Incidence and complications of hypothyroidism postlaryngectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hypothyroidism is common postlaryngectomy and is associated with laryngectomy-specific complications. The objective of this study is to determine the incidence and predictors of hypothyroidism postlaryngectomy and its associated complications. METHODS: Systematic review, data extraction, and meta-analyses were performed following the PRISMA protocol. Six databases were searched for studies reporting on postlaryngectomy thyroid status with incidence, risk factors, management, or complications. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies with 6333 patients were included. The pooled incidence of postlaryngectomy hypothyroidism is 49% (CI 42%-57%). Subgroup analysis showed postlaryngectomy hypothyroidism rates significantly correlated with hemithyroidectomy and radiotherapy. Patients who underwent laryngectomy, hemithyroidectomy, and radiotherapy had a 65% (CI 59%-71%) rate of hypothyroidism; laryngectomy and hemithyroidectomy 46% (CI 33%-60%); laryngectomy and radiotherapy 26% (CI 19%-35%); and laryngectomy alone 11% (CI 4%-27%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Laryngectomized patients with partial thyroidectomy or radiation therapy are at significant risk of postoperative hypothyroidism. Evidence-based protocols for early detection and (prophylactic) treatment should be established.

Improving Time-to-Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients through Faster Single Gene EGFR Testing Using the Idylla™ EGFR Testing Platform.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may benefit from a short time-to-treatment (TTT). Predictive biomarker testing is performed prior to treatment, as recommended by various international expert consensus bodies. Genetic testing is more time-intensive than immunohistochemistry (IHC) and commonly contributes to prolonged TTT. For epidermal growth factor receptor-positive patients (EGFR+), further genetic testing may not be required due to the mutual exclusivity of actionable mutations. METHODS: The trial cohort (N = 238) received both BC Cancer NGS panel (Oncopanel) and Idylla EGFR testing. Data were also collected for a control cohort (N = 220) that received Oncopanel testing. For each patient, the time that the lab received the sample, the time taken to report the NGS and Idylla tests, the time of first treatment, and the final treatment regimen were recorded. RESULTS: A concordance frequency of 98.7% (232/235) was observed between the Idylla and NGS panel. The lab turnaround time (TAT) was faster for the Idylla test by an average of 12.4 days (N = 235, p < 0.01). Overall, the average TTT in the trial cohort (N = 114) was 10.1 days faster (p < 0.05) than the control (N = 114), leading to a 25% reduction in TTT. For patients treated based on EGFR positivity, the mean TTT was 16.8 days faster (p < 0.05) in the trial cohort (N = 33) than the control cohort (N = 28), leading to a 48% reduction in TTT. CONCLUSION: Using the Idylla EGFR test as part of the molecular testing repertoire in advanced-stage NSCLC patients could significantly reduce TTT.

A Case of ALK-Rearranged Combined Lung Adenocarcinoma and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with Diffuse Bone Metastasis and Partial Response to Alectinib.

We report a rare case of stage IV pulmonary combined large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and adenocarcinoma (ACA), both demonstrating anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement by IHC and FISH. This 61-year-old lifelong nonsmoking Asian woman presented with a cough, and after diagnosis and surgical treatment, completed four cycles of adjuvant cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. She subsequently developed recurrence with bony metastases of exclusively ALK-positive LCNEC. Alectinib was started, and the patient experienced a partial response.

Histological subtype is associated with PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T-cell infiltrates in triple-negative breast carcinoma.

Assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and CD8+ lymphocyte infiltrates in triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) can provide valuable prognostic and predictive information. Knowledge of clinical and pathological factors that predict the status of these two markers is needed to better select patients likely to respond to immunotherapy. We aim to assess the association between histological subtypes of TNBC and tumor microenvironment type, defined here as each tumor's PD-L1 status and the percentage of CD8+ cells in its tumor-associated lymphocyte population. Tissue microarrays consisting of 72 TNBC cases (28 conventional invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs), 21 basal-like IDCs, 18 apocrine carcinomas, and five metaplastic carcinomas) were evaluated for PD-L1 expression using the SP142 and 22C3 immunohistochemical (IHC) assays. The percentages of CD8+ and CD4+ intra-tumoral stromal lymphocytes in each case were analyzed using QuPath (open-source software platform) on CD8 and CD4 IHC-stained digital slides of the TMAs. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were also assessed on representative H&E-stained whole-tissue sections and compared to CD8+ and CD4+ lymphocyte percentages, and to the CD4/CD8 ratio of intra-tumoral lymphocytes for each case. Cases were then separated into four tumor microenvironment groups (PD-L1+/CD8+, PD-L1+/CD8-, PD-L1-/CD8+, and PD-L1-/CD8-). Basal-like IDCs were most often PD-L1-/CD8- (71.4%/61.9% of cases with SP142/22C3, respectively), while conventional IDCs were more distributed among PD-L1+ and PD-L1- microenvironments (35.7% PD-L1+/CD8+ and 42.9% PD-L1-/CD8- with the 22C3 assay). Apocrine carcinomas tended to be PD-L1-/CD8- (83.3% of cases with both SP142 and 22C3 antibodies). Metaplastic carcinomas were PD-L1-/CD8- in 60% of cases with both 22C3 and SP142. A CD8+ lymphocyte percentage ≥5% strongly predicted PD-L1 positivity (positive predictive value using the 22C3 assay: 0.75). Our data suggest that some histological subtypes of TNBC are predictive of PD-L1 status and CD8+ T-cell infiltrate levels.

Automated PD-L1 Scoring for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Using Open-Source Software.

PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is predictive of response to immunotherapy, but scoring of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry shows considerable interobserver variability. Automated methods may allow more consistent and expedient PD-L1 scoring. We aimed to assess the technical concordance of PD-L1 scores produced using free open source QuPath software with the manual scores of three pathologists. A classifier for PD-L1 scoring was trained using 30 NSCLC image patches. A separate test set of 207 image patches from 69 NSCLC resection cases was used for comparison of automated and manual scores. Automated and average manual scores showed excellent correlation (concordance correlation coeffecient = 0.925), though automated scoring resulted in significantly more 1-49% scores than manual scoring (p = 0.012). At both 1% and 50% thresholds, automated scores showed a level of concordance with our 'gold standard' (the average of three pathologists' manual scores) similar to that of individual pathologists. Automated scoring showed high sensitivity (95%) but lower specificity (84%) at a 1% threshold, and excellent specificity (100%) but lower sensitivity (71%) at a 50% threshold. We conclude that our automated PD-L1 scoring system for NSCLC has an accuracy similar to that of individual pathologists. The detailed protocol we provide for free open source scoring software and our discussion of the limitations of this technology may facilitate more effective integration of automated scoring into clinical workflows.

Discordance in PD-L1 scores on repeat testing of non-small cell lung carcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: PD-L1 expression may be used as a biomarker predictive of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) response to PD-L1 inhibitor treatment. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression and variation in PD-L1 test interpretation may contribute to differences in PD-L1 test results between samples of the same patient's disease. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified 77 NSCLC patients with 22C3 PharmDx PD-L1 assays performed on two different tumor samples. Patients clinically suspected to have two separate primaries were excluded. PD-L1 test results in different score categories (<1%, 1-49% and ≥50%) were considered discordant. Clinical and pathologic factors associated with discordance were assessed. RESULTS: 28 (36%) of the 77 cases had discordant PD-L1 scores between samples. Patients with an initial test result of 1-49% were most likely to have a discordant second test result. Specimen type (cytology, small biopsy or resection), specimen site (lung, lymph node, pleura/pleural effusion or distant metastasis), time between specimen collection, and treatment between specimen collection were not significantly associated with the rate of discordance. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat PD-L1 testing of the same patient's NSCLC results frequently resulted in discordant test results, independent of whether the samples differed in clinical or pathologic factors. This discordance rate underscores the extent to which PD-L1 levels are heterogeneous and difficult to accurately represent with a single test value. Further study of the predictive value of PD-L1 scores in cases with discordant results is needed.

Comparability of laboratory-developed and commercial PD-L1 assays in non-small cell lung carcinoma.

PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is predictive of response to treatment with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Different inhibitors have been developed with different PD-L1 assays, which use different PD-1 antibody clones on different immunohistochemistry platforms. Depending on instrument and reagent availability, laboratory-developed tests with cross-platform use of PD-L1 antibodies may have practical benefits over commercial assays. The 22C3 pharmDx Assay (referred to as 22C3 DAKO), the VENTANA PD-L1 SP263 Assay (referred to as SP263 VENTANA) and a lab-developed test using the 22C3 antibody on the VENTANA BenchMark ULTRA IHC/ISH system (referred to as 22C3 VENTANA) were performed on whole sections of 85 NSCLC surgical resections. All sections were independently scored by three pathologists using tumor proportion scores. Correlation coefficients for continuous scores in pairwise comparisons between assays ranged from 0.976 to 0.978. When using a 1% positivity threshold (dichotomous scores), the 22C3 DAKO assay and 22C3 VENTANA assays showed the greatest agreement (93% agreement, κ = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.97), and the 22C3 DAKO and SP263 VENTANA assays tended to show slightly less agreement (84% agreement, κ = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.82). When using a 50% positivity threshold (dichotomous scores), all pairwise comparisons showed similar agreement (96-99% agreement, κ = 0.89-0.97). Overall, there was no significant difference between assays at 1% or 50% thresholds (P = .77). These data are consistent with potential interchangeability of these assays, which may widen the scope of PD-L1 assays available to laboratories and reduce logistical barriers to testing.