Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Br J Pain ; 18(1): 95-103, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38344265

ABSTRACT

Background: Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) and persistent post-operative opioid use (PPOU) are inconsistently defined in published literature. This review comprehensively summarised their definitions, prevalence and determinants from existing systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Methods: Systematic reviews or meta-analyses evaluating the prevalence of CPSP and PPOU in adults after surgeries were retrieved from an electronic database search applying structured search strategies in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to 31 December 2022. Two reviewers selected systematic reviews, extracted data regarding the definition, prevalence and risk factors of CPSP and PPOU and assessed the quality using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Results: The study identified 6936 records related to chronic pain and persistent opioid use in patients after surgery, of which 24 articles were identified for full-text review. Eighteen systematic reviews were included in this umbrella review, of which five systematic reviews assessed chronic pain in patients who had undergone a surgical procedure, and 13 reviews assessed persistent opioid use after surgery. Despite considerable variations in patient characteristics (from age ≥18 years), types of surgeries, follow-up duration and the definitions of measures, most reviews were of medium to good quality (fulfilled 9-11/16 AMSTAR 2 criteria). The prevalence of CPSP and PPOU, commonly synthesised at 3, 6 or 12 months after surgeries, varied from 5%-58% and 2%-65%, respectively, despite various terminologies, definitions and timing of measures and associated determinants. The prevalence of neuropathic pain in CPSP was obtainable for four surgeries, with 9%-74%. Conclusion: To inform future practice and policy to optimise pain management and opioid safety, consensus on standardising measurements and further studies assessing risk factors associated with CPSP, PPOU and adverse outcomes are needed.

2.
BMC Med ; 22(1): 5, 2024 01 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167142

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Long-term opioid use is associated with dependency, addiction, and serious adverse events. Although a framework to reduce inappropriate opioid prescribing exists, there is no consensus on prescribing indicators for preventable opioid-related problems in patients with chronic pain in primary care in the UK. This study aimed to identify opioid prescription scenarios for developing indicators for prescribing opioids to patients with chronic pain in primary care. METHODS: Scenarios of opioid prescribing indicators were identified from a literature review, guidelines, and government reports. Twenty-one indicators were identified and presented in various opioid scenarios concerning opioid-related harm and adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, and drug-disease interactions in certain disease conditions. After receiving ethics approval, two rounds of electronic Delphi panel technique surveys were conducted with 24 expert panellists from the UK (clinicians, pharmacists, and independent prescribers) from August 2020 to February 2021. Each indicator was rated on a 1-9 scale from inappropriate to appropriate. The score's median, 30th and 70th percentiles, and disagreement index were calculated. RESULTS: The panel unanimously agreed that 15 out of the 21 opioid prescribing scenarios were inappropriate, primarily due to their potential for causing harm to patients. This consensus was reflected in the low appropriateness scores (median ranging from 1 to 3). There were no scenarios with a high consensus that prescribing was appropriate. The indicators were considered inappropriate due to drug-disease interactions (n = 8), drug-drug interactions (n = 2), adverse effects (n = 3), and prescribed dose and duration (n = 2). Examples included prescribing opioids during pregnancy, concurrently with benzodiazepines, long-term without a laxative prescription and prescribing > 120-mg morphine milligram equivalent per day or long-term duration over 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The high agreement on opioid prescribing indicators indicates that these potentially hazardous consequences are relevant and concerning to healthcare practitioners. Future research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and implementation of these indicators within primary care settings. This research will provide valuable insights and evidence to support opioid prescribing and deprescribing strategies. Moreover, the findings will be crucial in informing primary care practitioners and shaping quality outcome frameworks and other initiatives to enhance the safety and quality of care in primary care settings.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Delphi Technique , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Drug Prescriptions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Primary Health Care
3.
Cureus ; 15(6): e40461, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37456461

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: When a nonsurgical endodontic treatment is ineffective, surgery is necessary. This entails putting a retrofilling to seal the tooth's apex. Exposing the lesion, performing a curettage, exposing the root apex, resecting it, preparing the root end, and lastly filling the cavity with the proper material are all steps in endodontic surgery. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare the apical microleakage of four root-end filling materials in cavities prepared using ultrasonic retro tip in in vitro conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An in vitro study was conducted on 60 extracted single-rooted teeth and was cut at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). They were biomechanically prepared and obturated. Apical 3 mm root-end resection was done using a diamond disc. Root-end cavities were made using an ultrasonic retro tip. Teeth were separated into four groups and filled with SuperEBA®ï¸ ethoxy-benzoic acid (EBA; Keystone Industries, New Jersey), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine (Septodont, France), and TotalFill Bioceramic Root Repair Material (BC RRM; FKG Dentaire Sàrl, Switzerland). The samples were kept in methylene blue dye and split longitudinally. The degree of dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope and scored. Finally, the results were analyzed. RESULTS: TotalFill BC RRM and Biodentine showed the least apical microleakage (p <0.05). Group 1 samples had the highest mean microleakage, followed by Group 2, Group 3, and Group 4 samples. CONCLUSION: All of the sample groups showed some evidence of microleakage, but not all of the samples showed leaking. SuperEBA (Group 1) demonstrated the highest microleakage when compared to the other groups.

4.
Br J Pain ; 17(1): 4-5, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36815065
5.
Chem Commun (Camb) ; 57(100): 13748-13751, 2021 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34852029

ABSTRACT

Nanoporous metal oxides are appealing candidates for energy storage applications as they can interact with guest species from inner and outer surfaces, leading to improved energy and power density performance. We have synthesized VO2 (B) microflowers with a stable phase and tailored porous structures utilizing block copolymers to achieve excellent supercapacitor performance.

6.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 9(6): 2958-2962, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32984155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice is the cornerstone of dentistry and especially endodontics. Diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment with recent advancement based on evidence would be a great help for the patent satisfaction and treatment prognosis; hence, the aim of present study was to explore difference between perception, knowledge, and practice of endodontists and general dental practitioners (GDPs) towards evidence-based practice and factors associated with it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study is a cross-sectional descriptive questionnaire study conducted among specialists in the subject of conservative and endodontic dentistry and GDPs working in private clinics in Modinagar city, Uttar Pradesh. The study was conducted in October 2019. In the present study, a close-ended questionnaire was prepared to determine the perception and practice of dental specialists. RESULTS: The majority of endodontists (31 [35.22%]) belonged to the age group of 36-45 years of age while most of the GDPs (32 [36.36%]) belonged to 25-35 years of age group. The majority of endodontists were females (56[63.64%]) and most of the GDPs were males (50 (56.81]). More endodontists (47 [53.42]) had a positive perception of evidence-based practice than GDPs (15[16.42]). Practice toward evidence was fair among most of the endodontists (49 [55.68%]) and GDPs (54 [61.36%]). CONCLUSION: There was a more positive perception regarding evidence-based practice among endodontists than GDPs, knowledge was high among endodontists regarding evidence-based practice and practice was also good among endodontists. Factors associated with perception, knowledge, and practice among endodontists and GDPs were age in years, gender, year of practice, number of endodontic patients treating per month.

7.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 44(6): 904-911, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31497885

ABSTRACT

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Pharmacists play vital roles in medicines optimization in different care settings. Studies have shown that optimizing patient's pre-existing co-morbidities prior to the surgery leads to better post-operative outcomes. The Enhanced Surgical medicines optimization service (ESMOS) is an innovative surgical pharmacy service introduced at a large teaching hospital in the UK in September 2017 which aimed to reduce the length of stay and post-operative complications in general surgical patients. This purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of this service at 12 months after it was rolled out. METHODS: This cohort study was undertaken between September 2017 and September 2018. Adult patients undergoing elective major general surgical procedures were included and stratified into four sub-specialties, including hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB), upper gastrointestinal (GI), lower GI and vascular surgery. Patients undergoing emergency and day case procedures or with missing outcome data were excluded from this study. Patients' demographics, baseline co-morbidities, high-risk medications, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, surgical procedure, post-operative complications, length of stay and nature of pharmacist interventions were collected and reported by descriptive statistics. Length of stay was compared with the corresponding expected length of stay by the national standard. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 246 patients were included in the four general sub-specialties: HPB (n = 82), upper GI (n = 17), lower GI (n = 87) and vascular (n = 60). There was a significant reduction in the median length of stay in three surgical specialties, compared with the national standard: lower GI (median reduction: -2; IQR: -4, 1.8; P = .038), HPB (median reduction: -4.5; IQR: -7, -1; P = .001) and vascular (median reduction: -2; IQR: -4, 0; P = .043). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The ESMOS model is a novel care pathway that allows both early identification of medicines optimization and peri-operative drug management issues in surgical patients, and potentially reduces the overall length of stay.


Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Pharmaceutical Services/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacies/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data
8.
Angle Orthod ; 89(2): 275-283, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30779676

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between traditional cephalometric measurements and corresponding nonradiographic three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 20 orthodontic patients (10 male and 10 female) who received lateral cephalometric radiographs and 3D dentofacial photogrammetric records with each subject serving as his or her own control for a total sample size of 40 images (20 per method). A 3D analysis that resembled a traditional cephalometric analysis was established using the eyes and natural head orientation as substitutes for the cranial base. Pearson correlation coefficients and multivariable linear regression plots were calculated to evaluate the relationship between the photogrammetry measurements and the cephalometric measurements. RESULTS: The ANB angle, mandibular plane angle, lower anterior face height, upper incisor angle to SN, upper incisor angle to NA, and all measurements of lower incisor position and inclination had strong positive Pearson correlation coefficients with the corresponding 3D photogrammetry measurements ( P < .004). Statistically significant regression plots demonstrated that cephalometric relationships between the jaws and incisor orientation can be predicted from corresponding 3D photogrammetry measurements. CONCLUSIONS: 3D photogrammetry measurements relating the jaws to each other and incisor orientation has a strong positive correlation with corresponding traditional cephalometric measurements and can serve as cephalometric predictors. Capturing the eyes using 3D photogrammetry can obviate the need to expose the cranial base and allow limiting the radiographic field to the area of interest.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry , Incisor , Photogrammetry , Cephalometry/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Radiography, Dental
9.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 172: 281-289, 2019 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30716662

ABSTRACT

Stability of chromium in the ferrochrome slag dumps and leachate are affected by pH, redox potential and the presence of other metallic species in the slag. It is desirable to keep chromium in slag dumps in the trivalent [Cr(III)] state because trivalent chromium is 1000 times less toxic to living organisms than the hexavalent form [Cr(VI)]. Due to the low toxicity and low mobility of Cr(III), it is recommended to convert Cr(VI) to Cr(III) wherever possible to protect the health of living organisms. In this study, the role of Cr(VI) reducing organisms for stabilising chromium in slag dumps was evaluated in the presence of iron [oxidation states Fe(II) and Fe(III)]. The study showed that stabilisation of chromium species in the trivalent state was most favourable under aerated conditions. Up to 100 mg/L Cr(VI) was reduced in less than 24 h by cultures grown under aerobic conditions in the presence of Fe(III). A much shorter time (6 h) was required to reduce the same amount of Cr(VI) in the presence of Fe(II). When oxygen was completely excluded, it was only possible to reduce 20 mg/L in about 48 h which was much slower than the removal of 100 mg/L in less than 24 h under aerated conditions. Fe(II) contributed directly to catalytic reduction of Cr(VI) reduction whereas Fe(III) was beneficial to Cr(VI) reduction up to an initial Cr(VI) concentration of 75 mg/L. Evaluation of Cr(VI) reduction kinetics showed that Cr(VI) reduction under aerobic conditions followed the non-competitively inhibited mixed-order reaction. Cr(VI) reduction in sealed reactor vessels, under anaerobic conditions, followed a modified non-competitive inhibition reaction model. The results indicate that chromium stabilisation in ferrochrome slag dumps would require maintenance of a fully aerated dump supplemented by a culture of Cr(VI) reducing organisms.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/metabolism , Chromium/metabolism , Iron/chemistry , Sewage/microbiology , Biodegradation, Environmental , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Industrial Waste , Kinetics , Oxidation-Reduction
10.
Eur J Orthod ; 39(2): 215-225, 2017 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28339510

ABSTRACT

Background: Orthodontic diagnostic standards generally use the cranial base as a reference and rely on samples selected by orthodontists. Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide male and female standards for a novel non-radiographic approach for orthodontic diagnosis that utilizes 3D dentofacial photogrammetry using the eyes and natural head orientation as references instead of the cranial base. Methods: One hundred and eighty females and 200 males between the ages of 18 and 35 years from 2 modeling agencies were orthodontically screened for near ideal occlusion. Subjects that met the inclusion criteria were rated by a sample of 40 lay people for attractiveness on a visual analogue scale. The final sample that had 3D facial and dental imaging included 49 subjects 25 males and 24 females with near ideal occlusion and considered attractive by the public. Results: Inter and Intra-examiner ICC were greater than 0.8 for both landmarking and indexing. Relative to a coronal plane contacting the pupils (MC), the mean sagittal position of the alar curvature (representing the nasomaxillary complex) was 14.36 ± 3.08 mm in males and 12.4 ± 3.58 mm in females. The sagittal position of soft tissue pogonion relative to the pupils was 14.84 ± 3.63 mm in males and 12.78 ± 5.68 mm in females. The angle between the alar curvature and pogonion relative to the pupils was 9° in males and 10° in females. With the exception of the occlusal plane which was steeper in females, no ratios or angular facial measurements showed a significant gender difference. Relative to MC, males had more proclined upper incisors (20° vs 16°) and more retroclined Lower incisors (27° vs 31°; P > 0.05). A Procrustes ANOVA and permutation test showed that the shapes of males and females are different enough to be considered two distinct populations. Conclusions: 1. When using the proposed method for orthodontic diagnosis, male and female patients should be compared to their respective dentofacial standards. 2. Validation of the proposed method and standards on an orthodontic population is underway to determine the scope its use.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion/diagnosis , Photogrammetry/methods , Photography, Dental/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Cephalometry/methods , Face/anatomy & histology , Female , Humans , Incisor/anatomy & histology , Male , Malocclusion/therapy , Observer Variation , Orthodontics, Corrective , Reference Values , Sex Characteristics , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...