recommendations for an increasingly complex landscape of HF care, with focus on primary HF prevention, HF stages, rapid initiation and optimization of evidence-based pharmacotherapies, overlapping cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities, device-based therapies, and management pathways for special groups of patients, including those with cardiac amyloidosis. Importantly, the ACC/AHA/HFSA document features special emphasis on HF risk prediction and screening, cost/value, social determinants of health, and health care disparities. The review discusses major similarities and differences between these recent guidelines and guideline updates, as well as their potential downstream implications for clinical care.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Europe , United States , Cardiology , American Heart Association , Disease Management , Societies, Medical
4.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 16(12): e013578, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37870587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is highly prevalent in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Polyvascular disease (PVD), defined as involvement of ≥2 vascular beds (VBs), that is, coronary, cerebrovascular, or peripheral, portends a poor prognosis in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; however, data on the association of PVD with outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR are limited. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry was analyzed to identify patients who underwent TAVR from November 2011 to March 2022. The exposure of interest was PVD. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included major vascular complications, major/life-threatening bleeding, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack/stroke, and valve- and non-valve-related readmissions. Outcomes were assessed at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: Of 443 790 patients who underwent TAVR, PVD was present in 150 823 (34.0%; 111 425 [25.1%] with 2VB-PVD and 39 398 [8.9%] with 3VB-PVD). On multivariable analysis, PVD was associated with increased all-cause mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.14-1.20]). There was an incremental increase in 1-year mortality with an increasing number of VBs involved (no PVD [reference]; 2VB-PVD: hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.09-1.15]: and 3VB-PVD: hazard ratio, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.26-1.36]). Patients with versus without PVD had higher rates of major vascular complications, major/life-threatening bleeding, transient ischemic attack/stroke, and non-valve-related readmissions at 30 days and 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: PVD is associated with worse outcomes after TAVR, and the risk is highest in patients with 3VB-PVD.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Ischemic Attack, Transient , Stroke , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/etiology , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/surgery , Registries , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Risk Factors
5.
Am J Cardiol ; 206: 277-284, 2023 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37725853

ABSTRACT

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is the leading cause of cardiovascular mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), contributing to around 25% of deaths observed in pivotal HFpEF trials. However, predictors and outcomes of in-hospital SCA in HFpEF have not been well characterized. We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2016 to 2017) to identify adult hospitalizations with a diagnosis of HFpEF. Patients with acute or chronic conditions associated with SCA (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, acute pulmonary embolism, sarcoidosis) were excluded. We ascertained whether SCA occurred during these hospitalizations, identified predictors of SCA using multivariate logistic regression, and determined outcomes of SCA in HFpEF. Of 2,909,134 hospitalizations, SCA occurred in 1.48% (43,105). The mean age of the SCA group was 72.3 ± 12.4 years, 55.8% were women, and 66.4% were White. Presence of third-degree atrioventricular block (odds ratio [OR] 5.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.31 to 6.67), left bundle branch block (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.72 to 2.25), and liver disease (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.02) were the leading predictors of SCA in HFpEF. After excluding patients with do-not-resuscitate status, the SCA group versus those without SCA had higher mortality (25.9% vs 1.6%), major bleeding complications (4.1% vs 1.7%), increased use of percutaneous coronary intervention (2.5% vs 0.7%), and mechanical circulatory assist device (1.2% vs 0.1%). These observational inpatient data suggest identifiable risk factors for SCA in HFpEF including cardiac arrhythmias. Further research is warranted to identify the best tools to risk-stratify patients with HFpEF to implement targeted SCA prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Heart Arrest , Heart Failure , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Inpatients , Stroke Volume , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/epidemiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Risk Factors , Prognosis
7.
Am J Cardiol ; 203: 149-156, 2023 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37499594

ABSTRACT

Data on the association between hospital procedural volume and 30-day readmissions after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (mTEER) are limited. We used the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify hospitals that performed at least 5 mTEERs. Hospitals were categorized based on tertiles of annual mTEER volume as low-volume (5 to 13), medium-volume (14 to 28), and high-volume (29 to 171). Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to examine the association between hospital mTEER volume and 30-day readmissions. Median (interquartile range) annual hospital mTEER volume was 20 (11.5 to 34). Of 234 hospitals included in the study, 77 (32.9%), 77 (32.9%), and 80 (34.2%) were categorized as low-volume, medium-volume, and high-volume. Of 5,574 index mTEER procedures included in this study, 634 (11.4%), 1,353 (24.3%), and 3,587 (64.3%) were performed at low-volume, medium-volume, and high-volume centers, respectively. In the overall study cohort, rates of 30-day all-cause readmissions after mTEER were 13.2%. In multivariable analyses, there was no significant association between hospital mTEER volume (as a categorical variable) and 30-day all-cause or cause-specific (cardiac, non-cardiac, heart failure) readmissions. Similarly, no significant relation was observed between hospital mTEER volume as a continuous variable and 30-day all-cause or cause-specific readmissions in restricted cubic spline analysis. In conclusion, in a nationally representative sample of 234 hospitals with >5,500 mTEER procedures, we found no association between annual hospital mTEER volume and 30-day all-cause or cause-specific readmissions.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Humans , Mitral Valve/surgery , Patient Readmission , Hospitals, High-Volume , Hospitals, Low-Volume , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Treatment Outcome , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery
8.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(10): 101881, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37336310

ABSTRACT

Psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) are known to be associated with worse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. However, there are limited data on the impact of PSRFs on readmissions after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) before and during the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) pandemic. Therefore, we aimed to examine this association and whether the effects of PSRFs were amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic. We queried the 2019 and 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database for adult (age ≥18 years) index admissions with AMI as the primary diagnosis. They were then divided into 2 cohorts based on the presence or absence of ≥1 PSRF and compared across non-COVID-19 (2019) and COVID-19 (2020) time periods. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause readmissions. Secondary outcomes included cause-specific readmissions (cardiac, noncardiac, AMI, heart failure). Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression was conducted to evaluate differences in outcomes. The study included 380,820 patients with index AMI, of which 214,384 (56%) had ≥1 PSRFs. Patients with PSRFs were younger, more likely to be female, and had a higher prevalence of CV risk factors. Of 30-day all-cause readmissions were higher in patients with PSRFs in both eras. Moreover, noncardiac and heart failure readmissions were also higher in patients with PSRFs admitted with AMI in 2019 and 2020. This study of a nationally representative population magnifies the association of PSRF with more unplanned readmissions after AMI in both pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 times.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Myocardial Infarction , Adult , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Male , Patient Readmission , Pandemics , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Heart Failure/epidemiology
9.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(10): 101795, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37207818

ABSTRACT

Psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) have emerged as crucial nontraditional risk factors affecting outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). There is a paucity of data studying these risk factors in HF nationally. Additionally, whether the COVID-19 pandemic impacted outcomes remains unexplored, given the increased psychosocial risk during these times. Our objective is to assess the impact of PSRFs on the outcomes of HF and their comparison across non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 eras. Patients with a diagnosis of HF were selected using the 2019-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Two cohorts were created based on the presence or absence of PSRFs and compared across non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 eras. We examined the association using hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models. A total of 305,955 patients were included, of which 175,348 (57%) had PSRFs. Patients with PSRFs were younger, less likely to be female, and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. All-cause readmissions were higher in patients with PSRFs in both the eras. All-cause mortality [odds ratio, OR 1.15 (1.04-1.27), P = 0.005] and composite of MACE [OR 1.11 (1.06-1.16), P < 0.001] were higher in patients in the non-COVID-19 era. Compared to 2019, patients with PSRFs and HF in 2020 had significantly higher all-cause mortality [OR 1.13 (1.03-1.24), P = 0.009]; however, the composite of MACE was comparable [OR 1.04 (1.00-1.09), P = 0.03]. In conclusion, the presence of PSRFs in patients with HF is associated with a significant increase in all-cause readmissions in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 eras. The worse outcomes evident in the COVID-19 era highlights the importance of multidisciplinary care in this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Humans , Female , Male , Pandemics , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Risk Factors
10.
World J Hepatol ; 15(1): 79-88, 2023 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36744164

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading cause of liver disease globally with an estimated prevalence of 25%, with the clinical and economic burden expected to continue to increase. In the United States, non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) has an estimated incidence of 61-78 cases per 100000 people with a mortality rate of 2%-15% based on co-morbidity burden. AIM: To identify the outcomes of NVUGIB in NAFLD hospitalizations in the United States. METHODS: We utilized the National Inpatient Sample from 2016-2019 to identify all NVUGIB hospitalizations in the United States. This population was divided based on the presence and absence of NAFLD. Hospitalization characteristics, outcomes and complications were compared. RESULTS: The total number of hospitalizations for NVUGIB was 799785, of which 6% were found to have NAFLD. NAFLD and GIB was, on average, more common in younger patients, females, and Hispanics than GIB without NAFLD. Interestingly, GIB was less common amongst blacks with NAFLD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted, controlling for the multiple covariates. The primary outcome of interest, mortality, was found to be significantly higher in patients with NAFLD and GIB [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.018 (1.013-1.022)]. Secondary outcomes of interest, shock [aOR = 1.015 (1.008-1.022)], acute respiratory failure [aOR = 1.01 (1.005-1.015)] and acute liver failure [aOR = 1.016 (1.013-1.019)] were all more likely to occur in this cohort. Patients with NAFLD were also more likely to incur higher total hospital charges (THC) [$2148 ($1677-$2618)]; however, were less likely to have a longer length of stay [0.27 d (0.17-0.38)]. Interestingly, in our study, the patients with NAFLD were less likely to suffer from acute myocardial infarction [aOR = 0.992 (0.989-0.995)]. Patients with NAFLD were not more likely to suffer acute kidney injury, sepsis, blood transfusion, intubation, or dialysis. CONCLUSION: NVUGIB in NAFLD hospitalizations had higher inpatient mortality, THC, and complications such as shock, acute respiratory failure, and acute liver failure compared to those without NAFLD.

11.
Cureus ; 12(11): e11388, 2020 Nov 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33312789

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors and etiological subtyping of ischemic stroke in young adults in the Indian population. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 160 patients, in the age group of 18 to 45 years with ischemic stroke, registered at a tertiary care hospital in Delhi, India between March 2014 and January 2018. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, previous history of stroke, valvular heart disease, coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation, family history, and migraine were considered as the identifiable risk factors. Stroke subtyping was done according to the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 36.2 years with 74% being males. Headache, vomiting, difficulty in speech, and hemiparesis were the common complaints at presentation. Common risk factors identified were hypertension (50%), prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA; 32%), dyslipidemia (25%), family history of stroke (18%), and smoking (15%). The most common TOAST subtype was undetermined (64%), followed by other determined cause (ODC; 20%), and cardioembolism (15%). CONCLUSION: There is a certain dissimilarity in the risk factors for ischemic stroke in young adults living in developing countries compared to those belonging to developed nations. Primary and secondary prevention targeted at the modifiable risk factors of ischemic stroke is necessary. Cerebral artery dissection, being a prevalent cause of ischemic stroke in young adults, should be carefully evaluated. A more appropriate stroke classification system specifically tailored for younger patients is needed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...