Morphologic predictors of in hospital mortality in acute type III aortic dissection. / Morfologicheskie prediktory gospital'noi smertnosti u bol'nykh s ostrym rassloeniem aorty III tipa.

INTRODUCTION: In-hospital mortality of acute aortic type III dissection ranged about 12%. Complicated dissections represent about 18% of all cases, and require open surgery or TEVAR. More morphological predictors of in hospital mortality are needed to differentiate patients who should be selected for immediate, surgical or endovascular intervention. METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2014, 74 patients with acute aortic type III dissection were enrolled at Clinic of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery in Belgrade Serbia and retrospectively analyzed. Every MSCT was observed in regard to morphologic characteristics of dissection. RESULTS: By analyzing morphologic parameters in patients between survival and non-survival group only localization of intimal tear showed statistical significance (p=0,020). The size of the intimal tear didn't reach statistical significance with the tendency of doing so in a larger sample of patients (p=0,063) with the cut-off value of 9.55mm. The shape of the true lumen was on the border of statistical significance (p=0,053). CONCLUSION: Inner curvature intimal tear localization, huge intimal tear as well as elliptic shape of the true lumen together should raise awareness to a subgroup at risk for in hospital mortality. More liberal endovascular treatment in this subgroup of patients is advocated.

Morphological Differences in the Aorto-iliac Segment in AAA Patients of Caucasian and Asian Origin.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to quantify aorto-iliac morphology differences between AAA patients of Caucasian and Asian origin. Additionally, the impact of patient demographic characteristics was assessed, which could influence the morphological differences. METHODS: This international multicentre study included two tertiary referral institutions from Europe and one from China. CT scans with 3D reconstruction of 296 patients with infrarenal AAA >5 cm were analysed. Eighteen measurements were recorded from each CT scan and compared between Caucasian and Asian patients. RESULTS: Caucasian patients had longer common iliac arteries (right: 65.0 vs. 33.1 mm, p < .001 left: 65.0 vs. 35.2 mm, p < .001), longer aneurysm neck (33.0 vs. 28.4 mm, p < .001), greater aneurysm to aortic axis angle (153.0° vs. 142.2°, p < .001), and longer combined aorto-iliac length (195.7 vs. 189.2 mm, p < .001). However, Asian patients had a longer infrarenal abdominal aorta (152.0 vs. 130.0 mm, p < .001), longer AAA (126.2 vs. 93.0 mm), and greater linear distance from renal artery to aorto-iliac bifurcation (143.6 vs. 116.0 mm, p < .001). Caucasian patients had a larger inner common iliac artery diameter (right: 16.0 vs. 14.9 mm, p < .001, left: 16.0 vs. 15.2 mm, p < .001), larger inner exernal iliac artery diameter (right: 9.0 vs. 7.5 mm, p < .001 left: 9.0 vs. 7.7 mm, p < .001), and larger inner common femoral artery diameter (right: 10.0 vs. 5.9 mm, p < .001 left: 10.0 vs. 6.1 mm, p < .001). No difference was observed in AAA transverse diameter (62.0 vs. 63.1 mm, p = .492). CONCLUSION: The results showed that aorto-iliac anatomy in Caucasians differs significantly from Asians, particularly in the length of the common iliac arteries and infrarenal abdominal aorta, and in the transverse diameter of the common, external iliac, and common femoral arteries. Therefore, the exact criteria for stent graft design are dependent on the racial origin of the patient.

O blood group as an indicator for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: An aortic aneurysm is a general term for an enlargement (dilation) of the aorta to greater than 1.5 times normal size. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) primarily affects the population older than 50 years, with a prevalence of approximately 5%. There are a few theories about AAA etiology. Interest in the relationship between blood type and vascular disease has been established. The aim of our study is to evaluate distribution of blood-groups among the patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) as well as to identify any kind of relationship between blood type and AAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The design of our research is combination of retrospective and prospective case-control study in a sample of population of Montenegro. Statistical analysis was performed in SPPS v 20.0, using the chi-square test for independent samples, with the probability level at p < 0.05 as significant, and p < 0.01 as highly significant. RESULTS: O blood group was the most frequent among the examination group (53.11%), and A blood group was the most frequent among group without AAA (43.22%). Presence of AAA in individuals with O blood type was 1.46 higher than for the other blood types. CONCLUSIONS: This finding leads us to suspect that O blood type can be indicator for AAA.

The use of Endurant stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm: the story about extension of instruction for use with persistent good results of stent-graft latest generation.

The Endurant stent-graft (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) is a latest generation device for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. The idea behind designing such a graft came from the intention to broad the instruction for use (IFU) and to enable it to treat more challenging anatomy including the 10mm neck lengths, and more severe suprarenal and infrarenal angulations. Endurant stent-graft has active fixation through suprarenal stent with anchoring pins to provide migration resistance, optimized heights of stents and spacing between them for improved flexibility and conformability, low-profile delivery system with hydrophilic coating and controlled simple deployment mechanism. Short term results are excellent. Technical and clinical success is confirmed in Regulatory trials (EU and USA), as well as in ENGAGE and the Canadian registry. Many current publications record the use of Endurant stent-graft outside the Instruction for use. The results in a group of patients outside the instruction for use are comparable to those within instruction for use; with the exception of perioperative proximal endoleak type I. Mid-term results are consistent with short-term results. The long-term results are lacking.